The cinobites are my favorite item at cinobun though.

More supply causes price decreases. Why has no one ever thought of this before?

No, I said nothing even close to your delusional rant.

There actually are quite a few. A huge amount of vegan food is highly processed trash, and things like onion rings are vegan.

The scrawny grey vegan comes from the fact that if you do eat mostly plants and don't pile on things like oils it's very difficult to get both high protein and balanced nutrition while also getting a good amount of calories, so they end up looking malnourished. This could mostly be corrected with some resistance training and a daily vegan blend protein powder with some oils in the foods though.

If by swole you mean gargantuanly fat, then sure.

Not by weight, by calorie. Plus I'm not sure that's true. It doesn't have nearly any carbs and will usually have near even grams of fat to protein, like 5g of fat and 6g of protein. Since there are 9 calories per gram of fat and 4 calories per gram of protein that means of the about 70 calories 35% of them are protein.

But yes, an egg will have 6-8g of protein so to get 100g you'd need to eat over a dozen.

Armed with this data you can put vital wheat gluten in AP flour and make some great hamburgers that are 33% TVP and you have yourself a decently protein heavy delicious burger that are very cheap and not as terrible for you.

This would be amazing if you could make it interactive with your own dietary constraints to sort the foods.

For instance, I'd like to get 125g of protein per day in a 2000 calorie diet, what foods fall in to that ratio and worth them by price.

Where were products like protein powders on the list?

Peanut butter is a fat source, not a protein source. The calories from protein are like 12-15% but it's 70-ish percent fat.

Too much isn't bad until you get to about 100 times what it is now. If too little is bad and too much is bad, what is the ideal amount? I'd argue it's somewhere in the 1000-2000ppm level for ideal plant growth and largest land areas being the most productive. Why is it never studied that way, do you think?

CO2 stops the earth being a frozen wasteland. If you think removing it is positive you just have a hatred of humanity and life itself.

Pretty soon it will be at great levels to support even greater crop yields and we will be living in a time of abundance. That is unless these anti-human nutters mess everything up.