Los Angeles police accidentally release photos of undercover officers to watchdog website
latimes.comSubmitted by BearJew1991 t3_11xsmsd in news
Submitted by BearJew1991 t3_11xsmsd in news
[removed]
No addresses were published.
" ... 9,300 city police officers’ photos, complete with their names, ethnicity, rank, date of hire, division/bureau and badge numbers."
The joke was that the cops are going to beat their wives out of anger, not that someone else is going to hurt them
Ah the joys of reddit, where real life horrors get turned into jokes to net upvotes.
Yeah I know 40% is a lot of partners getting beat
That’s the self-reported number; the actual figure is likely significantly higher.
[removed]
Yeah I feel you missed my point.
Oh, they understood, there's just a lot of people on reddit who don't actually care about police brutality and all the other issues surrounding police.
Not beyond it getting them upvotes no sadly.
You mean at all right? I suggest you take s quick pit stop to r/protectandserve to see part of why people on reddit beat point in like how they beat their wives.
Because maybe one day it'll stick to actually hold them fucking accountable for their shit.
Yeah I wouldn't hold your breath, shockingly jokes on social media don't usually do much to actually make meaningful change.
That usually requires actual effort.
Well as much effort as you've put in to complaining about people joking, I'm sure you've also done actual work to help with the problem as well? Link me the site you've built to raise awareness? Or show us the evidence of donations to the cause? I mean there has to be more to helping than just shit talking people who make jokes.
You want me to give you access to my personal details and private finances online?
Yeah as fishing scams go this isn't a particularly good one.
Nah, I want you to show us something that indicates you're out here doing the good work. I'm sure you've done something worthy that wouldn't require your personal assets to be shared.
Well how exactly am I supposed to prove I've done it, without sharing my personal information?
Do you think I use the same username for Reddit for everything I do online?
None of it matters because clearly you've missed the point. The point is, I have absolutely no clue what you do or don't do to support any given cause. The most I could do is search your reddit comments if I cared enough. Just as you have no clue what anyone here has done outside of their comments. Yet here you are calling everyone out for not doing enough to raise awareness. Just because all you see are the jokes, that doesn't mean they aren't doing more.
I mean your right I don't know what these people do. For all I know they could be dedicated social activists. If they are good for them.
My overall point though wasn't that they weren't doing enough to deal with the issue, more that I felt the jokes were in bad taste and didn't buy the justification that they were "raising awareness."
When its a joke guaranteed to appear on any thread that even mentions the police at least six times, then its safe to say people are already aware.
This is just blatant upvote farming.
Ok, I would definitely agree with that. I highly doubt any of these jokes are being made with the explicit goal of raising awareness. I would argue that unless you have a large dedicated audience, you're never actually joking to raise awareness. My apologies, I misunderstood what you were going for.
Thanks, honestly its my fault I wasn't clear enough what I was complaining about.
Nah, I think it's more mine. It's early and I'm at work so when I read comments, sometimes I see the words but not the intent because I'm just skimming.
Well we've all been there mate. Still its hard to gage intent sometimes with just text.
I hope you have a quick and easy day.
[removed]
[removed]
Hey if your cop husband or wife is beating you, this is call for you to get help.
Well I sure hope the jokes carry on being calls to help to all those poor people being abused.
If not, well what more can they expect than nothing?
Statistically abuse victims don’t reach out to law enforcement BECAUSE of their reputation. Lucky you haven’t had experience with this.
Yeah I know.
So I'm going to assume your going to tell me how you feel making jokes about the issue is going to help anything?
It wasn’t a joke?
So you seriously think I might feel the entire matter is a little tasteless cause I'm married to a cop who's beating me?
It’s not up to me to perceive you.
And for that I'm truly thankful.
Friends of family are more likely to provide some sort of protection, even if only temporary.
Comedy doesn't discriminate. Gilbert Gottfried did a 9/11 joke two weeks later.
