Submitted by DoctorSteve t3_yqcf9e in Pennsylvania

And if we do flip it, we need to immediately set about voting rights, gerrymandering removal, and I'd even go as far as to rethink the House itself. Too easy to get a Red Majority with how it's structured.

This state has so much it needs to fix that has been continually sabotaged by Republicans for no reason except spite and hate for the citizens of Pennsylvania. Let's flip the house and let's get to work.

100

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Sovereign2142 t1_ivnsw9x wrote

Honestly, why do we need a bicameral legislature? It’s not like senators represent any different interests than the house representatives (unlike the federal senate). It’s just more gridlock and government salaries.

59

QueueWho t1_ivo2qe1 wrote

I wonder if we could shrink the legislature if we had a single house, where the lowest population County gets one rep, and the highest population county gets a proportional number of reps by their difference in population size. It would certainly more accurately represent the demographics of the state, and eliminate jerrymandering.

20

Lumeria t1_ivodqnq wrote

You see, the problem with that is if we did that we’d theoretically have nearly 3000 representatives for closest-to-proportional seat distribution. Cameron County has 4500 residents, making it the smallest county, and we have 13 million people, for reference.

It’s honestly be better to either eliminate the Senate and simply add those seats into the house pool (so 253 seats total) or eliminate the Senate and adhere to the Cube Root Rule (235 seats).

18

QueueWho t1_ivoeor0 wrote

jesus can we just wrap them into their neighbor county? Had no idea some were that small.

7

Lumeria t1_ivog5c4 wrote

After Cameron, there’s Sullivan and Forest Counties that both under 10k population as well (6000 and 7000-ish respectively). If I’d had to guess, they probably roll some of their county operations in with their neighbors (or, at least, I know some counties do that).

As a fun fact, out of 67 counties, 27~ of them are smaller than the average state house seat currently.

12

QueueWho t1_ivohlgq wrote

So they are over represented AND jerrymandered.

17

cowboyjosh2010 t1_ivpn6it wrote

I recently did a deep dive of populations on a city/town level basis in Pennsylvania. There are 2,570 towns/cities/boroughs/whatevers in PA, and the average population size is 5,046 people per city/town. 26% of our population lives in a town/borough that is smaller than this average, but they're spread out over approximately 1,600 towns. Literally almost 2/3 of the cities/towns/boroughs in PA are so small that they're smaller than the average. No wonder so many in this state have a hard time accepting that the cities really do pack a voting punch! Most of the towns you encounter are miniscule by comparison

Here's another fun one: if you take the bottom-1,000 ranking of towns by size (so, like, start with Centralia at literally just 4 residents, and add up towns as they increase in size to the one thousandth bigger town from there), you get a population of about 1.276 million, or roughly 10% of the state, spread out over 39% of the towns. That sounds like a lot of people, until you realize that the city of Philadelphia alone has more residents than that. It's so big, that you could spot Pittsburgh's 300,000 residents to these bottom-1,000 towns by size, and they'd STILL only just barely have as many people as Philadelphia does.

Population distribution is a wild thing.

3

BluCurry8 t1_ivoxi6m wrote

We have been asking for them to reduce the legislature for over 20 years. It is the most expensive in the country.

4

Brigadier_Beavers t1_ivomzq0 wrote

I think its a holdover from Philly being the US capital long ago and the state wanted to mirror the federal government. Admittedly though without the state senate PA would be more conservative-representing. Pennsyltucky is real.

Edit: not saying theres more R than D voters in total, but gerrymandering and voter restrictions would be worse today if not for the state senate existing.

5

Sovereign2142 t1_ivonxay wrote

That's exactly it, according to Wikipedia, the General Assembly actually was unicameral until 1791. Just 4 years after the Constitution was adopted.

Realistically, with multi-member districts and rank-choice voting we could eliminate a lot of the geographic advantage that Republicans have and get a legislature that more closely represents the voters' will. A unicameral legislature is just one part of it.

