dny6
dny6 t1_j1nbq7i wrote
Reply to Any tasting menus or other recommended restaurant experiences you’d recommend for a date? by ljohnson33
Pammys, oleana
dny6 t1_j1iravv wrote
Reply to BEWARE! Alewife Brook flooded yesterday, making the Greenway path impassible. Actually, we stopped one jogger from running into that contaminated water. He was determined not to continue. But there are PCBs, PAHs, and heavy metals in the brook sediment. by SaveTheAlewifeBrook
This whole area is predicted to be a massive flood zone in the not so distant future
dny6 t1_j1iqaur wrote
In addition to insulation, Look into an acoustic underlayment that goes under your floors.
dny6 t1_j0z6xhw wrote
I mean, the suburbs are full of people who hate taxes and don't want to live in a city but paradoxically want city services. There is never enough revenue to pay for all the upkeep.
dny6 t1_izo9gnr wrote
The city is full of shit saying the water isn’t that hard. Lol.
We are looking to get a water softener and filter
dny6 t1_izo94y7 wrote
Reply to Why are some more obscure car brands (e.g. Volvo, Saab) so popular in Cambridge MA? by MussleGeeYem
No mention of the omnipresent mini cooper? I would say mini and Subaru are the two most over represented brands in Cambridge relative to the rest of the US
dny6 t1_ixvz6s0 wrote
Reply to comment by pillbinge in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
If you have any interest in looking in to the history of housing zoning laws, you will find that they have nothing to do with legitimate democracy.
I have no idea what this has to do with state control of anything. Housing zoning laws have barely been around longer than most of us, “coincidentally” popping up all over the country following the civil rights movement of the 60s. They are new and failed policy with a horrible history.
Just build housing. It isn’t complicated.
By and large, you are mostly right though — in that the problem will be solved democratically. People need homes. Nimbys can live in denial about that all they want, but young people are clearly getting fed up
dny6 t1_ixuhsps wrote
Reply to comment by -Im-A-Little-Teapot_ in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
It’s a city dude. The whole thing with cities is that they change.
dny6 t1_ixufzb3 wrote
Reply to comment by pillbinge in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Except we’re not talking about their land. We’re talking about other peoples land that they think they can control.
But yes, you’re right
dny6 t1_ixs3s4l wrote
Reply to What Planting Trees In the Street Could Look Like in Boston: Learning From Other Cities – StreetsblogMASS by me5vvKOa84_bDkYuV2E1
That would be nice. But it will probably require a 20 year environmental review and 30 resident meetings and the sacrifice of a virgin first born.
dny6 t1_ixr55cy wrote
Reply to comment by bryanhealey in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Personally I would prefer working in Kendall with or without transit. Networking in the beating heart of an industry is a very real thing.
But yes you are right
dny6 t1_ixmu391 wrote
Reply to comment by missitnoonan78 in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Well they clearly care about something in Cambridge, these companies don’t pay multi million dollar rents for the fun of it.
Part of the solution to the problem you describe is upzoning the suburbs to provide enough density for subway expansion to make sense.
The state has already started this by mandating upzoning near train stations.
I would fully expect in the next ten to fifteen years for SFH only zoning to be non existent inside 128
dny6 t1_ixmsk6e wrote
Reply to comment by some1saveusnow in Was making Sherman st a one way seriously necessary? by Sassysoap42
Attitudes like that are how we ended up being unable to build any infrastructure anywhere. Cities are almost by definition dynamic places.
While I can understand the neighbors frustration, that doesn’t mean that it is just to stop public works projects because some people don’t like change
dny6 t1_ixmc1ad wrote
Reply to The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
These companies pretty much pay for everything nice we have, and are the reason our property taxes can be so low. I don’t think many people think the whole economy should be biotech, but to chase them away by refusing to build housing is just pathetic
dny6 t1_ixmbj6w wrote
Reply to comment by CorbuGlasses in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
These boards shouldn’t even exist. They’re filled with people with no professional qualifications other than being old and wealthy
dny6 t1_ixmbf00 wrote
Reply to comment by pillbinge in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
You act as if you have a god given right to your suburban life style even as the region chokes
dny6 t1_ixmb4yz wrote
Reply to The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
It’s a big problem. Cambridge can do a lot by allowing 5-6 stories by right anywhere in the city. Brattle represents a huge chunk of the city that is not only SFH only but also 6,000 sqft minimum.
Large chunks of the city are 2-3 only which is absurd.
Cambridge does not have to become Manhattan in order to meet housing needs.
Same goes for all the suburbs inside 128.
dny6 t1_ixmaib0 wrote
Reply to comment by missitnoonan78 in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Harsh reality that these companies don’t care if Susan from HR wants to live in Wellesley and hates her commute. Those urban Junior scientists are the life blood of these companies, and they in aggregate do not want to live in the suburbs or commute there.
But you are 100% right that the suburb commute needs to be fixed, via trains and subways
dny6 t1_ixma3sr wrote
Reply to comment by CoolKid2326 in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Go to your city council and demand the build housing
dny6 t1_ixma0bm wrote
Reply to comment by joebos617 in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Cambridge removed all parking minimums very recently
dny6 t1_ixm9x1d wrote
Reply to comment by gregzhoba in The lack of homes could strangle our life sciences industry: Why the concentration of biopharma in Cambridge and Boston would ratchet up costs, exacerbate the housing crisis, and pitch the region from its throne. by writethefuture3
Yea, not really, and these companies have a lot of difficulty hiring good talent. Astrazeneca built a sprawling headquarters in Waltham and then abandoned it only a few years later for Cambridge because they couldn’t compete
dny6 t1_ixdb0m0 wrote
Reply to comment by pattyorland in Was making Sherman st a one way seriously necessary? by Sassysoap42
Well, first — there are people who live there who do enjoy the change. There are also people who hate any change but will possibly change their minds as they get used to it.
Second — these streets belong to the city and are funded and used by all residents of the city. I’m not sure why people live in the city if they can’t accept that.
dny6 t1_ixd2f9d wrote
Reply to comment by noob_tube03 in City Council Proposing Affordable Housing Upzoning by blackdynomitesnewbag
It’s dreary because they are all office buildings. These are residential towers
dny6 t1_ixcldd9 wrote
The city could probably get much more housing by allowing 4-6 family development by right instead of allowing the rich of Brattle to cut off their neighborhood with exclusionary zoning. North Cam is almost exclusively zoned for only 2 family despite being right next to alewife and Davis and porter
In general I support any free market solution to housing, but sky scraper housing adds a lot of people without many businesses
dny6 t1_j20bnma wrote
Reply to Tea-ware in or around Boston? by itsokjanet
Mem tea in Davis