Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Captain_Alaska t1_je3py3x wrote

> The new micro-processor that will ship in the 15 Pro models will not only manage those tasks, but will also be able to immediately sense capacitive button presses, holds, and even detect their own version of 3D Touch with the new volume up/down button, action (currently ringer switch) button, and power button, while the phone is dead or powered down.

If the new button is gonna act like the AW Ultra’s action button and I can map shortcuts to it I would be so happy.

171

LinkBoating t1_je3tbi6 wrote

Leave it to Apple to over engineer and over complicate an already existing feature lol

Looks like it’ll enable really cool features at least!

234

Tmaster95 t1_je3vesj wrote

I’m so hyped for the new one! I’m instantly gonna switch

3

zincifyhowksg43 t1_je4376q wrote

lets complicate something that works perfectly fine right now and charge premium for useless stuff

36

ryangaston88 t1_je4464m wrote

I’m convinced the problem some people have with Face ID is caused by the way they set it up.

When I set my Face ID up I held the phone down low where I would naturally hold it while using it.

I’ve seen people hold the phone directly out in front of them while setting up their Face ID and it causes the shape of their face to look different.

16

Aerin25 t1_je45pol wrote

Very fancy but extra, but fancy. But. Extra.

6

settexi t1_je45sde wrote

I seen this same guy leak some of the dynamic island features last year

33

Captain_Alaska t1_je46zpt wrote

The biggest issue is people don’t know how to train it and actively work against its learning abilities. If you try to unlock and FaceID fails, DO NOT relock the phone and try it again in a more ideal position.

When FaceID has enough info that it thinks it’s you but not enough to authenticate you properly, if you authenticate with the passcode immediately after it fails it will add that data to the algorithm so it’s more likely to identify you in the future.

> Face ID will also update this data when it detects a close match but a passcode is subsequently entered to unlock the device.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208108

You can even rapidly train for certain angles or whatever by doing a FaceID unlock -> fail -> unlock with passcode -> lock and repeat until it recognises you.

I pretty much never have FaceID fail to authenticate unless the sensor is covered by something.

26

[deleted] t1_je4ahjl wrote

Except it doesn't matter and if you believe Apple is not spying on you as much as anybody else you are just naive.

Edit: there are four antitrust lawsuits in relation to privacy against them. One of those lawsuits is exactly related to the fact they kept tracking you, despite whether you've opted out. I wouldn't exactly call them the bastion of privacy.

Edit 2: their advertising revenue basically tripled from 2020 to 2021. And you certainly don't do that by not tracking people. They want you to think they give a shit about privacy. They do not. They care about money, and currently the money is in advertising. How do you see Google taking the major cut in the advertising pie without Apple's participation? If you still don't believe me they track you as much as Google - simply read their terms and conditions. Quite the read.

−12

indyjones85 t1_je4f3ew wrote

The sad state of buttons disappearing everywhere. What a terrible trend!

101

SomeoneBritish t1_je4gje5 wrote

I wonder if they want to change to this solution to add some cool new functionality. Maybe you can swipe your thumb on the volume ‘rocker’ to scroll or something else.

1

Papafynn t1_je4gryg wrote

Damn! What a solution looking for problem looks like.

38

Airules t1_je4gvs3 wrote

This all makes a lot of sense. Reading the post it is just replacing the low power mode on the existing processor with a separate even lower draw one to handle the emergency functions like “find my” and Apple Pay with a dedicated chip. Makes sense.

Considering how apple handled the solid state home button and track pads I have faith solid state volume buttons will be fine. Less movement introduces fewer points of failure too. In theory.

56

KYLETHORPAYNE1611 t1_je4gzsb wrote

Will there be any difference between the pro and pro max? Don’t want to get the big one haha

0

Korre88 t1_je4i7t3 wrote

Awesome. So when this chip breaks you can't use your phone and buttons anymore. Not user replaceable and probably need special Apple software and machines to "calibrate" it.

−5

Business-Parsnip-939 t1_je4isab wrote

You’re right and people refuse to believe it. Of course Apple is going to try and make more money by tracking you for ads, what are you going to do? Move to windows? Switch to a Pixel tablet? Apple products are the best quality there is, they can track you and push ads and it’ll still be so much better than the competition

3

Wood-In-Walls t1_je4jb9g wrote

As I understand it a price increase is expected with the "Pro"/"Ultra" models? So they'd want stuff like this to make the phone feel more exclusive/premium I guess.

Fine by me, what I'm more interested in is whether the standard iPhone 15 will finally be a decent phone again. The non-Pro iPhone 14 feels so gimped with its 60 Hz screen, non-autofocus ultrawide lens (for "macro photos") etc. Let's hope we get a good phone at that lower (but not low, especially in Europe) price point.