5

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivpk4bg wrote

We need to do that. We can't let these empty rural counties dominate our politics if PA is going to be a modern state.

2

dementedturnip26 t1_ivnuhu2 wrote

I didn’t even think this was a possibility…I guess running lunatics like mastriano really did backfire

38

mattd1972 t1_ivo895e wrote

I still find the press conference that Marino & Barletta ran after the primary bitching about losing Trump’s endorsement comical.

13

Level-Adventurous t1_ivo56es wrote

Legalize weed, privatize the lcb

30

Sunkitteh t1_ivon5w8 wrote

Maryland voted to legalize it. We are surrounded.

20

PPQue6 t1_ivp35pa wrote

Not quite, Ohio and WV still are no where near getting recreational any time soon. Thankfully NY is just a short drive away.

Edit: Oh and I guess Delaware too...

5

pwnedkiller t1_ivp4e1p wrote

Ohio sucks I can’t imagine why anyone would wanna live there.

7

PPQue6 t1_ivp512h wrote

Have lived there (Columbus, Cleveland, Canton) can confirm it does suck.

7

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivpk8qu wrote

We could have legalized weed and gay marriage first and been a tourism leader. It is a failure of the state. I want to fix that.

3

starcom_magnate t1_ivobdo2 wrote

It doesn't look great, right now, but it does seem very possible that the Dems will pick up at least 10 or 11 seats, and put the split around 104-99, which is much better than what it has been for them.

24

cowboyjosh2010 t1_ivpnewl wrote

Yeah, Democrats would have to pick up every single un-called state house seat that is even remotely leaning Dem at the moment JUST to have a chance of taking the majority. It almost certainly won't come to pass that they will, but it's wild that they're this close.

7

cutiecat565 t1_ivohsco wrote

Me: complains about NY/NJ folks who moved here in droves and made housing unaffordable Also me: look at voting map and thanks NY/NJ people for clearing house on the eastern border

16

Sovereign2142 t1_ivom9af wrote

Actually, while the Eastern counties did their job and held strong, it's the rural red counties that really helped the Democrats win. Check out the New York Times' shift map. Pennsyltuckians really came out for Fetterman and Shapiro in greater numbers than Biden could pull in 2020.

17

enz1ey t1_ivooiz0 wrote

Yeah I have had a few close friends/family who are typically straight-ticket Republicans tell me they're voting Fetterman/Shapiro.

7

cutiecat565 t1_ivoqore wrote

I can't access that map. When I look at CNN, the rural red counties are still red.

4

timewellwasted5 t1_ivorbuq wrote

It's not about them being red, it's about the margins. CNN was reviewing the red PA counties around Pittsburgh late last night. For example, there was a red county where Biden got something like 40% of the vote. Fetterman got 46% in the same county, meaning he still 'lost' the county but had better margins. That's what they mean about the red counties propelling him to victory.

So if let's say Biden lost a sample county of 1,000 people with 40% of the vote, he got 400 votes. From that same pool of voters, Fetterman pulled 46% of the vote and thus got 460 votes. It was little stuff like that all over the state in red districts that really put Fetterman over the top.

8

cutiecat565 t1_ivot7j0 wrote

Kind seems like a stretch to say they came out in droves. Oh look, 6% of the county was less awful that two years. The margins are still incredibly embarrassing in most of the red counties. I see tons of 60%+ for Mastriano and OZ.

2

timewellwasted5 t1_ivots39 wrote

Can you show me where I said they came out in droves? You said it seems like a stretch to say that, but I don’t see where I said that.

3

cutiecat565 t1_ivouq24 wrote

Your supporting the above post that is making it sound like Moses himself came down yesterday to open the Susquehanna and allow the democrats to vote in large numbers in the rural counties

−2

timewellwasted5 t1_ivovloo wrote

>is making it sound like Moses himself came down

I showed where a 6% increase occurred. Your statement is ridiculously dramatic...

