Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

go_berds t1_ixia83v wrote

Another person who should’ve been in jail. Hopefully they finally put this shithead away for a long time

261

RustedRelics t1_ixj8coy wrote

Now now. It’s not his fault. Let’s not malign our finest citizens. 🙄

11

[deleted] t1_ixk28wy wrote

[deleted]

−6

PennName47 t1_ixm69wc wrote

I mean, society likely DID fail him. “Society” being a very broad term for his immediate family plus the authority figures (or lack thereof) in his life. But that also doesn’t change that he’s breaking the law and needs to be duly detained for it. These things aren’t mutually exclusive.

7

gwhh t1_ixlpe54 wrote

He already out on low bail I bet.

8

[deleted] t1_ixjr5fu wrote

several counts of armed robbery, forced entry, grand theft auto, possibly attempted murder, aggravated assault. krasner;s inept and a softy, but even he can't let this guy go

4

[deleted] t1_ixjkueo wrote

[removed]

−3

courageous_liquid t1_ixjm1cv wrote

what the fuck

5

Bartleby_TheScrivene t1_ixjm6rb wrote

I lost all empathy for criminals somewhere along the way. I don't think they can be "saved," no matter how much money you throw at the criminal justice system.

8

clander270 t1_ixlyiyj wrote

Good thing you don't work in the criminal justice system then, huh?

1

LFKhael t1_ixjmemw wrote

Religion is a disease.

5

courageous_liquid t1_ixjmwq5 wrote

'love thy neighbor' apparently really means 'hack off their hands with an axe for minor infractions'

4

Bartleby_TheScrivene t1_ixlybrj wrote

"Minor infractions"

Did you read the article? It wasn't petty theft. He was breaking into homes, armed, and tying up the residents in their basement.

ON November 11, officers were called to a property on the 1300 block of North 15th Street after 11 residents were led to the basement and tied up by two armed suspects, police say. It is believed that the people inside, all between the ages of 20 and 22, were asleep with the armed suspects entered their residence, stole money, hones, credit and debit cards and a Lincoln MKZ that belonged to one of the residents. 

4

cerialthriller t1_ixjdm5n wrote

Nobody belongs in prison. He just needs to have a good sit down conversation with everyone favorite DA and he’ll see the error of his ways. Just like his gun violence prevention advocate, he hasn’t killed any more sex workers in atleast a year

−28

justanawkwardguy t1_ixiq0z1 wrote

For those reading the article: the 100 block of Logan and 4900 block of Royal intersect. This guy parked not one, but two stolen cars just outside his own home. He got caught because cops watched him get into one of the stolen cars with stolen property on his person

217

rovinchick t1_ixj4ka8 wrote

So cops actually do try to solve crimes? Everyone says they are on soft strike. 🤷

−66

DrJJStroganoff t1_ixj7jm0 wrote

They are. It took a whole 2 stolen cars and stolen property before they made an arrest.

92

rovinchick t1_ixjc19b wrote

"Surveillance teams captured Johnson getting into the stolen car with a key and a debit card and two Apple watches taken from on N 18th Street."

It takes time to perform surveillance and gather enough evidence to get to the arrest warrant.

33

DrJJStroganoff t1_ixjcet0 wrote

Silly me. I thought you could run the plate any time he drives a stolen car. That surveillance would have taken a whole 1 cop cruiser hanging around his house

0

rovinchick t1_ixjd8c7 wrote

Definitely not a cruiser, it has to be covert. There is also a team dedicated to it, because you have to make sure it's documented with more than one witness. They also likely had to stake out the location for several days to catch him exiting with the stolen property. If only crime solving was so simple.

28

DrJJStroganoff t1_ixjedq8 wrote

Indeed. Your super sleuthing skills are going to waste here on Reddit. Please join the ppd, maybe then they could find my stolen car, or my dad's, or who mugged and pistol whipped my sister, or who broke into my house and killed my dog.

−12

rovinchick t1_ixjgxmm wrote

Maybe you could consider joining, since you think you could do such a better job!

