Way2L8AND1

Way2L8AND1 t1_j31o8pw wrote

Ok so now you have completely changed the math equation, and still make no good point.

So... You are saying... Based on this math, That someone making $100,000 a year DOES in fact need $450 in government assistance ? Agreed to disagree. The cap is too high and wasted money. And someone that makes $100,000 and paid in $7000 (your math) does not need a kickback.

−9

Way2L8AND1 t1_j31kmlk wrote

5% of $100,000 is $5,000... 20% of $30,000 is $6,000. What on earth is your weird math equation for again ? So you are saying because someone with $100,000 got back $1000 less than someone with $30000 that means they are equally in need ?
This may be the worst point I've ever heard. Throwing money at inflation does NOT help inflation.

−7