Do you think they all make it that long in the wild?

Nature isn’t this magical place where all the animals frolic happily through green fields and die of old age.

So what’s your solution? Given that beef is one of Brazil’s biggest exports and the money that is generated by this production and exportation improves the lives of countless Brazilian people. Should they simply suffer and die in poverty? Morality is simple when you don’t have to actually suffer the consequences firsthand. When you can simply sit on your high horse and say “meat bad” when you drive to your local market and enjoy the privilege of being able to purchase any number of globally sourced out of season fruits and vegetables with no thought to the suffering involved in their production.

Less pain than if it was being eaten alive by a pack of wolves. Nature is a harsh mistress and nobody makes it out of here alive.

And yet you seem wholly unable to actually rebut the argument.

You do know they are burning the Amazon to create arable farmland to feed their families right?

How about the fact that significantly more arable farmland will be required if we want everyone to make the “morally correct” choice to switch to a plant based diet than if we continue using animals as a food source.

In your opinion

There will always be suffering. Raising animals for meat, milk and cheese doesn’t automatically equate to animal suffering or cruelty. Just as farming and plant based diets are not inherently ethical. There is a great deal of human and animal suffering and cruelty inherent in the labor required for large scale food production and distribution. Your privileged esthetic choice to eat plants is not in any way morally superior to the alternative, despite your assertion to the contrary.

If there’s human and animal suffering in vegetable farming it makes your argument that eating vegetables is morally superior appear pretty superficial, if not completely detached from the reality of food production.

Yes, because there’s no human or animal suffering associated with commercial vegetable farming.

They certainly aren’t as delicious as goats but if it helps you to feel morally superior then I’m glad you enjoy it.

They are also delicious and nutritious.

The question itself is an implication. You were implying that because he had her number, she must have given it to him and therefore wanted him to contact her. The naïveté is a nice touch though.

Tell me you send unsolicited dick pics without saying “I send unsolicited dick pics”.

Tell me you send unsolicited dick pics without saying “I send unsolicited dick pics”.

I think monopoly needs an update with civil unrest and chopi boyz.

some exclusions may apply