hachijuhachi
hachijuhachi t1_j6j0bmn wrote
I remember a room key like that at one of the Disney world hotels. This woulda been in the late 90s or early 00s. Can’t remember which trip exactly.
hachijuhachi t1_iuml8xu wrote
Reply to comment by freedoomed in Keystone Collections says I owe an absurd amount of interest and penalty's by Superteetee
IDK - I've had good luck. Any time I've contacted BBB, I got a pretty rapid response from the business I was complaining about asking what they could do to remedy the situation. Granted, this most recently happened in probably like 2016, but seems like, for some companies, the BBB complain still carries a little weight.
hachijuhachi t1_itchw95 wrote
Reply to comment by pocketbookashtray in U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case by MandoFett123456
That’s all you got? Here I was hoping I was up against someone with some real evidence, something beyond a baseless claim. But then you switched gears to “you’re dumb” and now I’m honestly a little disappointed.
What I haven’t seen is any voter fraud with my own two eyes. So I gotta depend on reports of others. And see, the only others who claim that there is “rampant” voter fraud, even voter fraud that amounts to anything more than a handful of republicans who tried voting multiple times (shame they didn’t realize this really isn’t an effective way to impact the outcome of an election). Those who do claim that there was voter fraud have been the last president, who lost the election and has a reputation that, let’s just say, calls his credibility into some question, and those who support him.
Wouldn’t it be better for you guys to say “ok. You know what? We lost that one. It sucks. But let’s find someone else who can continue the things we liked about the last president (who lost) and leave some of the things we didn’t like behind?” Find a new standard bearer that more people will take seriously. All these voter fraud claims make the claimants look like sore losers.
Can’t you find me one reputable, unbiased report of rampant voter fraud? One?
hachijuhachi t1_it9gcg9 wrote
Reply to comment by pocketbookashtray in U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case by MandoFett123456
Nope. Your analogy only works if drunk driving literally didn’t have a meaningful outcome. You’re comparing drunk driving - something that injures and kills innocent people (10,000 deaths/year per NHTSA). Voter fraud has never been shown to impact the outcome of any recent U.S. election. It used to be rampant. It’s just not anymore. Technology and practices have improved to remedy what was once a real problem. It’s a poor analogy. One is a real problem. The other is a windmill that quixotic republicans are trying to convince us all is a giant.
hachijuhachi t1_isvy7ro wrote
Reply to comment by introspeck in U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case by MandoFett123456
Specifically, what laws were ignored?
hachijuhachi t1_isv45z7 wrote
Reply to comment by pocketbookashtray in U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case by MandoFett123456
Audits that were funded by the losing candidate concluded there was not fraud to a degree that would have had any effect on the outcome. Find a new line or find a new person to try it on.
hachijuhachi t1_isu84ge wrote
Reply to comment by No-Professional-1884 in U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case by MandoFett123456
Helo me understand the difference between what I'm saying and what you're saying.
hachijuhachi t1_istub3i wrote
Reply to comment by thenewtbaron in U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case by MandoFett123456
Thank you. Details are important. Especially when they're ridiculous.
hachijuhachi t1_istmwyn wrote
Voting is a constitutional right and now we're playing games with people ballots because they weren't dated? Any reasonable person could tell you this is nothing more than disenfranchisement.
hachijuhachi t1_iseu4k7 wrote
Reply to comment by Breadisraw in Coudersport, Pennsylvania Town square when I visited a few years ag by JohnWarosa69420
I grew up in the area too and I think you’re right. The sign in front of the church says “hollow” and there’s some kind of movie set lighting on the brick building in the back.
hachijuhachi t1_jeh4wdm wrote
Reply to New state bill would require carbon monoxide detectors in daycare by Sandstorm400
This is a great example of why the free market can’t be trusted with a lot of things. Without regulation, this is a corner that would continue to be cut.