4

cutiecat565 t1_ivoxncg wrote

But at the end of the day, 6% isn't great. Pittsburgh and the eastern counties are still holding the whole state up.

0

timewellwasted5 t1_ivoy1il wrote

>6% isn't great

I also didn't say it was great. I was explaining how Fetterman outperformed Biden in these counties. You seriously created a whole conversation in your head and are arguing with me about it.

- I never said 'droves'

- I never said 'great'

4

cutiecat565 t1_ivoybje wrote

Ok. Have a lovely day. Hope the stick up your butt doesn't hurt too much.

1

timewellwasted5 t1_ivp00n3 wrote

You as well. Best of luck on improving your reading comprehension skills.

0

cutiecat565 t1_ivp0rm2 wrote

Thank you! I just got a 97% of MBA capstone project for excellence in analyzing the case study. Can't wait to get 100% the next time I get a masters degree!

1

timewellwasted5 t1_ivp2kuv wrote

A good score on an MBA capstone project is very impressive from someone who couldn't comprehend my two paragraph Reddit post. Good for you man.

0

_token_black t1_ivoupzn wrote

Allegheny County was a 7 point swing in a county with 550k votes. Westmoreland was a 9 point swing in a county with about 175k.

All those rural counties are dark red but Oz didn’t put up many 40 point swings like Trump could. It all adds up.

1

_token_black t1_ivou7zw wrote

I keep saying all those 7-10 point swings for Fetterman added up. Same thing he did in the primary.

3

GraffitiTavern t1_ivoq534 wrote

I remember my senior year of high school(2015-16), we could barely stay open because the legislature blocked school funding for a while. I would be so happy seeing low-income schools finally getting the funding they need.

4

[deleted] t1_ivodbau wrote

[deleted]

3

SamuelLCompassion t1_ivokjmf wrote

Republicans need one of these two guys to win or it will:

  • Todd Polinchock, currently trails by 17 votes
  • Todd Stephens, currently leads by 26 votes

We're talking about wildly small vote margins, every vote truly counts in this one. And the mail-in ballots are what is still being counted...

9

ravenx92 t1_ivok7eu wrote

I'm not seeing results for my district... What's up with that?? Have they not started counting some yet??

3

Regular_Heron_8914 t1_ivqbpxl wrote

Amen! If you want to help fight the gerrymandering, sign up or at least watch the news of, https://www.fairdistrictspa.com/

I remember the R's trying to pass a law that the state legislature could ignore the Governor in a state of emergency, that BTW, they could declare. Does anyone know if that ever passed? PA could still be in trouble if that passed.

3

BonusUpbeat t1_ivqipz0 wrote

The state constitution was amended to limit disaster emergency declarations issued by the governor to 21 days. After that it must be extended by the general assembly. Prior to the pandemic there was no time limit for the governor's declarations.

4

yo2sense t1_ivnvbo5 wrote

Is this really possible?

2

berraberragood t1_ivosfjx wrote

Polinchock appears to have lost. Stephens is up by ~30 votes atm, but there are still a few hundred uncounted mail-in/absentees, so’s he’s not looking good.

3

your_late t1_ivozdfk wrote

Lol I probably literally caused him to lose myself with all the neighbors I pestered

3

IrrumaboMalum t1_ivnx0f9 wrote

Not for at least a decade and a lot more NJer and NYers coming to PA to live.

3

Gymfrog007 t1_ivozr92 wrote

Too easy to get a red majority with a minority of votes/people. *****

2

drunkmonkey176 t1_ivplm2b wrote

Gerrymandering seriously needs addressed. I'm so fucking sick of a clear majority of PA residents being subject to the douchebaggery of primitive screw-heads!

2

c0lin268 t1_ivr8vze wrote

I really hope this is the beginning of a blue wave for Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is a Northeastern state and its time it starts to behave like one

2

Chuck1705 t1_ivod9xc wrote

Looks like 99 wins in 203 races...