24

clander270 t1_ixlyxcu wrote

Ehh, don't egg him on too much, we don't need any more "I am vengeance" cops shooting people on a hunch then wondering why everyone hates them

−1

AutisticOcelot t1_ixj9db5 wrote

When your sarcastic comment actually proves the point you are trying to refute.

8

Franklinia_Alatamaha OP t1_ixi8k9p wrote

https://twitter.com/PhillyCrimeUpd/status/1595461657605836800

On probation. Had Aggravated Assault and Arson charges that had him enter a negotiated sentence of 3 months confinement and two years probation. Three guesses what DAO administration negotiated that deal. And he was already in violation of probation for absconding.

183

go_berds t1_ixiazzf wrote

How tf do you get probation for arson??

136

BasileusLeoIII t1_ixifory wrote

or for aggravated assault (which is assault with a deadly weapon)??

why the fuck are violent criminals so frequently not prosecuted or underprosecuted?

This is exactly what Krasner promised he wouldn't do when he pitched his progressive prosecution experiment, but we have how many dozens of easy examples of the Krasner Kids committing heinous crimes after he released them for their prior violent crimes?

170

dreexel_dragoon t1_ixjc29s wrote

It's because his office is too incompetent to prosecute even the layup violent crimes since Krasner fired all the senior ADAs

25

gyp_casino t1_ixk7hou wrote

Krasner seems particular bad about this, but it's always been this way to some degree. Even 10-15 years ago when you read a news article about a homicide, you could scroll down to the final paragraph and read that the suspect had 15 arrests on his record.

2

rovinchick t1_ixm12ik wrote

Agree it's been that way for a long time. At least under Lynne Abraham, I think there was some deterrent effect to commiting crimes under the "deadliest DA." Then Kenney went on to beat her in the Mayoral primaries and look where we are.

2

Sleepy_Like_Me t1_ixifgmw wrote

You can thank Let em out Larry

78

That_kek_John t1_ixipjyv wrote

I genuinely don’t understand Krasner’s policies. I understand believing in rehabilitative justice, but in order to do that don’t you have to rehabilitate the criminals? I don’t get what just letting someone out does

65

Sleepy_Like_Me t1_ixirioj wrote

Honestly I couldn’t tell you but I have had a deep hatred of him ever since that temple kid got killed last year. Fucking idiot let a violent, uncontrollable 17 year old back onto the streets for no reason.

Well, the reason was “lack of evidence” at his trial, but with someone like that you could basically lock them up for walking down the street with how much dirt he did in the streets. Especially teenagers, they don’t give a single fuck and sometimes need to be locked up for the safety of everyone else.

37

BasileusLeoIII t1_ixityv6 wrote

> but I have had a deep hatred of him ever since that temple kid got killed last year. Fucking idiot let a violent, uncontrollable 17 year old back onto the streets for no reason.

I'm sorry, which are you talking about? Off the top of my head I know two violent criminals that Krasner let walk, who immediately murdered a Temple kid.

Are you talking about the Krasner Kid who murdered Milan Loncar, or the Krasner Kid who murdered Sam Collington?

30

boobemaloo t1_ixiuyj1 wrote

After reading about the Milan Loncar story I started carrying cash or an old wallet every time I leave the house to walk the dog so i have something to give if I’m mugged. Truly insane that this is what we’ve come to

27

RustedRelics t1_ixj9fp7 wrote

That statement says just how bad things are. Sad, but smart.

14

chrisrobin92 t1_ixje7e2 wrote

Dude Ive been doing that for years. I used to stash my real cash in my shoes and keep a few bucks on my hip. I get that things are messy in the city atm but folks on here are acting like everybody got along prior to Krasner. If you think its meaner now than it has been historically then I have to question your memory.

My cousin got hospitalized by a mugger because he had nothing to give and that was 20 years ago.

3

boobemaloo t1_ixjfu7g wrote

I’ve lived here my entire life. Yes there’s always bad neighborhoods and bad things that can happen if you’re not paying attention. That’s part of living in a big city.

