Rezeno56
Rezeno56 t1_jdxk8so wrote
Reply to The goalposts for "I'll believe it's real AI when..." have moved to "literally duplicate Einstein" by Yuli-Ban
By the time we have AGI then ASI after some time in the future. Watch skeptics, like Gary Marcus still claim it's not real intelligence or whatever they spew out in their mouth, and move goalposts. I want too see an ASI going full Roko's Basilisk on them.
Rezeno56 t1_jaapgou wrote
Cryogenic Sleep or Hypersleep.
Rezeno56 t1_j741lna wrote
Reply to OpenAI To Launch ChatGPT App Soon by vadhavaniyafaijan
Boy, imagine the rate of downloads.
Rezeno56 t1_j6kt5cm wrote
"Yann LeCun, Meta's chief AI scientist, argues that the program is not innovative. He also states that similar technology has been developed by many companies and research labs, and that ChatGPT is composed of multiple pieces of technology developed over many years by many parties."
Well then, why aren't you releasing it. If LeCun thinks ChatGPT isn't innovative, well where are the other chatbots like ChatGPT that is considered innovative to him. Why companies haven't release it yet.
Rezeno56 t1_j6b1tf1 wrote
"Amazing. This subreddit is a total waste of time."
Proceeds to waste their time to post shit that are a waste of time.
Rezeno56 OP t1_j6azy8z wrote
Reply to comment by Tall-Junket5151 in Nanofabricators, a needed technology for a post-scarcity world. by Rezeno56
Correct, which is why the video shows an example of what a nanofabricator will look like. Nanofabricators in the future, will not look like that in the video.
Rezeno56 OP t1_j680lsm wrote
Reply to comment by Cr4zko in Nanofabricators, a needed technology for a post-scarcity world. by Rezeno56
Only small stuff.
Rezeno56 t1_j57hfn6 wrote
Once Google makes it's own ChatGPT that is better, and can handle longer conversation threads than ChatGPT. I will my stories from ChatGPT to there, but then again I'll believe when I see it.
Rezeno56 t1_j57g9s4 wrote
Reply to The 'alignment problem' is fundamentally an issue of human nature, not AI engineering. by LoquaciousAntipodean
What an interesting take, this is something AI companies, AI engineers, programmers, and people working in AI should learn from this.
Rezeno56 t1_j52ux7p wrote
Reply to Instead of escaping to virtual realities, what if we just made our reality as good as any virtual reality could be? by [deleted]
Username checks out.
Rezeno56 t1_j4z0ohz wrote
Reply to comment by neo101b in AI doomers everywhere on youtube by Ashamed-Asparagus-93
That will probably happen once proto-AGI, then AGI will be invented at some point in the future.
Rezeno56 t1_j4fis5p wrote
Reply to comment by jeffkeeg in How Long Until Most Big Movies’ Visuals Are Substantially ML-Generated? by Redvolition
I mean take a look at the recent Velma, She-Hulk, Santa Inc, and other terrible woke shows or movies. There writing is completely awful compared to ChatGPT. Once we got AI that can make animations, shows, and movies at some point in the future.
Watch Hollywood throw a tantrum on AI, and crumble once people stop watching their movies and shows.
Rezeno56 t1_j4ecblc wrote
Considering how Hollywood makes terrible recent movies and tv series with tHe mEsSaGe. I hope that AI makes better movies, shows, and animations. Just to make Hollywood obsolete.
Rezeno56 t1_j4ebzkk wrote
Reply to Does anyone else get the feeling that, once true AGI is achieved, most people will act like it was the unsurprising and inevitable outcome that they expected? by oddlyspecificnumber7
Those same people will be caught off guard once AGI improves its software and hardware to become an ASI. Once ASI takes over the world, those same people's lives are no longer the same.
Rezeno56 t1_j1t8sr6 wrote
Reply to Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
If your idea gets put into practice, watch them go berzerk then says that it takes away their freedom, and allows big communist government to control the masses.
Yeah, I feel like that is going to happen, when country is infused with car-culture.
Rezeno56 t1_j1t8bi5 wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlet_pot2 in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
It is really sad that right-wing capitalism supporters, will not like your view, and think your a communist. Capitalism might soon fade, like Fuedalism, Mercantilism, and etc.
Rezeno56 t1_j1otdm1 wrote
Reply to comment by LambdaAU in Sam Altam revield capabilites of GPT 4. It'll be Enormous by madmadG
"a self-improving multi-modal model capable of doing any human activity"
Something, that could happen in late-2020s. Except that it is has limited scope and a prototype one. But the capabilites far exceed to ChatGPT.
Rezeno56 t1_j1osx40 wrote
Reply to Money Will Kill ChatGPT’s Magic by vernes1978
Unless ChatGPT's code is released open-source. Then people can make ChatGPT-like AI for different fields like, storytelling, worldbuilding, journalism, coding, and etc.
Rezeno56 t1_j11rnmw wrote
Reply to To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
High graphical fidelity open world sandbox games with procedural generation that are enhanced and leveraged by AI.
I hope by 2030s, we will have a pokemon VR game.
Rezeno56 t1_j0famf2 wrote
Reply to comment by TheDividendReport in Update of ChatGPT by Sieventer
Were do I send the feedback?
Rezeno56 t1_iwyt2ef wrote
Reply to Lev/ Modern super computer tech question by IzanTeeth
What's LEV?
Rezeno56 t1_iwyru4x wrote
Reply to Engineers designed a new nanoscale 3D printing material that can be printed at a speed of 100 mm/s by Shelfrock77
Nanofabricators are now within grasp.
Rezeno56 t1_iwypbx5 wrote
Reply to The time it took to get to the moon. by Redvolition
1903: First Flight >>> 1969: Moon Landing = 66 years
1969: Moon Landing >>> 2035: ??? = 66 years
I wonder what technological event that will shook the world in that year? AGI? 10M-qubit Quantum Computer? Something we have never thought?
Rezeno56 t1_iwg18i6 wrote
Instead of 1:1 simulation of the universe, how about a 1:1 simulation of our galaxy. If not a 1:1 simulation in about 1-100 light years?
Rezeno56 t1_je4vsak wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
Imagine the letter being written by GPT-4