Yeah, some jokes are dark and it's a way for some to cope with horrible things in life. Only by making it something we can laugh about does it become something not so overwhelmingly bad that you can process a bit of it little by little. Can't do something about something you're too afraid to deal with.
Well I suppose that's fair enough. I understand the value of dark humour.
I don't know I guess its just when you keep saying the same jokes over and over again, you start to feel its more your mocking the people suffering rather than anything else. A few responses I've got certainly haven't helped with that perception.
More like using humor to shine a light on all the atrocities we suffer.
If you say so. I mean I can understand that argument, but when its gotten to the point that literally everyone does it multiple times, it becomes a bit hard to believe their is any light left to shine.
Until people in power are willing to listen, humor is all we have.
I mean isn't their still voting, vandalism, harassment, protesting, striking, civil disobedience, rioting and random mayhem rebellion?
I kind of feel all of them are a bit more effective than humour.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Hmm seems like an issue that could have been avoided by allowing people with higher IQs to apply. -sips tea
But then they won’t be brainless violent automatons of the state and if they aren’t that then what are they
Something tells me you'll just find guys who are smarter about beating their wives. It takes a certain controlling personality to even want to be a cop in the first place.
I used to wanna be a cop for years.
My reasoning was "drive around in a decent car you don't have to pay for, maybe write a ticket for someone going too fast, and do some paperwork all day"
It's more like the nature of being a cop brings out those shitty elements of yourself.
[removed]
That's a lot of undercover cops.
There's no way it's a way to get rid of some of the enemies of the LA cop gang. Oh, there's NO WAY they would do something like that... I'm sure it was all a total accident.
This is a terrible take. Police incompetence/laziness is an enormous problem, and accounts for most of the biggest problems we see with police organizations. Like, Police malice is a really big problem. But it pales in comparison to the incompetence and apathy many organizations exhibit. If you're a True Crime fan, you know how bad and rampant the incompetence can get.
I post this a lot but there’s a billboard in my town the cops put up that has a thin blue line and it says STOP THE WAR
As in stop the war against cops? You know, the armed branch of the state? Which makes all of the rest of us non leos (you know, the ones who don’t get paid vacation time for murdering people or shooting poodles) aggro enemy combatants I guess?
The billboard underneath that one is still available for rent and I’m still taking suggestions on what we should put there. It infuriates me every time I see it. My point is that cops absolutely hate non cops and that makes up the biggest part of their problem. 95% malice, 5% incompetence
WE SURRENDERED ALREADY, STOP HURTING US springs to mind
It’s a group of puppies with the caption we surrender.
Have an arrow pointing up and a caption interpreting it.
STOP THE WAR
"In other words: STOP trying to hold us ACCOUNTABLE for our actions."
Then, have a bunch of photos of innocent people wrecklessly killed by police.
OP, if you do this, make sure a lawyer creates insulation between you and the billboard contract. If they paid for that billboard, they're going to work to discover who paid for its criticism.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
I mean that's a terrible billboard and suggests your local police aren't particularly good.
But its kind of a reach to take that as evidence that all the cops throughout the country hate everyone who isn't a cop don't you think?
Still even if your right, how is that applicable in this scenerio? Everyone involved was also a cop.
You haven’t been paying attention
You got a little boot polish on your chin there.
Right cause everyone who ever questions the logically fallacies must be part of the enemy.
If you must know I personally think the American police force is both institutionally and personally corrupt, racist, overpaid, overmilitarized and an embodiment of all the countries failures (or if your more cynical, a reflection).
I just don't think them putting up a billboard is the best argument you could make to prove it or that it has much to do with this story.
Yes incompetence is a huge issue, but there have also been a lot of stories recently about the problems with la cop gangs. An intential leak to intimidate people into not talking is a very real possibility.