The threats were always there but now they occur much more frequently and that is an indisputable fact backed up by numbers. Here’s one for you; how many carjackings do you think there were in Philadelphia in 2019? The answer: 198 How many carjackings have there been in 2022? 1,210 and we’re not finished yet.

So to answer your question, yes it is considerably meaner now. My memory is just fine

16

Lightspeed1973 t1_ixjyfg2 wrote

I've lived in one Philly neighboorhood or another for over 40 years and it hasn't been as bad as it's been post-pandemic since the 80s. This is the first time I've changed my behavor. Until DST, I did all my errands during daylight hours unless absolutely necessary.

I'm not blaming Krasner or Kenney specifically. Violent crime is up everywhere, even in rural counties and places with conservative leadership.

11

K3R3G3 t1_ixky71j wrote

Yeah it's like "hey prison doesn't rehabilitate, so what should we do?" "Just let them out since it's not working." "But then won't they be wreaking havoc on the city?" "Meh."

I'd like to fully understand wtf is going on. The letting them out so quickly is unacceptable though and it's insanely unfair to the citizens and businesses. People get robbed because of this, carjacked, PTSD, beaten, killed, lose loved ones. Because violent POSs are let out. Lots of people don't want to accept it and want to love their city/home, saying it's not that bad and it's the fault of so and so, but dude. Look around. They are failing every citizen of the city.

For whatever reason, progressive policies, incompetence, zero care, all 3, is this letting everyone out so quickly why the police are on soft strike? Is it the ACAB stuff, the riots that occurred, and the fact that it's so possible that an officer will be thrown under the bus for doing their job if the court of public opinion and media machine deem it an unnecessary shoot? Does the city government not have the PPD's back?

Idk, man. But it's obvious things aren't working. Gotta understand what is actually going on before you can solve the problems.

8

[deleted] t1_ixmzxeh wrote

and it seems they have failed absolutely miserably, smacked him in the face, and has been obvious to everybody. yet this is his way. he victimizes criminals

0

ipissexcellence21 t1_ixmdur6 wrote

It’s very simple, move to a city where the people are so stupid they will elect a “progressive DA” aka a career defense attorney. Then when he shows everyone exactly what he’s up to for four years, releasing violent criminals the whole time, said dummies will go re-elect him. And his worshippers will be all over Reddit blaming everyone except him for the disaster.

4

cazzhmir t1_ixird1p wrote

I really genuinely support a more human-centered approach to prosecution for nonviolent and petty offenses. This should not have been one of those cases.

I understand what Krasner stands for, but this marks the continuation of a pattern of absolute nut-jobs slipping through the cracks, and then going on to swiftly reoffend in bold, but ultimately predictable ways.

You literally have the guy in custody for arson and aggravated assault. Surely there are ways to accurately assess his risk of not just reoffending, but once again brazenly violating person and property.

52

Aromat_Junkie t1_ixj0aa9 wrote

What we have is not working, our jail rates are very high, we have tough on crime, a police state that outranks most militaries worldwide in terms of weapons, personnel, budgets etc.

However, I don't think it's the place of the DA, who's job is to prosecute the laws on the books to be doing it with discretion.

Frankly I think there needs to be a whole lot less discretion.

Court cases now are like going into a used car dealership. Sticker price (proscribed punishments) have nothing to do with final results. Nobody goes to trial. Nobody finishes with the charges they started with. It's all behind the scenes dealing and juggling.

17

hellomondays t1_ixj0op5 wrote

It's always been that way, prosecutorial discretion is a core principle of functioning legal systems. Without it there would be more civil rights violations and our criminal justice system would be paralyzed by resources being spread even thinner than now.

5

Aromat_Junkie t1_ixjo7yu wrote

It's actually a problem. I'd rather more public outcry, and more juries nullifying outcomes for grannies getting sent to prison for 10 years for not putting their handicap sign in the window or whatever inane bullshit there is instead of the totally fake system we have now.

> our criminal justice system would be paralyzed by resources being spread even thinner than now.

