Your sister did not overreact. You F’ed up.

Da.

Welcome comrade. Putin will be pleased.

Russian is a race? You’re hilarious.

Nobody complains in Moscow because they don’t want to end up accidentally falling out of a window.

Tail trying to wag the dog.

You are an alcoholic. Please get help, for your kid's sake.

DarK is my favorite show of the last few years.

Is there no respite from these incels? Good grief give it a rest.

The article supposes that right to repair will cause consumers to keep their phones on average for an additional year. Is there any research to support that aspect of this? It sounds like that could be an outcome of this, but I'd rather see something backing it up. Phone are often upgraded to get the latest thing, not because they stopped working, so to get to an average across all phone users of an additional year, you've actually got to be convincing a significant segment of the population to keep their phones for quite a bit longer. But I am very much willing to read any data/research on this.

Im sort of back and forth in my head about if doing this via a state law will be effective or not or if it would need federal backing to be successful. Would it have the eventual effect of something like the California emissions standards (tho that seems to have taken decades to get it finally uniformly accepted 1970-2022) or will they just sell lesser, right-to-repair versions of their phones to the relatively small subset of NY users who wouldn't just drive to NJ and buy the better one?

“Y’all know this is a whiffleball right?” has got me crying. Thanks ! Hahahaha

Aren't these all basically measuring the same problem? Also this would only apply to people who drive for delivery, not the army of bike delivery folk.

Congestion level
Number of traffic jams
Traffic jam length
Hours lost during congestion
Driving speeds

I mean you aren't really offering any "advice" until you know what really caused the problem. Once you know the specific problem, you might offer advice that people can actually use. Right now its just adding uncertainty.

Probably better to wait until the resolution with a clearer explanation of what happened before dropping FUD bombs for clicks.

I think there is an issue with language here (what is a scooter vs moped). But regardless, anything bigger than a basic e-bike (a bike frame with a small motor and those long thin rectangular batteries) is no longer a bike and legally restricted from using the lane.

Was about to say I think maybe there's a language issue here.

>bike only elitism

No. Scooters are MUCH HEAVIER than bikes. SO even if they are going the same speed as bikes they are DEADLY to cyclists. It has NOTHING to do with elitism and EVERYTHING to do with the law (and the laws of physics).

VTL 102-a – Definition of Bicycle Lane – A portion of the roadway which has been designated by striping, signing and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicycles.

No.

Right on.

Oh sorry maybe I misread it ...

>Just positing on Reddit does nothing

Everybody vote!!!

So how exactly is giving people info on how to vote a bad idea?

1. It's a reminder to vote.
2. It's full of any info they need to vote.

You'd probably have better luck getting people to vote by making it easier for them (i.e. the info I posted) or giving them reasons to vote. I don't believe scolding people ever works.
(BTW I've voted in every election I could since I became eligible)

This is a very #GoodNYC idea!

Thanks for the suggestion!

I love NYC. If you can afford the move / have a job then heck yes!