Submitted by wowimsupergay t3_127lmbl in singularity
Animals can also see, hear, smell, touch etc. They have all those models too. But they don't have language, and thus can't share ideas, can't communicate at all, can only communicate in body language which is simply not enough.
But it goes deeper than that. You think in your own language, your self-reflection, your thought process, is chained together in your language. So that means animals cannot do that too! We hear about GPT being multimodal, and it is, but the problem is, it doesn't actually have visuals being fed back into it. It just gets passed The exact RGB data of a screen, and the chain of RGB (in bytes, so language, maybe math) and it is still able to "see" with just that. Same thing with hearing. To a certain extent, same thing with touching/feeling although there's a lot less data for that on the internet so it isn't as good.
But perhaps language is all we need? Maybe consciousness, maybe intelligence, is just an emergent property of big systems that are allowed to chain together ideas? Not just that, but big systems that are allowed to trade ideas. If that's the case, then language really is all we need.
Think about it for a sec. Your model of the world is in 3D space, and when I tell you to think about a water bottle, you might visualize the water bottle, and you might think about the crackling noise it makes when you squeeze it, and the feeling of the plastic, and the taste of the plastic if youve tasted it etc. But all of this explanation I've told you was in English!!! Your thought process about this water bottle happened in English! I prompted you to think about the water bottle in English! I described the water bottle to you in English! Not just that, you would have never known what the crackling feeling "was" unless somebody told you about it in English. You would have never learned about the physical properties of the water bottle, the underlying chemistry, unless somebody told you in English!
What if language really is all we need? What if language is the end all be all of all models? Trading ideas is huge, but better than that, being able to chain thinking processes, which is only possible in a language, since you do it in your language in your brain... That can only happen with underlying language understanding.
We skipped all of that when we made GPT. Having a visual/audible understanding of the world might actually be basically useless unless you plan on physically interacting with it. At some point GPT will get there too, but until then, we've taught her everything about the world in plain English, and she's able to think about the world thus in plain English. GPT is deaf, blind and unable to touch, but she still has a larger model of the world in plain English then all of us combined! What if language is all we need?
ShowerGrapes t1_jeeu8vn wrote
humans aren't the only animals with language. crows, for example, are capable of passing on knowledge to other crows and their offspring. and who knows how many other animals have had language in the earth's long history.
is it enough for intelligence? since we don't really know the origin of our own sentience, it's difficult to say.