18 million? So half the total of all those orders?

daamn, what was she doordashing? realstate?

So…basically she is responsible for the DD service fees.

Meanwhile the people responsible for the opioid crisis killed hundreds of thousands of people and didn't even have to admit wrongdoing, they just paid a fine. This country is fuuuuuucked up.

so wait a minute stolen credit card for takeout results in a bigger bond requirement than people who tried to overthrow the government?

Fucking Louisiana, Texas' stupid next door neighbor.

I'm so fucking glad I moved out of the South. Fucking morons, all of them.

She only ordered from Frog Ross’s Foie Grasturant.

DO NOT COMMIT FINANCIAL CRIMES IF YOU ARE POOR.

If rich: See other rules on the reverse side of the page.

All the while January 6th terrorists get less.

The aunt probably felt very betrayed and violated.

Her crimes go beyond just felony theft. Because of the age of the aunt they will include exploitation of the elderly or infirmed. And it's highly likely it wasn't her first offense

Different jurisdictions. Louisiana must take crime far more seriously than DC or the federal government. But her crime is more than just felony theft. Charges will include financial exploitation of the elderly or infirmed because of the age of the aunt. And I'm just guessing but this probably isn't her first offense.

So 12k worth of fraudulent charges equals a $18 million bond? Makes sense

/s

I've never heard of anyone getting bond that high. Maybe like 2-5m for murder, bur past that they just deny bond right?

Must be an automatic amount for each charge or denying bond completely isn't allowed.

ChatGPT is still in beta bros

Seems excessive considering her theft was for 12k, done at an average of 89 bucks a pop. If she's stealing less than 100 dollars at a time I'm guessing a 100 dollar bail would have been just as effective as 18 million.

JudgeGPT

San Bernardino man convicted of violent armed assaults released pending sentencing, murders police officer. We should have charged him for stealing lunch, he would have stayed in jail.

> Travis also said that while $18 million is a lofty number, it is not the official bond set by a judge. Prior to a bond hearing, crimes have preset bond figures and the preset bond for each one of her counts is $25,000. The $18 million number is a cumulative total amount based on the preset figure set for the over 800 counts she faces.

The number is insane, but it would be completely different if a judge had given this instead. Most likely it will be heavily reduced.

Bunch of fuckers in here didn't even read the article. It literally says the following:

>Travis also said that while $18 million is a lofty number, it is not the official bond set by a judge. Prior to a bond hearing, crimes have preset bond figures and the preset bond for each one of her counts is $25,000. The $18 million number is a cumulative total amount based on the preset figure set for the over 800 counts she faces.

Once she has an actual bond hearing, it'll probably be a few thousand

Plus, the "fine" they paid was only a small percentage of their profits.

I emember a quote about "if the punishment for a crime is a fine, then it is only a punishment for the poor"

Guess what happens if you're suspected of selling **gasp** cigarettes on the street.

It’s not excessive.

She was charged with almost 800 counts. Each count has an arbitrary bond of $25k. If you add up the total amount of bond for each count you end up with $18 million.

When she has an actual bond hearing the judge will probably overturn the arbitrary bond number and award something more reasonable.

This is an arbitrary number set by statute for bond, which a judge could overturn when she has an actual bond hearing.

When she gets a bond hearing it’s probably not gonna be 18 million.

And why not just throw in some cyber crimes cause she used her phone too.

If it isn’t reduced to something way way way lower this should be reposted at top of not the onion, and late stage capitalism, and probably a few others. Ridiculous.

Per-offence bonding is a human rights violation, as in a modern justice system the bond is related to the characteristics of the offender not the offence. Pro tip: mandatory minimum sentences are also internationally condemned as a violation of human rights. The US is a major offender against human rights every single day.

Maybe the DA has or will. She's certainly not a good person

Eh I reserve judgement until the 137th offense. Though to be entirely fair, it's excessive bail due to the fact that there's 136 individual counts stacked on top of each other. A judge should probably schedule that bail hearing soon to avoid a civil suit. Good person or not they deserve civil rights.

Yes, I agree it's excessive.

Other side of the page: we will fine you 40% if we catch you, you keep the other 60%, or 100% if we don't catch you.

Wacky tobacky or cancer sticks?

I say you, you daid.

Mug shot looks like they told her what her bond was gonna be right before they snapped the picture.

Well the seditionists were white, so.

Summary execution mate. Also for allegedly passing a bad 20.

So, the aunt that she victimized is rich ?

Just single cigarettes. Packs of twenty are OK.

Internationally condemned? Funny, the US legal system isn’t bound by international opinion.

How are pharmaceutical companies responsible for the opioid crisis? Do they forcibly make people ingest opioids? The people who abuse opioids are responsible for the opioid crisis. It just easier to blame some faceless big evil corporation.

I had back surgery and nerve damage that caused excruciating pain recently and was prescribed opioids and I am not addicted in the slightest.

[deleted]