beatthestupidout

beatthestupidout t1_is4v1i0 wrote

It is, but it requires pumps, heavier engines, etc. to run, and only convert their energy into motive power with around a 30% efficiency compared to the >90% of an electric motor. The batteries are catching up in real terms faster than a simple comparison of densities would suggest.

1

beatthestupidout t1_irzx9y1 wrote

Not no byproducts, but significantly reduced. You can't control side reactions, however unlikely they are. B11 + He4 (the expected byproduct of p + B11) = N14 + n. There's also a rare p + B11 = C11 + n to watch out for as well.

It's a massive improvement on every reaction shitting out neutrons though, and because the main byproduct is a charged particle you can use direct energy conversion instead of going via steam which means the energy output threshold for viability is around 60% of what it would be otherwise.

*C11, not C12 sorry. That then decays with a half life of 20 minutes back into boron-11.

4

beatthestupidout t1_iqzrkze wrote

Iceland is very similar, though getting better with reforestation efforts. The problem that far North is the trees grow incredibly slowly, and when they're small (which they are for longer), they're vulnerable. That's the real benefit of this machine, you skip the bit where the deer eat all your saplings and you're back to square one.

3