Good. If the government can't prove guilt in a timely fashion, the innocent should not have to put up with it.

3

dreexel_dragoon t1_ixjc8g7 wrote

Getting rid of prosecutorial discretion is what got us shit like mandatory minimums

5

Aromat_Junkie t1_ixjod3k wrote

prosecutorial discretion is the reason why we need mandatory sentencing guidelines put out by the state so that judges cant run backroom deals for white dudes and let them out and put a bunch of black guys in prison for longer.

3

dreexel_dragoon t1_ixjohr1 wrote

My guy we literally tried these before and it failed categorically

5

Aromat_Junkie t1_ixjpdlt wrote

maybe man. all I know is that white women commit the same crime as black men and walk with less sentences. I know that prosecutors hold really high number of years over peoples heads to avoid going to trial. They endlessly delay delay delay and keep people who haven't been proven guilty or ever seen a jury locked in jail for years sometimes.

I bitched a LOT about the police department, but the more I realize how interconnected and fucked up the police, judges, DAs are all in on it. even public defenders telling you to cop a plea for something you didn't do. They're all in on it in some fashion or another. All playing a role in how fucking incredibly insane the situation is.

0

_token_black t1_ixkcb85 wrote

Philly is a prime example where failure at every level leads to a completely broken system. And no I don't only mean politically. I'm talking leadership in city entities, the FOP, Harrisburg, you name it.

1

TheBSQ t1_ixkerc7 wrote

This is my main gripe with the whole “Krasner sucks, no PPD sucks!” Arguments on this thread.

Shit is so broken. Mayor, PPD, FOP, DA, City Council, Harrisburg…everything.

There is no side anyone should be proud of supporting.

I do think you can argue that some are worse than others, and I’m not espousing some “both sides are equally at fault” but no one one’s hands are clean, and no one should feel proud.

It’s a fucking shit show.

I split my time between Philly and another city in another country, and I was watching a mayoral debate there recently, and it’s so weird to see a debate where, honestly, I’d be ok with any of the candidates, left, right, or center, because they all seem reasonable and competent, just with different priorities or philosophies for how to approach the city’s problems (eg, change regulations to make it easier for private companies to fix it versus raise taxes to fund a govt initiative to fix it).

It’s so fucking depressing to come back here where it’s just such a disgrace of incompetence all around with zero good options.

2

Aromat_Junkie t1_ixklkuq wrote

> It’s so fucking depressing to come back here where it’s just such a disgrace of incompetence all around with zero good options.

And that's why I left queue music

0

nnn62 t1_ixic9ui wrote

Hope they send that tweet to the state senate before they vote on Uncle Larr’s impeachment.

21

felldestroyed t1_ixj62ey wrote

Strange, the inquirer says he was sentenced to 11.5-22.5 months of confinement plus 2 years of probation. This twitter source has not always been accurate in the past.

13

NoWarButMyWar t1_ixkbyn6 wrote

Even with earned time for good behavior the very minimum he should’ve been able to get out of jail with is like 6.5 months on an 11.5 to 23 sentence (at least in Chester Co not sure about Philly but doubt it varies THAT much). So how much time did he really do is the question. Source: Was locked up.

2

felldestroyed t1_ixkdgb2 wrote

Tbh, I don't know; the information available online seems to be pretty dodgy and there's no way anyone will know more with out a FIRA request. My thought is there was an uncooperative witness in the assault and the arson/other 2 charges were thrown out because of the above. The pandemic happened and as with literally every other DA in the country, things were pled down to low sentences to get people through the legal system as quickly as possible. This guy was sentenced and never showed up to go to jail and walked scot free for 2 years before committing more crimes. Now, he'll be in jail for decades, especially since he violated his original sentence and it'll open him up to at least 10 years under sentencing guidelines.

3

_token_black t1_ixkbz34 wrote

I mean... do we really need to keep rehashing this?

Krasner's biggest mistake (of many) is having no Plan B when he didn't get universal buy-in on his plans, along with all the other issues (pissing off co-workers, running off prosecutors with no replacements, never compromising to his original plan).

