https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/722jfe/what_does_op_mean_in_reddit/dnfayjw/

https://www.howtogeek.com/698508/what-does-op-mean-online-and-how-do-you-use-it/

https://fossbytes.com/what-does-op-cake-day-mean-reddit/

etc.

>TurretLauncher[S]

> OP is probably referring to the two declared candidates in this race (neither of whom is named Wilkins).

Have you forgotten that you are on the TurretLauncher account right now, OP?

The Over the Hill Soccer League is great if you are over 30. Or 40. Or 48. Or 55. Or 62. Or 68.

Highly recommended.

https://www.othsl.org/cgi-bin/socman.pl

> Yes there is. Marijuana is federally prohibited and the form 4473 is a federal form. Per the ATFs package to FFLs Marijuana use of any kind makes you a prohibited person.

Absolutely correct.

You forgot to add that lying on 4473 is a felony, and that the feds love prosecuting anyone they catch doing that, so advising someone to omit their marijuana use when filling the 4473 is basically telling them to ask to be jailed.

They don't - they list at an asking price that got picked after a long discussion between them and their realtor, which accounts for what the timeline of the seller is, recent comparable sales, market trends, interest rate forecast, and a ton of other details which Zillow knows little about.

Zillow is fine for a quick ballpark number. Anything else, they are too much of a one size fits all answer to a very unique question - what is THIS house worth?

Totally understood... but again, Zillow can say anything they want.

Nobody should put much weight on a Zillow estimate.

Nobody can tell anyone what the future price of a house will be.

If they really could do that, they would make a huge fortune in real estate.

I would not pay much attention to Zillow - the only way to find out how much a house price should be is to put it on the market.

Anything else is an (more or less) educated guess.

>What would you say to the realtor who keeps saying price won't drop in price, but is now no longer in touch with you after they get your commission check.

Nothing, until you need to sell your house, and even then, you would only need to talk to them if you want to hire them for the job.

They earned that commission check when they closed the deal. No future obligations left.

My original statement:

>>driving an unregistered vehicle will get you in trouble once a police officer notices that, regardless of what state the plates are from.

Your "Quote":

> "Police will get you in trouble"

'Nuff said.

> Most likely explanation is some reddit employee who has never even seen a gun in real life got confused and in a panic pressed every button on their dashboard.

Rooting for a happy outcome in this case - let's hope Reddit realizes this was a mistake.

> I would still rather not play the game

How would housing work if you did not want to play the game?

To be fair, it is a very well written title - brief, factual, funny...

Much appreciated.

> Police cant ticket you for any plate or registration criteria outside of the state the vehicle is registered in.

I would suggest nobody takes this spectacularly incorrect opinion seriously.

There are not such loopholes in traffic laws - driving an unregistered vehicle will get you in trouble once a police officer notices that, regardless of what state the plates are from.

This is unfortunate, since the user had no way of knowing this was a violation, but it is highly unlikely that they will be able to contest that ban - as a private entity, Reddit can pretty much ban anyone and define the term "firearm" in ways that do not match the legal definition.

An unfortunate occurrence - thank you for sharing it so others are aware of Reddit's view on these matters.

> I agree, but dont see legalization happening anytime soon.

I hope you are wrong on that - lots of legislators are pushing hard to legalize cannabis.

>The state is probably more than satisified with current take from liquor stores and lottery.

I would disagree with that - the state is currently losing on a lot of tax revenue by not legalizing cannabis.

>Why make things more complicated?

I would argue that the cannabis ban makes things more complicated, and legalizing it would simplify everyone's life.

https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/billinfo.aspx?id=532&inflect=2

HB639 would tax cannabis sales at the Rooms and Meals tax rate - currently 8.5%.

Agreed - HB639 is allowing private stores to sell it, and it taxes it at the meals and rooms tax rate.

https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/billinfo.aspx?id=532&inflect=2

It is highly likely to pass the House this year (the sponsors are top leadership from both sides of the aisle).

As always, it's the Senate that is the stumbling block - I do not believe that Gov. Sununu would veto this legislation if it gets to their desk.

And if he vetoes it, I would love to see the outcome of the veto override voting.

HB639 is allowing private stores to sell it, and it taxes it at the meals and rooms tax rate.

https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/billinfo.aspx?id=532&inflect=2

It is highly likely to pass the House this year (the sponsors are top leadership from both sides of the aisle).

As always, it's the Senate that is the stumbling block - I do not believe that Gov. Sununu would veto this legislation if it gets to their desk.

And if he vetoes it, I would love to see the outcome of the veto override voting.

> but in most cases you could make reasonable assumptions about 2nd and 3rd choices, and try some simulations or something.

That is not what I was suggestion - those would be the assumptions that would lead to pure guesswork as results.

I was talking about monitoring the actual results from states or towns that are using the specific voting methods that are discussed.

> But until someone convinces me that these are extremely unlikely to happen IRL

That's hard to prove without real life examples.

At the end of the day, one can use the one voter in those examples to stand in for a group of people that decides to vote a certain way and the math will hold.

And it would be tough to predict future voter behavior without actual results from real elections - can only speculate so much before one's assumptions become unrealistic.

This kind of comment is why I love hanging around Reddit, despite its many frustrations.

That information is very much appreciated, kind stranger :)

> The reason is that they want to treat it like booze, only for sale in state liquor stores.

The measure most likely to pass the house this year would allow private stores and tax it at the meals and rooms tax rate, so we would be able to buy it for less than in the neighboring states.

Of course, the trick is in getting it by the Senate and Governor.

Why would vegans need to migrate?

Voting against this actually ensures that only the legislative body can propose constitutional amendments.

I am voting against it anyway because it's not needed, but I wanted to point out that your reason is inconsistent with your vote plans.

The constitutional convention vote is required to happen every ten years, and will likely fail, since it failed by a mile last time and I know of nobody that is campaigning for or against it.

Even if it passed, any proposed changes would have to be approved by 2 thirds more of the New Hampshire voters.

On the other constitutional question, the Register of Probate constitutional question eliminates an elected office that no longer has any duties or powers - all those duties have been transferred to different state agencies.

Answers like this one are why I keep coming back to reddit.

After you wade through all the lies and anger... there are still small gems comments this one that make it all worth it.