Submitted by Victorzaroni t3_11my9n7 in philadelphia
This question might seem ridiculous. Conceptually, a convention center brings big crowds into a city that otherwise wouldn't have come and gets them into the surrounding area too spend their money. Win for the neighborhood. I totally get that point of view.
Except... The Philly Convention Center is so f'ing massive and looks empty 90% of the time. I usually walk down 13th under the convention center to get to Arch. I almost never see anyone inside that section, hell I almost never see something going on in the center in general. Last 2 things I remember are the car show and that PAX board game thing. They clearly have stuff going on if you look at their events page, but it definitely doesn't feel that way.
And honestly it doesn't seem to me that even when these big crowds come in that they're willing to explore the city. Instead, they opt to stick to the immediate surrounding area which is made up of big corporate establishments like Panera or Dunkin, because those corporations are the only ones that can afford that prime real estate. I acknowledge that Reading Terminal is a thing and that definitely gets convention center business, but that place is swamped 24/7 anyway.
My personal experience then (as one guy, I know) really makes me question what could have been if the convention center never existed. Would there be more local businesses, restaurants, housing, etc? The center has 1 million square feet of space. I just can't imagine a convention center was the best use of that space.
I am a newish resident, so I have no clue what it was like pre-convention center. Maybe at the time the center made perfect sense. But without historical knowledge, outside looking in type perspective, it doesn't make sense to me now. This subreddit seems to be pro-convention center. So... why? Is there factual data that describes the economy of Center City before and after the center? Is there evidence to show that it was a good idea?
[deleted] t1_jbkaoxk wrote
[removed]