SoftwarePatient5050
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_jdq2rdq wrote
Reply to comment by christhomasburns in Police Captain Criminally Charged 1 Day after Retirement by JustZonesing
Bruh, are you under the impression that these are the only hand-written copies of these documents or something? You can't destroy a digital document by taking it.
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_jbtzgom wrote
Reply to Ancient dormant viruses found in permafrost, once revived, can infect amoeba. Findings hint at a much bigger problem—as the planet warms and the permafrost melts, there is a chance of viruses emerging that are capable of infecting humans by Wagamaga
It's also entirely possible that none of these viruses end up being capable of infecting humans.
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_jayuh4l wrote
The headline seems like bullshit. They mention a blacklist, but never explain what this "blacklist" is. They DO make reference to the Department of Commerce's "Entity List", but offer no explanation about what that means. From the Department of Commerce's website, it's not a "blacklist":
>The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) contain a list of names of certain foreign persons – including businesses, research institutions, government and private organizations, individuals, and other types of legal persons – that are subject to specific license requirements for the export, reexport and/or transfer (in-country) of specified items. These persons comprise the Entity List...On an individual basis, the persons on the Entity List are subject to licensing requirements and policies supplemental to those found elsewhere in the EAR.
The Department of Commerce had this to say in response to the claims from the House committee:
>"Every license reflected in this data -- which primarily involve exports of low-technology ...and other items that do not pose significant national security concerns ... was carefully reviewed," the agency said in a statement, explaining that the decisions are made by the Departments of Commerce, Defense, State, and Energy.
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j581tae wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Pierce County did an "whoopsie" by GunHead416
That does not appear to apply here:
>Binds only federal agencies and covers only records under the control of federal agencies (and, by contract, also applies to contractor personnel and systems used by a federal agency to maintain the records).
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j580j9v wrote
Reply to comment by rosesandpiglets in Pierce County did an "whoopsie" by GunHead416
Did you just find a random law to cite or something? What in the world do you think antitrust laws have to do with election information?
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j57fd2b wrote
Reply to comment by PNW_Explorer_16 in Pierce County did an "whoopsie" by GunHead416
What should come of this?
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j57epdh wrote
Reply to comment by rosesandpiglets in Pierce County did an "whoopsie" by GunHead416
Which federal law was broken?
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j21lf03 wrote
Reply to comment by Gekokapowco in Christmas brings new round of attacks on Northwest power grid by glitterkittyn
The sheriff's office is correct, actually. People assume that burglary means something was stolen, but that is not necessarily an element of burglary:
>Burglary, also called breaking and entering and sometimes housebreaking, is the act of entering a building or other areas without permission, with the intention of committing a criminal offence. Usually that offence is theft, robbery or murder, but most jurisdictions include others within the ambit of burglary.
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j16xgvr wrote
Cool, but also pretty dumb considering that they were the ones who made their hardware so damned difficult to work on to begin with.
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_izif226 wrote
A møøse once bit my sister...
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_izh4100 wrote
Reply to comment by SLCW718 in Pixel Fold renders arrive with detailed size and spec rumors for Google’s foldable phone, by SUPRVLLAN
I got one a couple of weeks ago. Figured I'd give it a try since we're up to the 4th generation now. I thought I'd hate the folding screen because of the crease, but I really don't notice it.
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_iu5zdpz wrote
Reply to Cape Flattery, absolutely gorgeous. by darkduchess56
*hits save button*
SoftwarePatient5050 t1_jdq2xs6 wrote
Reply to comment by MakionGarvinus in Police Captain Criminally Charged 1 Day after Retirement by JustZonesing
That's not how pensions work. You don't lose it if you get fired. You're legally entitled to whatever you had vested in the system at the point you leave your employer. So whether he retired or was fired, he'd still get his pension.