1

Chuck1705 t1_ivt4dx6 wrote

Make that 102 wins in 203 races!!! Dems have a 1 seat majority in PA!!!!!

1

300blakeout t1_ivr3ji5 wrote

I hate freedom. I like the govern me harder daddy kink. Brain dead? Sure!… But ignorance is bliss!

0

akadmin t1_ivq7594 wrote

"if we flip the state house we need to make sure republicans never win again regardless of how people vote"

Beautifully said. Not at all unreasonable.

−1

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivqco9u wrote

That's not what I said.

If you're scared get a dog.

3

floridaman1984 t1_ivpz8os wrote

So the daily shootings in PHILA don't give you faith ??????

−2

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivq5k3a wrote

Now that we have Democratic control, we can do something about the shootings. That's why I have faith.

2

floridaman1984 t1_ivq8204 wrote

Wait , who's the mayor of PHILA ?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

−1

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivqcjnb wrote

Do you think the Mayor of Philadelphia is the person preventing gun control?

2

floridaman1984 t1_ivqlcmq wrote

He's just defunding the police along with that crack prosecutor 👍🏼

1

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivqx4gh wrote

You know that's not what's happening. Why are you lying on the internet?

1

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivr3y7p wrote

Did you read that article? This has nothing to do with cutting funding for the police. This is an article on cuts made to the city budget due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Here is a real article.

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/philadelphia/philadephia-police-get-budget-increase-antiviolence-funding-20220627.html

>"The city is set to approve a $30 million budget increase to the Police Department and a handful of other investments outside traditional law enforcement that are aimed at combatting gun violence.

>"All told, the investments bring the Police Department’s allocation to nearly $800 million — the most of any city agency, and $150 million more than in 2016, when Kenney took office."

So I ask you again - why are you lying on the internet?

1

floridaman1984 t1_ivr4aso wrote

Lmao - nice try - RE-read the original article !!!!!!!!!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

2

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivr5syk wrote

I did read the article. Did you?

For example, you would hate what this money was actually for. "The preliminary budget includes several police reform measures including body cameras for officers, implicit bias training in addition to the use of mental health professionals for police-assisted diversion."

Is that funding for the police? Are those things you want from the police? I wouldn't be surprised if the police wanted them cut from the funding.

Secondly, from the article again: > “It is extremely disappointing that at this time we are not able to move forward with some of the crucial investments I proposed back in March, before the pandemic and resulting economic downtown were felt in Philadelphia. And it pains me that this budget reduces some City services and eliminates hundreds of jobs. Still, we have prioritized core services, protected our most vulnerable residents, and maintained our financial flexibility to enable a quick rebound. In short, thanks to Council’s leadership, I believe this budget will accomplish the goal I laid out on May 1: we will keep all Philadelphians safe, healthy, and educated while maintaining core municipal services that our residents rely on daily. Just as importantly, the most difficult decisions were made through a lens of racial equity. The budget intentionally limits the impact of service delays or cuts on people of color, who are disproportionately impacted by the virus and already suffering from decades of systemic inequality. I look forward to final approval by City Council on June 25.”

This is an article on coronavirus affecting the city budget. Not cutting funding for the police. That is why I showed you Mayor Kenney increasing Philadelphia budget to its highest ever. Because this is not about cutting funding for the police.

1

[deleted] t1_ivp8o5u wrote

Your state Is gonna get what it's asking for, let's see how you like what you get...

−5

That_Checks t1_ivoqi46 wrote

"We?" Isn't there a political sub somewhere for this?

−7

Brigadier_Beavers t1_ivosiia wrote

'We' being the majority of Pennsylvanians.

10

That_Checks t1_ivoxyhe wrote

Cute. But until, and if, it happens.... The "we" you refer to as technically the minority then. Either way... Somebody should make a PA Politics sub and keep r/Pennsylvania beautiful.