Not throwing the book at every petty crime would work if PPD could weed out repeat offenders faster, or if arrest warrants were executed at anything but a snail's pace, or if somebody at City Hall figured out how to be proactive vs reactive (reacting to homeless encampments but now it feels like homelessness is worse and more widespread, and nobody is doing a thing).

The Krasner hate crowd isn't 100% wrong, but to think that the city will be fixed if he's gone is silly. Harrisburg (or at least 1/2 of the chamber there) will go back to ignoring the city until it wants to fight some culture war bs again.

4

[deleted] t1_ixn04j9 wrote

what on earth are you talking about, you idiot?

0

Adventurous_Key3647 t1_ixj7yc2 wrote

It’s because prison is a business and right now business is gooooood so good that they don’t have the room/ funds to hold everyone. They overpopulated with simple weed offenses and now they have no room for violent gremlins.

1

AgentDaxis t1_ixkejnd wrote

I knew you were trying to push a narrative here.

0

hellomondays t1_ixil330 wrote

Eh more severe punishments don't lead to less recidivism in the first place; locking people up for longer actually appears to increase their chances of recidivism slightly. Second of all, parole is going to be handled by the Parole board, not the DA's office. Third of all when it comes to what charges they negotiated, no DA office in the country is going to pull a lot of resources into a low profile AA and arson charges, even in wealthy counties they're overworked and will hope for a plea deal. You can blame city hall and the state for underfunding the criminal justice system.

−16

Franklinia_Alatamaha OP t1_ixilxgm wrote

>locking people up for longer actually appears to increase their chances of recidivism slightly

If he had gotten the 2-3 year minimum he was supposed to get int he first place, he would have literally been in state prison instead of committing home invasion robberies. This isn't a recidivism argument, this is "he should have never been on the streets in the first place" argument. And the sentencing guidelines support that argument. He got a literal small fraction of the sentence the guidelines said he should have gotten.

>Second of all, parole is going to be handled by the Parole board, not the DA's office.

I think you're not familiar with how parole works in this state. Since the DAO gave him a 3 month sentence, it made it a county sentence that he was automatically and immediately paroled from (again, at the recommendation of the DAO). If he as given a state sentence (anything more than a 1 year minimum), the parole decision goes to the DOC's parole board. By giving him a 3 month sentence, they removed the decision of parole from the parole board and made it a DAO negotiated sentence. State sentence release dates cannot be negotiated, so they avoided that "problem" by giving him a very short county sentence.

And

>Third of all when it comes to what charges they negotiated, no DA office in the country is going to pull a lot of resources into a low profile AA and arson charges, even in wealthy counties they're overworked and will hope for a plea deal.

There are 67 counties in PA. 66 of them would not have given this joke of a sentence.

33

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixiogzx wrote

Incapacitation is great and all but he would have been let go in two or three years. Do you have a crystal ball to show that the same result wouldn’t have happened later down the line? I’m sure you would’ve complained had he been arrested later on that the sentence of three years for aggravated assault was a joke.

Secondly, there are plenty of other counties that would’ve given that low of a sentence, for a wide variety of reasons. Reasons like limited prosecutorial resources, unwillingness of witnesses to testify, or just generally weak evidence from the police.

The guidelines are merely just guidelines - if he took it to trial and lost, he would’ve gotten a longer time in prison, but he gave up his right to a trial in exchange for a reduced sentence. And he still managed to get a probation violation warrant that Philly Police and the Sheriff’s Office ignored until after he was picked up for robbery.

−20

Franklinia_Alatamaha OP t1_ixipi1f wrote

>Incapacitation is great and all but he would have been let go in two or three years. Do you have a crystal ball to show that the same result wouldn’t have happened later down the line? I’m sure you would’ve complained had he been arrested later on that the sentence of three years for aggravated assault was a joke.

You went from "you don't have a crystal ball" to "you would have complained if the situation was different", and I think you did it unironically. You're completely off base with this, and you're now trying to use that crystal ball you hate so much.

