monsieurxander

monsieurxander t1_je1u6x6 wrote

It's not the creatives' fault. To this day Disney actively suppresses queer content that writers want to include.

>We at Pixar have personally witnessed beautiful stories, full of diverse characters, come back from Disney corporate reviews shaved down to crumbs of what they once were. Nearly every moment of overtly gay affection is cut at Disney’s behest, regardless of when there is protest from both the creative teams and executive leadership at Pixar.

7

monsieurxander t1_j9z9pz5 wrote

It's not a real quote. Someone misquoted them as they were live-tweeting an event, and publications ran with it. When the audio turned up with what they actually said, those publications didn't rush to correct themselves. What they actually said:

>“With the fantasy genre on television, tonally it’s very easy [go too] campy. Every scene, you change these two lines and it’s Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” Weiss jokes. “Also, in terms of fantasy exposition, with proper nouns, it’s almost like a game of Jenga, where you’re trying to plow as many of them as possible without the whole thing falling over. In the first pilot, we had one too many and the whole thing fell over. Going forward, we tried to keep that stuff to a minimum, because we didn’t just want to appeal to a fantasy fanbase. We wanted them to love it, and we wanted our parents to love it, and people who play professional football to love it. We wanted to reach a wider audience, and to do that keeping the tone [under control] was very important.”

14

monsieurxander t1_j2b96d7 wrote

I think it's more likely that it was written by one team, and then rewritten by the other.

WGA rules state that if the final draft keeps more than 33% of the original, the original writer (or writing team) gets a teleplay credit.

If it's less than that, and it kept a "basic narrative, idea, theme or outline," they get a story credit.

6