−16

princeoinkins t1_ivou569 wrote

um, I'd really not prefer a completly blue legislature, thanks. We need balance.

−12

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivouyd4 wrote

How's "balance" worked for PA for 20 years?

12

princeoinkins t1_ivoyh2h wrote

fine for me, no complaints.

I mean, the roads suck.....

−12

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivoyyqw wrote

How's that attempt at an abortion ban going? Is that "fine"?

8

princeoinkins t1_ivp0x7s wrote

God... that's why I said BALANCE.

you'll never get an abortion ban with a blue governor or senate, and you'll never get a firearm ban or astronomical taxes (well hopefully) with a red house.

−9

[deleted] t1_ivoymcj wrote

Idiots voting democrat. Do you want 75% of your paycheck to be in taxes, $5 gas prices, and $100 grocery bills every visit? Like what the fuck goes on in your thick heads, fooled by democrat reverse psychology tricks yet again

−19

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivozydx wrote

Yeah yeah buddy keep on screaming into the wind.

10

[deleted] t1_ivp06ch wrote

Lol you don’t even acknowledge any of those realities. Probably another stimulus check leech.

−9

[deleted] t1_ivp624j wrote

[deleted]

5

[deleted] t1_ivp6hsa wrote

MYbe for you If you have a < 40k salary

−2

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivpjs2c wrote

Do you think people who make less than 40k are better off?

Only the rich are struggling? If you make under 40k it's a paradise?

Is this your actual thought process?!?

2

[deleted] t1_ivp6j6j wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_ivp7a37 wrote

That’s all you got? Mobile irrelevant typos?

2

[deleted] t1_ivp7cxw wrote

[deleted]

2

[deleted] t1_ivp7hq0 wrote

Ironic your salary must be under 40k, yikes no wonder why you support democrats. You want free hand outs!

−1

[deleted] t1_ivp7kb7 wrote

[deleted]

3

[deleted] t1_ivp7zt6 wrote

I really don’t care what you are. Just saying the things I’ve pointed out are indeed issues for many successful and hard working Americans with families. We don’t want our hard earned money going to social causes that just continue to promote violence, hate, and higher cost for everything. If these people actually were good people that be a different story. Instead we get gangs fighting downtown, shootings at parties, robberies, theft, abortions, you name it. These people should be in jail.

0

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivpjy5t wrote

Are you out here saying that no one making under 40k is hard working?

Seriously what is your logic? You have this vendetta against the poor?

Also - do you think people who get abortions should be in jail?!?

3

Thats_classified t1_ivp8rfh wrote

It's because inflation is literally a global problem right now, not the result of any single policy except the smoke in mirrors that lets corporations price gouge to drive it and COL up. I wonder which party is actually trying to do something about this, and which is standing in the way....hmmm.....real thinker, huh?

2

[deleted] t1_ivp9fti wrote

Democrats solution to this is taxing the hell out of the upper middle class. That’s bullshit.

2

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivpjzsu wrote

Thanks to Republicans there is no more upper middle class.

2

[deleted] t1_ivpkhl3 wrote

Everything you say now has become irrelevant. The republicans want to lower taxes not raise them. Democrats want to raise taxes and steal your wealth. This is the #1 reason why I will never vote democrat. Crazy how you say the complete opposite. You have it all mixed up. More reverse psychology going on with you.

−1

DoctorSteve OP t1_ivpu2d2 wrote

Republicans do not lower taxes. I don't know where you got this idea from. I know they say they will lower your taxes, but all they do is give the rich gigantic tax breaks. This is a historical, proven fact. If you want to show me the large middle class gains during Republican leadership, please do so.

Republicans have only shrunk the middle class.