My hope is that features like the one mentioned here will set the Pro version apart as opposed to purposefully gimping the standard model.

0

[deleted] t1_je4jx73 wrote

> Of course Apple is going to try and make more money by tracking you for ads, what are you going to do?

The only thing I can do. Try and show people, that Apple isn't somehow their friend or that they care about privacy.

> Apple products are the best quality there is, they can track you and push ads and it’ll still be so much better than the competition

I mean, that's very subjective and if you like them that's great. For me they aren't really the best at anything, except mayyyybeeee tablets, so obviously I've gone with the competition, but it is important to keep companies accountable for their actions and not blindly believe their marketing. Regardless of which company we are talking about.

−2

[deleted] t1_je4loq7 wrote

> Yeah don’t know why you’re being downvoted.

I can understand it. For a long time people have believed Apple cares about their privacy, at least based on their marketing material, and suddenly hearing that's not actually true... Is kinda shitty.

I too would've been pissed if I bought something based on the promise of privacy and later on to realize that's actually a lie.

0

jeepster2982 t1_je4mw1y wrote

How are capacitive buttons going to work with cases? Just a bunch of holes? Hate it. Fixing a problem that doesn’t exist.

48

garywoo t1_je4noh6 wrote

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but don't all iPhone's currently have "always-on micro-processors" to detect things like power button presses, lightning port connections, and find my iPhone?

3

ioncloud9 t1_je4qalm wrote

I'll probably skip this generation. Maybe wait until the 16 or 17. I like my 13 Pro and there is no reason to upgrade.

26

opp0rtunist t1_je4r205 wrote

Unnecessary complication and a solution in search of a problem.

10

xerexyz t1_je4rtwn wrote

You are right, knowing Apple it will be a port that is usb compatible, but faster if you use an Apple cord that doesn’t come with the phone. Maybe it will be magnetic and use it’s own microprocessor. Who knows…. But it won’t just be a simple usb.

1

nikkithegr8 t1_je4s9vg wrote

persistence even when powered off. and we thought hackers are bad guys.

−1

Business-Parsnip-939 t1_je4sp49 wrote

It is always good to be aware and make others aware of how companies progress, but my point is that even if apple did push their advertisments further into inconvenient areas, (which they haven’t yet) most people would still buy Apple products because of their simplicity and quality.

A good example of this is the haptic trackpad, which if you want on windows laptops you have to pay thousands, and in terms of battery life on macs they are unbeatable. Even if Apple pushed iCloud and other services more and more, I wouldn’t really have a choice as Apple products are still some of the most quality products and you just can’t compare any windows laptop to the MacBook air for example

1

Substantial_Boiler t1_je4uftz wrote

Data exchange in network traffic is usually encrypted. If they really tried, it could also be obfuscated in other ways, so there's no real way to know if they're really spying or not.

You can only fully trust it if the OS and its relevant application components are open source. so that you exactly know what it does.

−10

NexiNext t1_je4vatq wrote

Only if they would bring 3D Touch back. Not this crap

3

GlitchParrot t1_je4wmdt wrote

Correction: You can only fully trust it if the entire stack from hardware, drivers, firmware, kernel, OS and applications running on the OS are open source, you have assembled all of them yourself, and read through the entire source code.

7

XSavageWalrusX t1_je4xje2 wrote

It seems like a lot of you people lose a ton of time trying to prevent companies from seeing you go to pornhub. I’m all for easy steps like turning off tracking settings and using a VPN, but the security obsession some people have really misses the ball on what actually matters.

−7

XSavageWalrusX t1_je4y79o wrote

This doesn’t make any sense. The chip breaking is much less likely than a physical button breaking (which 90% of people take to apple anyways). It’s the same chance that your actual phone chip stops working.

9

afieldonearth t1_je4zlw5 wrote

That would be great actually. I know people love the physical ringer mute button, but thinking about it, I switched mine to off when I got my first iPhone in 2017, and have not once wanted it to be on since. I would be 100% fine with this being a software toggle and having a more useful physical button that can be mapped to other things.

55

johnzy87 t1_je51hcu wrote

“We have no choice” was their response to the EU mandating usb c. This does not mean they have to do it this year as it is mandatory in 2024 which means the iphone 15 could still have no usb c. Although I don’t think they will take that route. Knowing apple they might just not give a port at all and go full wireless 😆.

0

yigo1337 t1_je545n0 wrote

yes, its called piezoelectricity and has been a thing for decades. wow apple, such innovation.