If he was sentenced to a minimum like he should have been, he would have still been locked up. He physically could not have done what he did. He would have been sitting up at Phoenix or Coal Township or wherever.

The guy got 10% of the sentence that the sentencing guidelines called for. Objectively, unless you're Larry Krasner or Jane Roh, that is insanely stupid.

​

>Secondly, there are plenty of other counties that would’ve given that low of a sentence, for a wide variety of reasons. Reasons like limited prosecutorial resources, unwillingness of witnesses to testify, or just generally weak evidence from the police.

Respectfully, this is wrong. Philadelphia has a very well known reputation state wide for exactly these types of sentences. It is by far the most lenient county in the state. Anyone arguing the contrary isn't doing so from a good faith position.

17

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixiry6g wrote

No, what I’m saying is that you are fundamentally not happy with a sentence that’s not life plus cancer for any kind of violent crime. You think that any time a criminal reoffends that it’s a policy failure, yet you also probably don’t think that it’s a policy failure to keep someone incarcerated longer than necessary to prevent them from reoffending. Where are the righteously indignant Fox29 stories about elderly inmates taking up space in Laurel Highlands?

Bottom line is, this case is not a policy failure by the DAO. The severity of punishment is insignificant compared to the certainty of punishment. You’re missing the forest for the trees if all you consider is that this particular person wouldn’t have participated in this particular robbery if he had been given a marginally longer sentence.

−10

xaesk t1_ixj5xts wrote

>You’re missing the forest for the trees if all you consider is that this particular person wouldn’t have participated in this particular robbery if he had been given a marginally longer sentence.

I think you're just straight-up missing everything. If he's locked up for 3 years, he physically couldn't do something like this for... 3 years. I'd rather have him commit a crime once every 3 years over once every 3 months.

Though you're right, I do wish they could just give bozos like this life plus cancer. Whatever keeps violent criminals off the street the longest is best.

6

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixjats9 wrote

Well, you finally said the quiet part out loud, so I’ll give you credit for that.

−2

xaesk t1_ixjjpiv wrote

What's the quiet part? Keeping violent criminals, especially repeat ones, out of society for as long as possible?

4

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixjlcxq wrote

The quiet part is that you support mass incarceration

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States

5

xaesk t1_ixkkf1n wrote

I said that I support life for a person who's committed arson, aggravated assault, and broken into college student's homes and robbed them at gunpoint. I also said that we should keep repeat violent criminals out of society for as long as possible. What are you talking about?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_You_Talking_About!%3F

4

An_emperor_penguin t1_ixit55k wrote

You're right but 3 months for seriously injuring someone and some sort of arson? You still need a moderate punishment to make it work, I don't think a slap on the wrist for violent crime makes sense.

14

NoWarButMyWar t1_ixkcd7v wrote

I don’t know why you’re being downvoted all of what you said is true, it just doesn’t appeal to peoples emotions and thirst for revenge. Longer sentences actually don’t prevent recidivism, not anymore at least.

0

crispydukes t1_ixibhbh wrote

It depends on what the aggravated assault charges were exactly. You get road rage or into a bar fight, that's aggravated assault. Aggravated assault is many steps lower than armed robbery.

−19

Franklinia_Alatamaha OP t1_ixiekja wrote

This is not correct. They are almost exactly equal on the offense gravity score grading (and he was convicted of the higher Felony 1 Aggravated Assault): https://pcs.la.psu.edu/guidelines-statutes/sentencing/7th-edition-sentencing-guidelines/

Also, the arson charge alone for a first time offender called for a /minimum/ of a 2 to 4 year to 3 to 6 year state sentence. Instead of 22 to 36 months at the absolute minimum upstate, he got three months. And he was immediately paroled. And the DAO negotiated that sentence.

Dude literally got 10% the sentence he should have gotten.

37

sluman001 t1_ixiw3qq wrote

Not only that, but with a rap sheet like this, he’s not getting hired anywhere, so we end up with a desperate violent criminal back on the streets. This leniency only increases the odds of his crimes escalating.