[removed]
There is a big issue with cop gangs in LA right now and the current head of the LAPD has actually made a force to combat these gangs. I would say the commenter is speculating, but he is right in that there is a issue with gangs in police
What you’re saying is definitely true. What he is saying has some merit too.
they're literally only around to beat up minorities, the other shit is just side work
[deleted]
no one, and I mean no one gives a shit.
[removed]
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
We're talking about police, so why not both?
One can be fixed. The other needs to be… resolved.
Malicious people love how popular this dumb idiom has gotten.
Probably, yeah, because malicious people aren't that common. Most people fuck-up out of laziness or genuine incompetence; most people are not trying to deliberately hurt other people. They hurt people with massive incompetence and apathy.
I think police departments do attract more than their fair share of actually malicious people.
The ones that aren't actively malicious dont make it through academy
They don't stay that way. That is one of the sadest things about policing in this country is even people who go into with good intentions get corrupted by the system, and they either leave or convert.
Or get murdered by their fellow officers...
[removed]
There is no way that it is more likely that this waa intentional and not a crazy mistake. Leak the information in a less public way and have the cops either moved, fired, or killed, and then it probably wouldn't even make the news.
Tell me you don’t understand Hanlon’s razor without telling me you don’t understand it.
Who’s razor???
Problem is, once it becomes a pattern, stupidity is no longer an adequate explanation.
Because stupid can’t form patterns?
Animals can form patterns that harm others it doesn’t mean they did it out of malice.
Bad or stupid habits are easily formed.
And you’re assuming that malice can’t pretend to be stupidity.
If there’s pattern of “stupidity” that just so happens to benefit the “stupid”, it’s very safe to assume malice.
That is literally the opposite of hanlons razor.
It is like you willfully ignore that and need to believe mustache twirling evil is why people do dumb stuff.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
A pattern of apparent stupidity that benefits the “stupid” is not adequately explained by mere stupidity.
The fact it benefits the “stupid”, and the “stupid” keeps doing it, despite the harm it’s going to others (because malice wouldn’t even be a question if there were no harm happening) is all the evidence you need to assume malice.
Even if they are truly ignorant of the harm that’s happening, willful ignorance is malice.
Additionally lying and claiming stupidity is a common defense for the malicious who get caught. The intelligently malicious will make sure that their actions can appear to be explained by stupidity.
No, the variables of “The stupidity is a pattern” and “The stupidity benefits the one being stupid” change the equation enough that you’re the stupid one if you think that “they don’t know that they’re doing, they’re just dumb” is sufficient explanation.
stupdily malicious?
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
A pattern of “stupidity” that benefits the “stupid” can be assumed to be malice, though.
They would've been much more surreptitious than "accidentally" releasing a list in this manner.
Pretty good take.
All 9,300 of them? If they have that many enemies how are they still alive.
Finally, police stupidity that won't cost us money.
On second thought, those cops are going to sue.
There might be a lot of deaths soon because of it. Anyone undercover might be blown, and all it takes it one seedy guy to remember a face. Also, their family could be targeted as well.
Cases blown, for sure, but I don't think any criminal competent enough to warrant an undercover assignment would think they could get away with murdering a POLICE OFFICER
Narcos don’t give a fook
Maybe not in Mexico. In the United States? Killing cops is bad for business.
I mean maybe but if it’s an UC confirmed with a wire on, I don’t think that business thoughts would cross their minds
[removed]
I hope not. But their is always the danger that some criminals are just stupid, aggressive or desperate and you only need one of them in each organisation.
[removed]
Heck, if any gang member happens to look like one of the cops, there in a pretty dodgy situation.
[removed]
Calm down there Hollywood. No one’s going to kill a cop unless they have a death wish
Eh don't be so sure. There are always those who are either hot headed, stupid, desperate or arrogant enough to not think ahead about it.
Damn that makes a lot of sense since no cop has ever been killed ever.
1 cop? Sure. A ton of undercover cops all at once? Much different story.
[removed]
Now match those photos against the photos of violent instigators during BLM protests.
[removed]
Good grief someone needs to be fired.