−4

chukijay t1_je54i82 wrote

It’ll make cases more expensive as they’ll have to redesign buttons/functionality. Likely we will see nice cases that are very expensive, and the usual cases just feature cutouts. Then there will be some that just forego the whole thing and you’ll have to change volume via software

12

chukijay t1_je54ojp wrote

I was excited to finally move everything to USB-C this year but the more I read about this phone the more I want to wait a year and see what the next one looks like. Also to give this one some time to prove itself.

4

XSavageWalrusX t1_je563ko wrote

Idk the MacBook trackpad haptic feedback is pretty fricken good at simulating clicks. I think that typing is an area you want feedback, but most things that you are looking at when you do them do not need tactile feedback, and to the extent they do haptics work fine.

8

wiyixu t1_je5kh2k wrote

I wasn’t super thrilled, but willing to see it in practice before saying no, however if today’s rumor that a new haptic engine in place of the SIM tray means a return to 3D Touch I am all in. Haptics could credibly replace the tactile feedback of the current hardware mute switch.

Once you flush the physical buttons and make the frame responsive to touch you open up a whole world of new interaction models. Side frame to scroll. Side frame double tap to enable “reach ability” (the triple back tap is meh). Slide to confirm purchases with Apple. Squeeze the phone to take a photo (I know Android has had squeeze for a while)

2

schmidtyb43 t1_je5n7bv wrote

Yeah I’m in the same boat. I use the mute switch one time when I get my phone and then never again. I could think of plenty of other things it would be great for instead. Even better if we can map it to a shortcut… but that might be too wishful of thinking

10

afieldonearth t1_je5s5in wrote

It’s not about whether you talk on the phone, it’s about whether you like loud phone ringer / notification noises. I hate the constant chirps and beeps of someone’s unsilenced phone, including my own, even when I’m alone.

Vibrate works great, or better yet, my Apple Watch lets me know immediately when my phone is ringing. No audible noises required.

18

sibman t1_je5ucly wrote

I can see the conspiracy theories now.

1

f0gax t1_je5uof2 wrote

So a micro microprocessor?

1

fobbybobby323 t1_je5wm26 wrote

Hmmm I hate capacitive buttons at least the way it’s been implemented so far. Doesn’t even seem like much of an innovation. Question is benefit of usb c vs negative of capacitive button worth it? Or wait until they sort things out (or get rid of it) aka MacBook Pro Touch Bar.

1

gnulynnux t1_je651fd wrote

The problem is I never had to worry or think about "training" my TouchID, and I never had to worry about my thumb having different glasses, different hairstyles, different masks, etc.

It's very very very far from "just works" when we have to consider and micromanage Apple's implementation details.

−3

3435qalvin t1_je698b4 wrote

It’s a feature desperately missing on iPhones. I’m always mad when I just can’t bring up the camera by clicking the power button twice like on any android I’ve had my hand in yet.

7

mjcc-p t1_je6akpm wrote

so normal 15 will keep current buttons and switch?

1

amritajaatak t1_je6o4cp wrote

What happens when you forget your charger on a 2 week trip and come back to a flat battery and the microprocessor aint microprocessing?

1

Explosivpotato t1_je6ok2d wrote

Counterpoint: my elderly mother cannot use Touch ID. The wrinkling and loose skin on her hands means that Touch ID simply cannot last more than a few hours for her. She’ll train it, then it’ll work once or twice and never again. This persisted for several devices in a row.

With Face ID, she has no issues. Trained once, and it just works. She has to use her passcode about once a week now.

1

gnulynnux t1_je6pfda wrote

Oh yeah! I don't discredit that. For a lot of people, face recognition works better than fingerprint recognition, and vice versa.

With people saying things like "Your face seems to be the problem here" or "people don’t know how to train it and actively work against its learning abilities", I feel like I need to add my two cents. Fingerprint recognition works far far better for me

1

Explosivpotato t1_je6pxul wrote

I honestly like when apple maintains both designs. Would you like a fingerprint scanner or a face scanner? Choose your form factor. The only possible improvement would be to offer both in one package, but they’d have to adopt <10 year old concepts to do that. I’m not fussy, you’re fussy

1

gnulynnux t1_je6vb9x wrote

It is not getting better over time for me. I'll have entire days where Apple's face recognition does not work once. It's even worse when you have a long passcode.

Why are there so many people here who can not believe that FaceID does not work for some people?

0

Daftworks t1_je782by wrote

Sounds awful from a usability standpoint. What if you're using your phone with gloves? What if you use your phone with a case? What if you drop your phone on the side with all the capacitive buttons?

