preppytarg

preppytarg t1_jdzxfcz wrote

Season 1 was shot during the height of Covid restrictions. That, plus budgetary issues, I think led them to doing a LOST trick where they just focused on the principal cast, and occasionally had background extras moping around.

I remember there were scenes where it was supposed to be the entire group, and you only saw principals with no background actors at all. That was definitely a Covid thing.

5

preppytarg t1_jc7vwfd wrote

Daisy Jones & The Six

ETA: I picked up the book 2 weeks ago after watching the first 3 episodes. I finished it last night. TBH I don't know if the book was all that great. It's good beach read I guess. I'm more in love with show.

2

preppytarg t1_j7pay0b wrote

>The game took place in 2013 then it jumps 20 years in the future.

The game was released in 2013, yeah? There's nothing special about that year otherwise. So the outbreak started in present day, and the main story takes place in an alternate future.

With the show, they decided to set the main story in an alternate present. So they just subtracted 20 years from 2023.

Had they set the outbreak in 2023, then it might invite unintended logic questions related to the world's prior pandemic experience (Covid). Best to avoid of all of that and do the opposite of what the game did.

2

preppytarg t1_j1m1tzl wrote

Those shows didn't popularize director rotation. It's how TV has been made for decades.

>I'm genuinely surprised that there isn't more dysfunction and disconnect in the quality and cinematography

A director stepping in is expected to stick to the formula, the look and feel of the show that's already been established. That's why a TV director traditionally has less creative authority.

3