Submitted by Hi_its_GOD t3_zzej0r in dataisbeautiful
Comments
Final_Good_Bye t1_j2bes8b wrote
But it says Pete is #1.
timmoReddit t1_j2baveh wrote
He's such a lite weight
NyanCatMatt t1_j2coije wrote
Here I was trying to figure out what Hope did to get left with most of the trash.
eniadcorlet t1_j2dt6fs wrote
He should hang out with Jeff
This-Inflation7440 t1_j2f6f69 wrote
me and my homies hate Pete
Thromocrat t1_j2d1l7l wrote
Kudos to you for actually sharing data that is interesting and not just humble bragging about your income.
[deleted] t1_j2dph5r wrote
[deleted]
StoicStone001 t1_j2dwbow wrote
“Look at this Mayo we can afford for our sauces!”
bumbletowne t1_j2b7fm3 wrote
The meaning is a bit lost in discourse. What do the acronyms stand for?
mimprocesstech t1_j2cakli wrote
- PETE (more commonly PET) is PolyEthylene Terephthalate.
- HDPE is High Density PolyEthylene
- PVC is PolyVinyl Chloride
- PP is PolyPropylene
- PS is PolyStyrene
Source: I've been working with plastics for ~10 years.
johnnymetoo t1_j2ccocg wrote
Are the ketchup packets made of LDPE?
mimprocesstech t1_j2cdxw4 wrote
Most are yes, along with a foil liner that prevents their recycling, but helps preserve the ketchup or something.
newaccountzuerich t1_j2cxglm wrote
The foil layer is an oxygen-impermeable layer.
Thin plastics can slowly allow gases to cross, and without the foil layer the shelf life of the contents would be reduced.
Saxonbrun t1_j2deg3p wrote
Additionally the acidity of ketchup will eat through most plastic. Ketchup bottles are made of PET which isn't affected by the acidity, along with a small amount of EVOH to serve as an oxygen barrier to prevent spoilage.
swaggyxwaggy t1_j2diuoc wrote
extra virgin olive hoil
BujuArena t1_j2clls4 wrote
Thank you for this amazing comment. Do you happen to also have ideas about the recycling implications of these plastics worldwide? I'm curious if they can all be recycled in Norway but some can't be in North America because of lacking technology.
mimprocesstech t1_j2cq1p8 wrote
From what I know, all are recyclable with caveats, some of which I will mention below. NA doesn't lack the tech, it's more realistically the motivation, there's generally no money in it unless it's sorted, sorting takes money, so very often it is sold to poorer countries or countries like China where it can be sorted relatively cheaply or incinerated as fuel to generate electricity.
Other considerations are things like FDA and others regulations that prevent something that has been to a consumer (all of us) from going back into the production stream for use in medical or food/beverage containers for health/safety reasons. I'm not sure if it's because they fear a virus may survive the manufacturing processes (almost impossible, unless it's purely a clean and reuse type of thing) or because thermal degradation of the regrind material or material mixed with others containing different additives could affect the packaging (far more likely, especially in the case of PolyStyrene [PS] that uses foaming agents often to make Expanded PolyStyrene [EPS]--like foam cups that McDonald's used to have). It's also why mixed material packaging, like ketchup packets with foil liners and milk cartons can't be recycled, the outer carton is paper, but there is a plastic liner inside of it.
AlaninMadrid t1_j2d1249 wrote
There is some concern about contaminants in recycled PET leeching into water sold in bottles utilising recycled PET. Theories include printing ink, adhesive, labels and "dirt" - hence a general preference for virgin material.
RandomUsername12123 t1_j2dckeo wrote
>It's also why mixed material packaging, like ketchup packets with foil liners and milk cartons can't be recycled, the outer carton is paper
Ketchup packs are just too small and not worth even trying to recycle, inceneration is the best way to dispose of it.