2

dnhs47 t1_je7dfxy wrote

That’s horrible! An always-on security vulnerability. You can’t even pull the battery to make it really-truly off.

A hacker’s wet dream.

And by hacker, I include our government. They’ll love being able to eavesdrop using our “powered-off” phones, 24/7/365.

−1

wiyixu t1_je7g0fi wrote

It’s an accelerator like contextual menus or keyboard shortcuts. They don’t replace primary interaction they augment it.

> What if you’re using your phone with gloves?

Same thing that happens now when using the phone with gloves. Nothing unless they have a conductive material in the fabric

> What if you use your phone with a case?

Apple has to solve that problem anyway for the buttons. Cutouts that expose the frame? A case material that allows for pass-through conductivity.

> What if you drop your phone on the side with all the capacitive buttons?

Capacitive touch requires some some material that conducts electricity to close the loop. Unless your phone dropped on a conductive material like water nothing would happen.

1

ThisisthewayLA t1_je7jfhk wrote

Why the hell would consumers want that? It sounds like more problems not a feature

1

OrbJungle t1_je7r525 wrote

This new technology rumored for the upcoming iPhone models sounds like it could bring a lot of added convenience and functionality to users. I'm intrigued to see how Apple will implement it and what other surprises they might have in store

2

atcriidp t1_je81pp6 wrote

They really think we’re gonna love it.

1

ih_786 t1_je8kqq1 wrote

Nah man wtf i use the mute switch everyday!!!

1

Airules t1_je8qxc3 wrote

Silly. Of course they will be compatible. Have you seen how many third party cases have MagSafe? That’s a bit more of a engineering challenge than a capacitive button. There is absolutely no way there won’t be hundreds of third party options available day one which work with the buttons no problem whatsoever.

1

abhiram214 t1_je8y7se wrote

Would be good enough if they use haptic feedback to indicate button presses.

1

FarVehicle5333 t1_je9b1ix wrote

Well we are already at the stage where we drop capacitive buttons. When will Apple drop charging port completely and speakers ? We need a fully glass enclosed iphone.

1

Sylvurphlame t1_jeac8e5 wrote

Assuming these rumors are true, than the regular 15 will likely keep regular buttons at least the first years, similar to the rumor that all 15’s will use Dynamic Island this year.

1

Sylvurphlame t1_jeadge0 wrote

Or if they only put periscope zoom in the pro max. But it’s still too early to put much weight into rumors, in my opinion. We’ll see what they do when they do it. Or when iOS 17 betas start getting torn down for references, lol

1

Sylvurphlame t1_jeadq0e wrote

They had to redesign cases anyway for the last several years due to model changes. What made you think this year would magically be different?

> get one with ugly cutouts

Or they just make them with conductive elements in the case buttons

1

Sylvurphlame t1_jeadv5x wrote

The case doesn’t need haptics…

Capacitive is the method of registering input. Haptic is the method of feedback to the user. The case should conduct the vibration just fine unless it’s especially loose or padded for some reason.

1

Sylvurphlame t1_jebqxo6 wrote

Already responded to your other comment first. But no that wouldn’t be difficult. Think about the screen.

If you long touch the top of the screen, there’s no Taptic Engine there. But you still feel it. The entire body of the iPhone conducts the vibration no matter where you actually touch.

The button itself needs to be capacitive to interact with the capacitive buttons. It could also just be straight up metallic with some sort of non-scratch bottom or just a thin enough plastic coating so as not to insulate the button. But the button would happily conduct the vibration of a second Taptic Engine is used as long as it’s in contact during the feedback tap. But I’m not convinced that’s actually necessary as one engine covers the entire phone for screen presses anywhere as-is.

They could certainly fit another engine in if they want to increase the strength of the haptic feedback or add more complexity, but it wouldn’t be strictly necessary. I’m more of the opinion that every cubic millimeter possible should be devoted to battery gains.

1

kermityfrog t1_jec16yi wrote

Yes.

Conductive - transfer the signal from your finger without a physical button.

Haptic - vibration feedback from the haptic/taptic engine, so that you can feel that something has happened, similar to the clicking of a physical button.

If there is a button cover on the case, it may be easy to make it conductive to transfer the signal, but how can they also transfer the haptic vibration to your finger? Maybe it's possible, but it feels like added complexity for very few positive reasons.

1

Sylvurphlame t1_jec28ob wrote

> how can they also transfer the haptic vibration to your finger?

Per the other reply, it doesn’t have to go directly to the finger. The entire iPhone conducts the vibration from wherever Taptic Engine(s) lives. The same way you can feel the haptics when you touch the top of the screen even though the engine is at the bottom of the iPhone.

1