enkae7317
enkae7317 t1_j9525dq wrote
Reply to comment by Return72 in Microsoft has shown off an internal demo that gives users the ability to control Minecraft by telling the game what to do, and lets players create Minecraft worlds by AI language model by Schneller-als-Licht
I think end goal here is to generate full games by AI (hopefully by 2030). Imagine creating a game just by prompts and then fine tuning. I'm sure it'll still take teams and many man hours, though.
enkae7317 t1_j7opwl8 wrote
Reply to AI Progress of February Week 1 (1-7 Feb) by Pro_RazE
Great list but curious if you have either the article link or some sort of sources for all of these.
enkae7317 t1_j7f8v0c wrote
Reply to comment by imlaggingsobad in What is the price point you would be OK with buying a humanoid robot for personal use? by crua9
I'd imagine the robot would start off empty slate. Like bare basic skills. Then you "purchase" the software for it to do other shit. IE) 25k for the starting base.
Want it to cook for you? Buy the Cook Apprentice Upgrade on the eShop for 10k. Simple software upgrade once you purchase the plan and BAM. It now knows to cook basic dishes. Advanced dishes (like chef-level skills) pay an additional 10k dollars.
Want it to know how to mow the lawn? That'll be 5k dollars. Take out the trash? 2k dollars. Do laundry? 2k dollars. You get the point.
Kind of like what Tesla is doing RIGHT NOW with full self drive tech where it's locked behind a paywall for X amt of dollars and you can always subscribe to upgrade the car.
enkae7317 t1_j6m8d5i wrote
Reply to comment by REOreddit in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
I agree and I think this is the reason WHY they're not releasing their product yet. They remember Tay getting racist and xenophobic and all sorts of crazy within a day or two of being released to the public. They saw that and were like "nope", we aint gettin that bad press.
So they spend years and years moderating their internal chatbot and being too scared to release it publicly, because they know it'll go racist or whatever. They will take years upon years to build failsafe after failsafe and before they know it--a competitor (ChatGPT) released theirs first and now they're scrounging up, picking up scraps to try and get SOME footing in the door before getting forgotten in the annals of history.
enkae7317 t1_j6m7dnj wrote
Isn't Replika basically a crappier offshoot of GPT2 or something like that? Like they're years behind in the LLM sense.
enkae7317 t1_j60038m wrote
Reply to comment by Martholomeow in it seems like the tipping point is coming soon... by captain_gumpy
You mean half the searches are essentially just ads that are highly prevalent by SEO. I agree the search engine is broken.
The other day I was looking up how to do some power query stuff on excel. What I would normally do is go to google search and type it in and then wade through links of bullshit/ads for about 10 minutes before I finally MAYBE find somebody else that has had the same problem in the past. Then if I'm lucky--it'll have somebody that responded with the right answer.
Instead, I went to ChatGPT and simply typed in my issue and ChatGPT was able to, not one, but give me THREE solutions to my problem. Within seconds.
enkae7317 t1_j3pv2yh wrote
Reply to comment by CyberAchilles in "Community" Prediction for General A.I continues to drop. by 420BigDawg_
Just trust me, bro.
enkae7317 t1_j3puzqq wrote
Reply to Do you think in the 2030s it will be common for most households to have a 3D printer? by BeginningInfluence55
In today's world, 3d printers are extremely gimmicky and most people that use them are only hobbyists and tech enthusiasts. In 10 years I can see it becoming better as technology progresses but still gimmicky (for the modern layperson).
However, I can see it having great industrial uses and I think that'll be where it shines the most.
enkae7317 t1_iy2yirw wrote
Reply to Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Because VR/AR is one big sham. We are going to eventually skip it all together and go straight to BMI.
enkae7317 t1_ivyyf8d wrote
!RemindMe 5 years
enkae7317 t1_itnrpt2 wrote
We can do it now, albeit very poorly. I'd imagine in 5 years we will have close to perfect mimicry of anybody's voice given enough sampling.
enkae7317 t1_itidjit wrote
Today's voice assistants are just gimicky devices that provide no real value. It is basically you typing shit into google but without the typing. They just read top results from google essentially.
​
When voice assistants first released it was very cool and unique for all of about 5 minutes and then almost a decade later, there is barely any progression in that field.
enkae7317 t1_is4kd0v wrote
We going full circle boys!
enkae7317 t1_j9eenzy wrote
Reply to comment by quitepossiblesure in Would you play a videogame with AI advanced enough that the NPCs truly felt fear and pain when shot at? Why or why not? by MultiverseOfSanity
You play a game and the random npc you just killed has an entire history generated by AI. It has his birth day, his passions, fears, life accomplishments, what he did in his life to lead up to that very moment he got killed by the PC. A full glossary of his life can be accessed.
That'll be game changing.