Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

fordry t1_j55rdgt wrote

In other words, their system for managing that data is not properly setup to ensure security of private data...

156

AdUnfair1643 t1_j55sc2r wrote

I have seen absolutely nothing but absolute incompetence from local government and businesses since we’ve moved here. I wasn’t surprised when I received my letter.

7

Ben_A t1_j55v065 wrote

Worked at dominos as a delivery driver. For some reason my manager sent my full name, address, social security number, and license number to someone I delivered to. I do not know why. He’s just dumb.

22

Cuidado_roboto t1_j55wkwp wrote

Ok, but requests for voter registration info is sus, is it not? What’s their motivation and who has the time for that?

28

blaaguuu t1_j55z79q wrote

While this is a pretty shitty situation - I feel like you have to give out your last 4 to so many institutions, and there is no way to validate that any of them have decent security practices, so I generally assume that the 'last 4' might as well be treated as public info, already...

49

TVDinner360 t1_j564swe wrote

It’s hella common. Political parties and candidates do it routinely. It’s how they decide how to market candidates to you. For example, if they see you only vote in presidential elections, they might not bother to market to you as heavily as someone who votes in every election. But if you vote in every election, you will get ALL THE FLYERS until you turn in your ballot. Yes, they track that, too. Flyers are pricey.

37

rosesandpiglets t1_j569719 wrote

I’m usually not a very litigious person, but you might want to talk to a lawyer. Breaking federal law and saying “oh whoops” “we fixed it and totally trust this dude” doesn’t cut it IMO. They need to provide legal documentation that they did what they said at the bare minimum.

5

CWcooper2 t1_j56rcve wrote

And this is why I don’t give out my personal information to local or federal government

−9

Macemore t1_j56rd91 wrote

Same here. Must have been a lot bigger than theyre reporting. I'm wondering if there's any legal action we can take, how can we verify it was only the last four? What caused this and how is it not going to happen again? I have LifeLock from UW because they lost a hard drive that could have had my information on it. Why isn't Peirce doing something similar for the individuals affected by this?

1

Macemore t1_j56rld7 wrote

What's even scarier is how easy it is to get someone's SSN just by knowing some details about them, they did t randomize SSNs until around 2008. So you're saying they have the last four (the only random part) and all the information necessary to get the other 7 digits? Hmmm

9

herbnoh t1_j56shgq wrote

Didn’t divulge personal info of “Requester” though, why not just all get on the same page, what’s that auditors SSN, I pay their salary anyway, just tell me who’s asking about me.

4

MJBrune t1_j57dh66 wrote

The question is, why are voters' addresses and birthdays public information?

6

TheTarquin t1_j57dlrx wrote

Just a little oopsie-doodle privacy breach.

2

Macemore t1_j57fa25 wrote

Yeah I counted wrong, I even remember thinking "7 has to be wrong" but I posted it anyway. I think we all understand the gist of what I was saying, the first 5 digits are based off locations of birth and certificate registration, the last 4 are sequential (basically random from guessing perspective). It's actually scary how little security there is with SSNs especially knowing the potential damage.

1

MJBrune t1_j57giij wrote

The government already knows your name (you legally have to provide one at birth.) They also know your address because you provide one if you own the house, if you don't there are numerous systems that require you to provide a mailing address, and Washington state IDs require one. They also already know your phone number if it's a landline or can get it from the mobile company at the drop of a hat if it's a cell phone.

So really of the things you mentioned. The phone number is maybe the only thing that the government doesn't have direct access to. Maybe they don't have your address if you've avoided filling out government forms like taxes but likely you are just breaking the law at that point.

3

Bigseth0416 t1_j57gkrh wrote

This is actually a pretty common scam for government and why some sectors charge a large fee per page of information. One might for example use the freedom information act to obtain documents/emails from the purchasing department of what ever government entity and hope someone does not notice a credit card number or other sensitive information that was not redacted.