Nah. Probably just some poor plebe who was told to fill the request by a higher-up who was supposed to vet the request.
Either way it couldn't have happened to a better org. :)
I've never worked for a police department but I have worked in various government agencies. Foia/public records work is absolutely soul crushing work. It's regularly used as a dumping ground for people agencies can't fire but want to get rid of, and promising managers (if you can make it here, you can make it anywhere). You have to herd cats to get every office and division that touched something to propose redactions based on their specialized knowledge, and the person ostensibly leading the collection is probably like a 60 year old man who sleeps at his desk half the day and spends the other half posting political Facebook memes, but he's buddies with various muckity muck senior career managers or union stewards so he's untouchable.
When it's all said and done, and records are sent out the day before the judge is getting ready to sanction everyone involved, you get a call from angry officials upset that no one redacted such and such thing that was super sensitive. But those fuckers signed off on it as being fully redacted.
Its a problem of attitude, unpleasant conditions (at the federal level, the time lines are from the pre-digital era), and borderline abuse by politically aligned groups that shift based on the administration, to fish for any sort of juicy dirt and otherwise just Gum up agency resources.
I would quit before having to deal with the process again. I'm all for accountability but the sausage of it is terribly unpleasant to grind and pack.
[removed]
You don't have your police consequence scale calibrated correctly. They usually get paid vacation for outright murder caught on camera, so by my calculations, this is a Caribbean cruise while getting blown by supermodels.
[removed]
I mean I get the desire for transparency, but surely they realise why publishing information about undercover officers could go horribly wrong right?
Either way it looks like they've effectively crippled the LAPD's entire uncover branch. I wonder what repercussions that will have.
HAHAHA
Knew you were undercover. Its just table salt, fool.
Arrest me for seasoning in a baggie.
Jokes on you! All this time, I've been smoking harmless tobacco!
The watchdog website knew what they got. They aren’t publishing the info.
They may be suspicious of cops, but don’t try to get them killed.
In fact, if their job is questioning police intentions, they would be very suspicious why they got this info.
Ah that's good to hear.
And glad to hear their investigating this. At best its incompetence on a terminal level.
Got a non paywall link?
google the headline
[removed]
Turn off JavaScript for the site.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Eh, I wouldnt cheer this, criminal organizations have a tendency to target families of rats, so there's a lot of innocents in danger from this
they should quit the police department and get a real job then
They'd still need to go into witness protection, quitting the force doesn't take the target of them and their families
Secret police and secret courts get no sympathy from me.
Again, talking about spouses and children here
Oh.... you sweet summer child.
Like all kinds of bless your heart.
Oh yes, my favorite part of Internet discourse, not saying your point just saying your superior and everyone who thinks different doesn't deserve your time
Good. Maybe we can actually do something useful with the undercover dept funds
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Why reddit links sites with pay walls I will never understand
[removed]
[removed]
Maybe if they stopped playing police gangs, and worried about doing their jobs, shit like this wouldn't happen.
Undercover cops are openly bastards
[removed]
Were are the names from Jeffery Epsteins black book?
You can look it up here: https://epsteinsblackbook.com/
Trouble is it turned out the "black book" was just a media story that they blew up for ratings, and its really just a mundane address book that even has the phone numbers of his family, cleaners and contractors he hired for his events and restaurants he liked to eat at.
In other words, utterly worthless.
Sure bro
Just to clarify do you disagree with me, or do you think their is another black book their keeping secret.
If its the former why? If its the later, ask yourself why exactly would such a thing even exist in the first place? What possibly benefit to Epstein could it have possibly given?
It's not a site for showing off the watchdogs, ya dummies.
I don’t know what type of vested interest the LAPD has in helping me watch dogs but i’m really excited to see some new dog videos on r/aww from their stash
pegothejerk t1_jd4lpl4 wrote
Man, that’s a lot of wives that are gonna have a bad time unless they get to a shelter or friends house with the kids.