With the proper configuration and air filtration there is no environmental impact for the process
And the milk boxes are made of Tetra Pak, which is recyclable.
mimprocesstech t1_j2dt11n wrote
>Ketchup packs are just too small and not worth even trying to recycle, inceneration is the best way to dispose of it.
Good point.
>With the proper configuration and air filtration there is no environmental impact for the process
Very true, should've mentioned that.
>And the milk boxes are made of Tetra Pak, which is recyclable.
Did not know that. Cool. So whatever you buy your milk in, it's recyclable lol.
himmmmmmmmmmmmmm t1_j2dm0mn wrote
Well, you need a source of energy for the incinerator, and that has an environmental cost
RandomUsername12123 t1_j2dmt9e wrote
Plastics are just oil with extra steps, it autofuels itself and produce energy :)
The only problem would be if the stuff got wet and a few days under the sun solves that
hjake123 t1_j2dyiuy wrote
I mean I guess in a existential way any process, recycling or not, has an "environmental impact". If the only cost is energy, though, we could have that impact be pretty minimal.
RandomUsername12123 t1_j2dcbt8 wrote
>(unless it's purely a clean and reuse type of thing)
We have the tech for that too.
mimprocesstech t1_j2dsq6s wrote
Yes, just stating that the possibility of a virus surviving the process was greater instead of chopping up and reusing the plastic in something like injection molding where the melting temperature usually far exceeds the temperature a virus can live at. I didn't mean to imply it couldn't be done or isn't being done.
PM_me_punanis t1_j2dheih wrote
This is why I sort some packages as trash because I know there's plastic liners inside them. But people tell me to put them in the recycling bin. I'm like... They can't recycle this.. sigh. I feel like the pre-sorting that happens at home is just a feel good effort.
I am a medical professional and I have been wanting to know where our waste goes. I know most of our trash gets incinerated but it would be great to have a visual like this!
mimprocesstech t1_j2dwxgc wrote
Depends on whether or not it has been used. Anything that comes in contact with bodily fluids is supposed to be incinerated, irradiated, or steamed in an autoclave as you know. Lab fluids (not bodily fluids) have to be rendered inert chemically, but then can probably just be poured down the drain.
I guarantee a good portion of medical expenses is derived from disposal requirements. I would like to see if any bloodborne pathogens could survive regrinding and extrusion... then the only issue is how it's transported.
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2b9k1w wrote
They are the different kind of plastic that is commonly manufactured eg PETE being polyethylene terephthalate and labeled with a 1 in the recycling triangle, your 2 liter soda and clear juice bottles are usually PETE
Arquen_Marille t1_j2bab2y wrote
Any idea about the metal breakdown?
Neowynd101262 t1_j2blbh0 wrote
Foil came to mind but what else is the question
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2bn1c7 wrote
Mostly 10# cans and aerosol cans like whipped cream
Lu12k3r t1_j2cc58r wrote
What about steel sterno type cans?
linkuphost t1_j2bqrjt wrote
and when the dishwasher throws out the utensils so he or she doesn't want to wash them.
Grumzz t1_j2detb2 wrote
I read mental breakdown 🙃
Soulsuicide t1_j2c508y wrote
Soda cans maybe
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2b3ye6 wrote
Graph made using Sankeymatic https://sankeymatic.com/build/ and Data from US Foods and Sysco Invoice Statements
individ31 t1_j2ctsxv wrote
Thanks for already answering my question. Always wanted to know how to make them.
iammaxhailme t1_j2cysm6 wrote
Food waste?
BabysFirstBeej t1_j2d14va wrote
Not relevant to the data in question
autobulb t1_j2dglj5 wrote
Only 1.54 packets of ketchup in a week? Not bad!
No idea what the unit is from the graph itself.
rockytfs1 t1_j2dk7cs wrote
The unit is lbs. It's in the post title but I agree it should be on the graph as well
autobulb t1_j2e4ls8 wrote
Yea I was just being cheeky. I noticed it in the title after searching for a while in the graph. If it by chance gets posted somewhere else it would be useful to have all the information self contained in the graphic indeed.
