stefantalpalaru

stefantalpalaru t1_j6mxoqm wrote

> we stopped doing that "you're responsible for your ancestors crimes" thing after the middle ages

Is that why you keep defending those crimes and rewriting history to unburden your guilty conscience?

−2

stefantalpalaru t1_j6mjksi wrote

> Saying the Belgian government was complicit because they gave him a loan is just idiotic.

Read again what you wrote. Then read it again, and again, and again, until you see all that blood on your hands.

−12

stefantalpalaru t1_j6mcmub wrote

Belgians like to pretend it was all the king's fault, because he acted on his own. That is far from the truth.


"King Leopold’s Bonds and the Odious Debts Mystery" (2020):

«Eventually, and in violation of an earlier pledge that the colony would not be a drain on Belgium’s finances, the King sought a loan from Belgium itself. That loan was made—interest free, in the amount of 25 million francs—in return for his agreement to give the Congo to Belgium in his will.»

«Moreover, Leopold agreed that “at the end of ten years, either the loan would be repaid, or the Free State would be handed over to Belgium.” The colony, in other words, was security for the loan.»

«Leopold therefore had to sell, but the terms of the deal were, from a modern perspective, generous. Belgium not only took over his debt obligations, but also committed to pay for many of his ongoing pet construction projects in Belgium (palaces, gardens and more), and pledged a 50 million franc payment to Leopold “as a mark of gratitude for his great sacrifices made for the Congo.” As Hochschild notes, “[s]ome of the debt the outmaneuvered Belgian government assumed [and then put on the Congolese] was in effect to itself—the nearly 32 million francs worth of loans Leopold had never paid back.”»

«Stengers concludes that “King Leopold extracted money from the Congo, but used it almost exclusively to enrich the [Belgian] national heritage by acquisitions of property, by monumental constructions, and by works of urbanization. His obsession was not with his own fortune but with the embellishment of his country.”»

20