2

Gymfrog007 t1_ivp2ga0 wrote

Inflation is a world issue right now, and the U.S. is handling it better than most of the world. Human rights are way more important to me. Having services for people who are struggling, and need a safety net are wonderful. Everyone should have health care that isn’t tied to their job. Everyone should be able to feel safe from bigotry, misogyny, racism etc.. . That my fellow Pennsylvanian is worth more the price of gas. (Which is controlled by the 1%)

6

[deleted] t1_ivp45jc wrote

What do you mean human rights? This country has more freedom than any country in the world. What about feeling safe against hate groups? Antifa? The amount of hate crime and violence these groups have started is insane. Destroying and stealing from stores and cities. Blaming the police. The left feeds off this shit

−7

Gymfrog007 t1_ivp9cj0 wrote

Everyone should feel safe. You are absolutely 💯 right.
There is no place for bigotry, racism, and misogyny.

They way that "antifa" handles their movement is wrong, but their belief is correct. They want to stand against fascist, racist, and extreme right wingers who want to take away rights for humans.

Other hate groups that would include "KKK" "proud boys" "neo-nazis" "identity church" should also not be tolerated as well

2

[deleted] t1_ivp9wdk wrote

The far left is essentially communism, antifa is a part of that.

−4

Gymfrog007 t1_ivpat4n wrote

Their view is that fascism, racism, white supremacy is wrong, and oppose those who think it is right. Although I agree with their beliefs, I do not agree with how they express their beliefs.

Do you agree with their beliefs, or do you think that racism, bigotry, fascism etc are things to be supporting?

1

[deleted] t1_ivpbwsq wrote

Racism exists however I don’t think it’s as bad as the media portrays it. It’s always a hard thing to prove. Saying some is racist is just an opinion. Saying some is violent is pretty obvious. I don’t support any of this nonsense. Both parties have bad eggs. Republicans to me are lesser of two evils. The democrats make shit up and want socialism. Obama, aoc, Biden are all horrible people. Trump has a big ego and I don’t like that but deep down I believe he’s a good person. He creates jobs, boosts the economy, wants America to succeed. The media just twists everything because he’s no a politician. Their jobs and careers are at stake with him in office. He’s a threat to them so they will make it their lives mission to destroy him by making shit up and lying to the people.

−1

Gymfrog007 t1_ivpfdeq wrote

We can agree on some points. Extremist are not good, they're are bad people on both sides. I would disagree with you that Trump wants people to succeed. I would disagree on claims that Trump created a lot of jobs. When Trump took office, the US was going on 11 years of economic expansion. Under Obama's last 3 years (36 months) job growth averaged 227,000 a month. During Trumps first 36 he was averaging 191,000. So job growth went down (and then covid hit, so we can't really compare numbers after that) Under Obama average household income increased about $5000 in his last 2 years, under Trump average household income only grew about $1500 in his first 2 years.

Racism is worse than you imagine. I have several friends of different backgrounds (Black, middle eastern, hispanic)(most of who I have served in the army with) who tell me that they fear for their Iives of they are ever pulled over for any reason. I have seen racism first hand with vulgarities shouted at them. I have had a privileged upbringing, being a white male in suburban Philadelphia, who has two parents that were teachers. I used to think that racism didn't exist, because for the first 18-20 years of my life, I had never seen it.

2

[deleted] t1_ivpk47s wrote

Well I think the root cause are stereotypes. When you see a thug looking black guy lots of people think criminal, when you see a Muslim with a beard lots of people think terrorist, when you see a reclusive white kid in school kids think school shooter. It’s a shame these labels have become a reality and the good people of these races and religion become victim. Unfortunately families have lost loved ones to these kind of situations. It’s hard to erase that.

1

your_late t1_ivp3v13 wrote

Shit I'd want my kids to be better at math than you at least

2

[deleted] t1_ivp4pjk wrote

Don’t worry Your kids won’t be learning about math. They will be learning about supporting lgbtq and blm hate cults.

0

hissingwhirr t1_ivpkgav wrote

Your worldview is strange! Can't tell if funny, sad, both...

