orzechod

orzechod t1_j2bx2pe wrote

I thought this rule changed recently too but I can't find any info online applying specifically to Worcester. I just tear off and throw out any greasy bits and recycle the clean bits.

but, in general: when in doubt, throw it out. if the recycling stream is too contaminated then it gets burned or dumped into a landfill instead of properly recycled.

14

orzechod t1_iwlrs0f wrote

I'd be interested in seeing a comparison between Worcester and surrounding towns which lists miles of public road, snow-removal budget, and citizen satisfaction. my gut says things are worse here because the ratio of plowed miles to available dollars is higher, but that's just a guess.

3

orzechod t1_iuhpcnj wrote

on the one hand, you could pay like $50 a year (or $0, if you are exempt) and get free money from the state in order to improve parks and make housing more affordable. on the other hand, you could discuss your $4/mo surcharge using catchphrases like "a tax on a tax" as if that's not how all taxes everywhere already work. good arguments on both sides if you ask me!

2

orzechod t1_isyg8mm wrote

then there's no direct financial impact to you, though I'm guessing your landlord will try to use this to justify yet another rent increase. (don't fall for it; the owner of a triple-decker worth $700K will only see their tax bill go up by something like $147 per year)

the benefits would be: nicer outdoor spaces, better historical preservation efforts, and more affordable housing. it's not a general slush fund; the money can only be spent on certain types of things. and as another reply to my comment mentioned, Worcester residents are already putting money into this fund (via surcharges on real-estate transactions) but never taking any money out of it (since we haven't signed on as a CPA community).

I'm voting yes on Q5. it'll cost me an extra $53 next year. I'll gladly pay $53 for better parks and more accessible housing.

17

orzechod t1_isy850y wrote

take the assessed value of your house, subtract $100K from it, and calculate what the property tax would be on that reduced value. pay 1.5% of that number into a special state fund, from which Worcester can withdraw as much as its residents pay in and use it to improve parks, recreational spaces, and affordable housing.

33