TinyBurbz

TinyBurbz t1_iz3o2dt wrote

Reply to comment by No-Satisfaction3455 in The first complete picture of the Arctic sea ice freeze-thaw cycle reveals that total ice growth still cannot offset sea ice loss in summer by marketrent

>According to some of Bruce's friends and neighbors, he often had
difficulty making decisions as a result of his traumatic brain injury;
two described him to The Independent as "suggestible"

Bruce was not a climate scientist.

4

TinyBurbz OP t1_iyxxvqm wrote

Reply to comment by FilthyCommieAccount in this sub by TinyBurbz

>Ten years from now though I think there's a case to be made that the market for digital visual artists is going to look a lot like the market for work horses

So human made art will be an expensive highly valuable luxury item? Sounds like aspiring creatives can get very far.

1

TinyBurbz OP t1_iyxaq14 wrote

Reply to comment by FilthyCommieAccount in this sub by TinyBurbz

I actually use AI for texture work myself. This tech is definitely going to displace a lot of labor.... but I have low expectations for productions who use AI for everything.

1

TinyBurbz OP t1_iywkju4 wrote

Reply to comment by FilthyCommieAccount in this sub by TinyBurbz

>Yeah that's ridiculous AI art is not better than humans right now but I would be careful with the argument it can't get better than us because it was trained on human data argument. We have models that perform at superhuman levels that were trained on nothing but human data.

In what regard? What do you mean by 'better'

1

TinyBurbz OP t1_iysw2eq wrote

Reply to comment by TheDividendReport in this sub by TinyBurbz

>misses the real headline: AI is going to displace more people, faster, and we all should be beneficiaries of a technology that wouldn’t be possible without our data

AI is coming for Ad generation first; something folks need to understand.

1

TinyBurbz OP t1_iysjxm0 wrote

Reply to comment by TheDividendReport in this sub by TinyBurbz

>you are also more than free to see some cool things and maybe even use it as your own inspiration.

I dont hate AI art. I hate prompters that act like that generated images are "better than what humans can create" which is absolutely delusional because it was trained on art by humans. Not only that, but a majority of the time the images generated look like shit to someone with even slightly critical eyes.

Let's not even start on the fact that people who produce art don't want to use AI most of the time, because the production of the art is the fulfilling part. Which brings us back to the OP

−1

TinyBurbz OP t1_iysj442 wrote

Reply to comment by SgathTriallair in this sub by TinyBurbz

>This is giving the tools of art to the masses

Stopped reading here. Literally everyone has the "tools of art" stop trying to gaslight people.

−2