Dry_Psychology513 t1_j2bivd6 wrote
Latex gloves. Interesting.
halcyon_luna t1_j2c5d4k wrote
What is the source of your PVC
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2c83mm wrote
Seran wrap
halcyon_luna t1_j2c9puj wrote
I believe PVC is being phased out/ has phased out in Saran Wrap production
hithisishal t1_j2dfvop wrote
Not for the stuff that wraps pallets. I also think not yet in food service, but not sure if that is ongoing or not.
halcyon_luna t1_j2eey8v wrote
pallet wrap is polyethylene- "stretch wrap"
wrap that comes over, say, a 6 pack of bottles or a 12 pack of boxes is polyethylene- "shrink wrap"
wrap that comes on a roll at costco to put over food is saran wrap. it used to be PVC but is transitioning to polyethylene because PVC is now considered unacceptable for food contact
hithisishal t1_j2etkem wrote
Yes, you are right about the pallet wraps.
Costco still sells PVC food cling wrap.
[deleted] t1_j2bakcm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2bfo9z wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2bqmrl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2btpd8 wrote
[removed]
Delicious-Wheel2876 t1_j2d14s1 wrote
hello! one question what program do you us?
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2ei1ut wrote
YellowSub70 t1_j2d7an0 wrote
This is just on-site, correct? Assuming waste generated for take-out orders would be on top of this.
mypod49 t1_j2dbpaj wrote
I can’t get the image of OP carefully weighing empty ketchup packets out of my head.
[deleted] t1_j2ei4w7 wrote
[removed]
Hiphoppapotamus t1_j2dg9i9 wrote
Is this in the US? I was over there recently and was pretty shocked at the quantity of disposable plastic. It’s much more substantial than the disposable plastic I’m used to too - the carrier bags are thicker, and food containers from supermarkets were almost like tupperware.
carpeson t1_j2dgnex wrote
Great graph, but can you write the weight also in [kg]? I want to be able to plug my reddit data into my equations without any uneccesary transformations.
IndustrialMenace t1_j2djw6t wrote
where are you using that much poly styrol?
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2ei984 wrote
Our take-out containers are styrofoam
IndustrialMenace t1_j2ejj2r wrote
Thank you.
Flames57 t1_j2dk2j7 wrote
I read lewd gloves, I'll see myself out.
CapGainsNoPains t1_j2dkovg wrote
How did you collect the data?
xBris18 t1_j2drtix wrote
I'm honestly surprised by the amount of polystyrene waste. What country is your diner in if I may ask? In most parts of Europe PS has virtually disappeared for the end consumer and - afaik - is also mostly replaced by other materials where possible in the commercial sector. But I might be wrong. Again, really surprised to see so much of it in your graph.
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2emfnt wrote
We are in the US. Our carryout containers are made out of polystyrene. There are alternatives but they are just made out of PP and there are some fibrous alternatives but they tend to be 3x the price while being an inferior quality. If it were up to me I'd switch but running the place with my elder brother so there is more that one person involved when making decisions :(
[deleted] t1_j2dvsz2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2e2efk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2fax52 wrote
[removed]
RoutineSuggestion798 t1_j2c6lm7 wrote
Latex gloves aren't plastic. Also there must be food and paper waste. And that's a staggering amount of unidentified metal. Sorry pal, this is bad.
Hi_its_GOD OP t1_j2c7zo9 wrote
You're right latex gloves are not plastic, the metal comes from aerosol (like whipped cream) and 10# cans which weigh a little over a half pound each. In a busy restaurant they add up.
Yea there is obviously food and paper waste but I was more interested in graphing wasteful packaging.
Just_wanna_talk t1_j2czdup wrote
I mean, it's titled "weekly plastic and metallic waste" not "weekly waste" not sure why the paper and food needs to be mentioned since it's not the subject.
misterpoopybutthole5 t1_j2b8gb5 wrote
That's kinda mean to Pete, He's doing his best