2

[deleted] t1_ivpup21 wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_ivpxenk wrote

You’re right it is way more. The point being if you’re not dirt poor you better have a big pocket to pay for all these expenses

1

hissingwhirr t1_ivq6f03 wrote

If you're struggling with affording groceries, you can learn about applying for EBT benefits in PA here

1

Knarrenheinz1989 t1_ivnti2f wrote

My vote helped flip my house district red for the first time in almost 30 years.

−46

nouveau_user t1_ivo4ylo wrote

You're honestly boasting that you help set your district back 70 years?

31

AlienOverlord53 t1_ivo4dvj wrote

Sorry bud, this is reddit. No freedom of speech, only "dems good, republicans bad"

−39

FarmersHusband t1_ivo4pbs wrote

How do you guys still have no idea what free speech is?

39

paperdolllll t1_ivo5mla wrote

It's so bad that I almost think they must be doing it intentionally.

17

No-Professional-1884 t1_ivo7up5 wrote

Reddit has the same proportionate amount of Dems and Repubs as real life, it’s just here it’s not gerrymandered

22

Doug4Prison t1_ivobqod wrote

It is crazy how they let people vote that don't know that freedom of speech doesn't extend to a private company. Wild

17

AlienOverlord53 t1_ivocpkv wrote

🤣 my point is that if you voice a right leaning belief, you get talked down to and looked down on. A left belief is applauded and cheered. Another post on this sub said "there are too many political signs up, we should stop creating so much litter" and the guy who said "yeah I'm sick of seeing FJB and Trump signs" got 40+upvotes amd people agreeing, and the guy who said "yeah I'm sick of seeing Bernie sanders signs" got downvoted into oblivion. Despite the fact that the entire post was about signs as a whole, not certain party signs. So both statements should be viewed equally

Saying that republicans have freedom of speech in 2022 is like saying the LGBT community had it in the 80s. Sure, you can voice your opinion, but nobody is going to like it.

−18

Shawna_Love t1_ivoj1jj wrote

My brother in Christ, you are witnessing free speech in action. You are just on the unpopular end of it in this particular scenario.

19

Doug4Prison t1_ivoiq9o wrote

"Free speech (tm) is something I just totally and arbitrarily made up because it makes my feels feel good"

ok dude sure

9

LordShtark t1_ivog86h wrote

Rs are soooo repressed /s You got your head so far up your ass you can't smell the shit anymore. Since when has people agreeing with your opinions had anything to do with freedom of speech? You just compared republicans to a minority group that was (and still is) being persecuted by republicans. How a human brain can not see the absolute ridiculousness of that statement is beyond me.

8

AlienOverlord53 t1_ivogcsu wrote

Did I say repressed? And the only thing I compared is how their speech is demonized

−9

Brigadier_Beavers t1_ivos4xj wrote

Im sorry real life has a liberal bias lol

7

LordShtark t1_ivohay6 wrote

Yes. When you compared republicans to the very people they repress you said repressed. ffs

6

Valcon2723 t1_ivom6iy wrote

Maybe it's because you rarely see a Bernie sign and it's not as big of an eye sore as driving up the street with an obnoxious amount or giant trump sign. I don't think I've ever even see a massive Bernie sign. I understand what you are saying but they are two completely different levels of annoying.

4

AlienOverlord53 t1_ivod3lx wrote

Just to clarify, my ideology leans left, but wow are the democrats stupid sometimes. Yall think "my way or the highway" and don't budge an inch. And then get mad at the Republicans for doing the same.

"Well my way is better" welcome to Earth. Everyone thinks that their point of view is the perfect/least flawed one. But unless you're even willing to listen to the other side, you're just as guilty

−3

Brigadier_Beavers t1_ivorts8 wrote

Notice how your comment is still there? The downvotes dont mean you cant talk, they just mean no one here agrees with you.

And clearly, the state at-large disagreed with you too lmao

5

joefred111 t1_ivosjbt wrote

TIL that downvoting and even just disagreeing with someone is considered a free speech violation.

Your inner fascist is showing, buddy!

4