13

An_emperor_penguin t1_ixikaqs wrote

Why would it change anything if he was arrested for a bar fight or road rage? Those are both pretty bad

8

crispydukes t1_ixip36i wrote

Because getting into a bar fight is not a direct indicator that someone is going to commit armed robbery...

People can be shitty humans and get into fights (aggravated assault). That doesn't mean they automatically lack enough morals to commit serious crimes.

−16

An_emperor_penguin t1_ixisda4 wrote

I think seriously injuring someone actually is an indicator of some bad things because most road rage/bar fights don't end in an arrest and sentence.

12

Hoyarugby t1_ixilfum wrote

can you remind me who is in charge of arresting people who have warrants out for their arrest

−26

nnn62 t1_ixinnmp wrote

Why was he even given the chance to be on probation in the first place for violent crimes like that is the question you should be asking. But you’re just a Krasner shill.

23

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixisds8 wrote

People get probation for violent crimes all the time, and not just in Philly. If he had been picked up for his probation violation, he wouldn’t have been able to commit the robbery

−5

nnn62 t1_ixitd66 wrote

We could just run around and around and around in circles here, if was prosecuted properly off the arson/agg assault charges…he wouldn’t have been able to commit the robbery either.

14

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixiu0ao wrote

So I hope you realize that this one case doesn’t prove anything categorically, but unfortunately some of the other comments here think this is evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors by Krasner

−3

nnn62 t1_ixiua84 wrote

But I do think this is a clear failure on the DAO. Like crystal clear.

11

AbsentEmpire t1_ixj9zlf wrote

Just keep ignoring that this is a frequent recurring issue with Krasner, and this case isn't a one off.

6

[deleted] t1_ixivwm9 wrote

[removed]

−10

nnn62 t1_ixixp1r wrote

No, but he does have a long track record of sweet heart plea deals for violent offenses, only to have the individual commit additional violent crimes.

And wtf are you even talking about “anti-vax?” Lol

11

Head_Ad_2827 t1_ixiebgf wrote

Just drop this dude off on an island far away from the rest of us.

48

ccommack t1_ixiv16h wrote

Oh, this guy was knocking over the Temple students who were selling weed to classmates because they were violating turf? Yeah, he's muscle for someone a lot bigger, throw the book at him.

41

LurkersWillLurk t1_ixikamj wrote

Big thanks to Philly Police and the Sheriff’s Office for not picking this guy up who had a warrant out for his arrest in the weeks that he went on his spree

18

Frontstunderel t1_ixizfup wrote

How the hell can this guy keep a job when he is pulling this crap so late at night??

17

dsbtc t1_ixjir4e wrote

Even criminals need 2 jobs these days smh

16

Cobey1 t1_ixjtka9 wrote

Really hoping they make an example out of this guy. Give this man the book and put him under the prison for every criminal in Philly to witness

14

Yolo_420_69 t1_ixj229e wrote

I feel like I've seen this guy's face before. Like in a mugshot

13

Adventurous_Key3647 t1_ixj7ofa wrote

Why do they always look 15 years older than they are? I’m guessing it’s the consistent diet of fast food, soda and absolutely zero water.

9

settledownguy t1_ixja4x9 wrote

Hahaha of course items were found at his home, not that he owns a home since clearly he’s a little bitch. Smart guy keeping the items at his residence bahahaha what an idiot

8

lanternfly_carcass t1_ixjwk6b wrote

There are so many stolen and dumped cars up here in Germantown. Really makes you wonder how many people like this live up here and if they're connected in some way.

2

Meandtheworld t1_ixk0q27 wrote

This is a classism thing. Got it.

2

Amart34 t1_ixkkioa wrote

Shame he was able to feel that comfortable doing that shit.

1

ChuckFromPhilly t1_ixknmw0 wrote

25? look at his hair line. Dude is 35 if he's a day

0

teknos1s t1_ixm4n06 wrote

Not exactly a fan of sharia but they might’ve been onto something with the whole thieves without hands cant thieve thing

0