5

MJBrune t1_j57hfjj wrote

it's because SSNs were simply supposed to be ID tax numbers that you could give to anyone. Someone knowing your tax number wasn't meant to confirm your identity. It was just supposed to track how much you put into Social Security. The IRS tried to prevent people from using it as an ID security measure but eventually just gave up.

It's like how business EIN operates. It's literally just a number to track the taxes that the business is responsible for. In some cases it even replaces the business owner's SSN on some forms.

4

Macemore t1_j57hzy1 wrote

Wow that makes a lot of sense, thank you! It's sad that the IRS tried and they failed. I've wondered why it was so cavalier to give my EIN out, I figured it must not mean as much as the SSN and now I know why!

4

PNW_Explorer_16 t1_j57i82j wrote

Based on your username, I get the sense you understand PII and possibly GDPR rules. So you know at a corporate level how serious these things can get.

As with anything, there are loop holes, which I understand. However, a “whoops, trust our guy it was handled in two hours” is negligent.

What I’d like to see is a security audit within pierce county (digital and physical). how records are stored, kept, shared, etc. next, an audit on personnel security levels, and a chain of command for releasing records.

In the event of a breach, what’s the protocol, and how does the county plan to mitigate risk, while protecting its people. A “oh it’s totally cool” piece of mail isn’t on par with standards of where we should be.

Next, what entity requested our data? If it was a company, they should be listed, and we should have communication options to address directly with them. If this was a personal (non entity) request, that person should have a representative from pierce county tagged so we can understand the intent on which this person requested our data.

Lastly, comes the monetary side. While no one may be victim to identity theft which, may lead to erroneous monetary charges, there should be a plan in place to address this should it occur. Pierce had an obligation to help it’s citizens. Listing the three credit agencies doesn’t suffice.

Lastly, let’s say that someone, or a group, is targeted (harassment, violence, etc). This again falls into malicious intent, but dives into more murky waters.

I don’t have the answers. This is just what comes to mind. I’m not a “let’s sue and get everything we can” kinda person. I’m more of a “hey, let’s be a leading example for privacy of our citizens data, and also a leader in mitigating risk to its citizens” kinda guy.

7

SoftwarePatient5050 t1_j581tae wrote

That does not appear to apply here:

>Binds only federal agencies and covers only records under the control of federal agencies (and, by contract, also applies to contractor personnel and systems used by a federal agency to maintain the records).

1

KittenKoder t1_j583u1g wrote

This is what happens when you don't hire computer literate people to operate computers. I bet the clerk is not paid enough to do this job too.

Don't cheap out on your IT, it's a stupid mistake that many organizations and businesses have been doing lately and all this shit will y2k if if continues.

2

discodawg02 t1_j58bfob wrote

I got the same letter. Should I do anything?

0

Zer0sober t1_j58dvov wrote

I got the same notice... funny how so many people were included in something that was not "widespread".... smfh

2

0112358g t1_j58h4qx wrote

I GOT THAT IN THE MAIL YESTERDAY MORNING; I’m pissed af

1

lumbersom t1_j58ner5 wrote

As if just deleting from their computer is simply enough to ensure recovery safety.

1

Sure-Survey9192 t1_j59m9xl wrote

Never registering for voters card ever again no matter where i live this is ridiculous.

1

GlobalCodec t1_j5aqyc5 wrote

Probably should have ran the release past legal before releasing :')

1

Gigglenator t1_j5chzyp wrote

Everyone in my house got this letter. They fucked up big time.

1

hham42 t1_j5fcduv wrote

Ok guys, they didn’t “ask nicely”- the person the information was sent to allowed the Pierce County IT group to go onto their laptop, into their email and full delete the file and any trace of it. Your information is safer than any of the six or so notices you’ve gotten from other data breaches. (That number is an assumption based on my experiences, it seems like every six months I’m notified of a data breach and they just offer me credit monitoring for another year.)

1