cah11
cah11 t1_jeau6fg wrote
Reply to comment by IwishIcouldBeWitty in Four bankers who helped Putin’s friend set up Swiss bank account convicted by BezugssystemCH1903
I understood your point quite well, the problem is your solution won't work at any kind of national or worldwide scale. Having an arbitrarily valued currency is the inevitable end state of any kind of economy spanning more than a couple thousand people clustered in the same place geographically.
Using your example of someone having survival knowledge versus practically useless pieces of paper only matters under the assumptions that:
-
There is no viable method of fast, mass transit.
-
There is no viable method of (near enough) instantaneous communication.
-
There is no longer a functional, centralized federal government.
I find your insinuation that anyone (myself included) who doesn't agree with you on this point is a:
>genetically modified sheep like you are so domesticated it's not even funny
To be quite insulting, so this is the last time I will respond to you.
Have a good rest of your life!
cah11 t1_jeaob03 wrote
Reply to comment by IwishIcouldBeWitty in Four bankers who helped Putin’s friend set up Swiss bank account convicted by BezugssystemCH1903
I mean, part of the problem of a bartering system is that different things are valued differently by different people. If you tried to run a whole national, nevermind worldwide, economy through bartering it would fall apart almost immediately because no one would be able to agree what was worth what to everyone else.
That's why the concept of a reserve currency exists. A denomination of bank notes where everyone agrees that $1 is $1, and then you base everyone else's currency more or less around that. Saying the use of currency is the root problem with all the world's wealth disparity problems isn't even close to the mark.
cah11 t1_jecftau wrote
Reply to comment by notrevealingrealname in Four bankers who helped Putin’s friend set up Swiss bank account convicted by BezugssystemCH1903
Don't bother engaging, my read on them is they aren't interested in a good faith discussion, they're here to collect upvotes while arguing:
> I don't know why you think I'm trying to come up with a solution. I'm not trying to solve any problem or even insinuate that I'm solving a problem.
in response to me saying the below quote from their original comment won't work:
> If we can learn to work together on a bartering system again, the whole idea of money would go away and these people would have zero power. We give them the power. Why we do that? I do not know because we are dumb.
They're trying to pretend they're just offering observations after literally saying bartering is the solution to wealth inequality. I'm assuming they're some unhinged /r/iamverysmart teenager who has fully bought into the idea of anarcho-libertarianism as a realistic and legitimate political position held back by the brainwashed masses too stupid to realize they're being lead on by the evil capitalists.