Submitted by lindrios t3_yzj5ia in vermont

Hello my fellow Vermonters,

I am a housing activist throughout the state of Vermont and discovered some truly disturbing things.

This is my experience over the past year as an activist.

In late 2021 I was unable to find an apartment, and found myself living in a car as the winter months rolled around. I called 211 as advised for our unsheltered population, and within a few weeks found myself housed in the THP (Transitional Housing Program). This is a program funded by COVID related Federal allocations to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, and houses roughly 1500+ individuals.

While in the THP I found out that the average cost of a hotel room in the program is about $4,000/month, we can all agree this is a sizeable chunk of money.

The hotel that I was placed in, along with a large number of other hotels participating in the program have fallen into deplorable states of disrepair with blatant public health violations. Despite the ample funding that they are receiving, the hotel owners pocket the money instead of maintaining the property.

The hotel I was in had not cleaned any rooms, washed any linens, or done room maintenance in some of the rooms for over 12 months. I found a 70+ year old man on oxygen living in a room infested with mold, and sleeping on the same dirty sheets for over 11 months. When I asked the hotel owner to provide clean sheets for him, I was told "it is not profitable for me to wash sheets or towels". Another senior resident had a broken sink, he was given a 5 gallon bucket and told to "work it out himself".

How did things get so bad? Why are people not speaking up??

I decided to speak up and make it my personal passion project to figure out why and how.

This is where things started to get even uglier, shocking, and downright insane. My first step was speaking with hotel owners, this proved unhelpful as they are shameless with what they are doing. When I slipped on ice and hit my head off of a car in the parking lot, I asked the hotel owner to put salt down... His response "it is not my job to put salt down, it is YOUR job to look for ice". Just to give you an idea of the type of person he is.

Since communicating with hotel owners and administration was not effective, I stepped things up and decided to bring my information to the Economic Services Department, a division of the Department of Children and Families. DCF/ESD gave me a very simple bureaucratic response saying there is nothing they can do, but I could file an online complaint with the Vermont Department of Health Food and Lodging Program. So I did, I also encouraged others to do the same in an attempt to have conditions improved.

Unfortunately, no inspection is done by VDH in any of these circumstances (I will explain why in a bit). Instead the complaint is passed on to the hotel owners, who then use the information in the report to "evict" the individual who filed it with an illegal "24 hour notice" eviction. This ensures that no improvements are made. DCF/ESD say they have no way to prevent hotel owners from doing this because it is private property despite the THP having and Occupancy Agreement that states such things will not happen.

Myself, and several others were removed from the hotel for having legitimate public health and safety concerns. This has happened to hundreds throughout the state who speak-up about their conditions. I had to live in a tent for over 5 weeks because of this. After paying for campgrounds and camping gear this ended up costing more than $1000, most of what I had been able to save up for a deposit on an apartment.

So why is VDH not doing inspections? DCF/ESD and VDH are all under the umbrella of AHS, the Agency of Human Services. This should mean that they have open lines of communication with each other and are actively working on solutions together right? False.

DCF/ESD will say that they communicate with VDH concerning the issue. This is the only response they will give. VDH says they are working with DCF/ESD, however neither department can tell me what they are doing to improve conditions.

This is when I decided that a critical failure within the AHS must be taking place, and I had some investigating to do. I spent over a hundred hours reading health reports, and communicating with anyone in AHS who would talk to me. What I discovered was truly a shame.

The Vermont Department of Health makes OPEN distinctions between the population in hotels and based on this information it can push lodging inspections back for up to 24 months. This is blatant discrimination based on economic status. They believe that "vulnerable populations" do not deserve the same level of Public Health and Safety as our general public for some reason.

Interestingly, "Food" inspections are done more frequently. If the hotel has a kitchen, a health inspector will come and inspect the kitchen, but completely ignore any lodging complaints if the hotel is part of the Transitional Housing Program.

A fine example of this can be seen in the inspection report ID# 32569 for the Quality Inn Colchester/Burlington. At the time of this inspection, there were numerous complaints regarding doors to rooms not locking (a massive personal safety concern). However because of the population being housed, the Inspector was more concerned with the temperature of egg salad sandwiches dropped off by the Food Shelf, than ensuring that Lodging requirements were being met.

https://vtdoh.safefoodinspection.com/Common/ExternalFileViewer.aspx?ID=8379f7de-1d6e-40dc-b829-e40e70d6b886&Key=e26385a7-5192-421e-a4ac-5fa924bdfd53

This is a massive critical failure involving one of our states largest, and well funded Agencies. The very same agency that is tasked with overseeing the health and safety of others, discriminates towards those of lesser economic opportunity.

I think our general population and politicians would be sorely disappointed if they saw what is going on behind the scenes. Please spread the word and reach out to your local government so that we can ensure basic human rights to everyone in our beautiful state of Vermont.

Thanks for reading.

​

"At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed."

-- Frederick Douglass, 1852

​

EDIT:

Changed "advocate" to "activist" for more suitable terminology.

Corrected "organization" to "department" when referring to AHS divisions/departments.

Thanks for the feedback and positive discussions, I am looking forward to bringing more information forward regarding our housing programs in Vermont. Please send me a private message if you have some information regarding poor treatment of people within programs.

307

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

k75ct t1_ix0fvjq wrote

Can you bring this to the press?

60

lindrios OP t1_ix0gi9j wrote

I have brought this to the attention of many different press agencies and no one is interested in the story. I'm assuming that homeless people don't make "good stories"

44

anoftz t1_ix0jiia wrote

Was VT Digger one of the ones you tried? I would think this fits into their overall raison d'etre...

40

lindrios OP t1_ix0k4vn wrote

I just submitted this article to them, hopefully it will gain some traction this time around

38

deadowl t1_ix11chn wrote

Siegel brought up some of this at the debates with Phil Scott. Hoffer has also made a report about some of this as state auditor. This is a sign of corruption through-and-through.

State Auditor's report

38

lindrios OP t1_ix12rr0 wrote

The Homeless Report that Seven Days did at the bottom of that article was very insightful. A lot of valuable information in there.

23

deadowl t1_ix12x6b wrote

They're basically giving massive handouts to the hospitality industry instead of actually addressing housing issues.

32

lindrios OP t1_ix13vqi wrote

CORRECT!!

Lets call this what it really is, a "gross misallocation of resources while neglecting those in need"

23

Syncope7 t1_ix15nap wrote

Do you have their statement about profitability in writing? Or was it only said? If it's not in writing I could understand why press agencies wouldn't take the story, plausible deniability.

10

lindrios OP t1_ix15zqc wrote

I unfortunately do not have that on record, it was a verbal conversation.

9

Puzzleheaded_Post_26 t1_ix17ss5 wrote

Are any of the people (being housed in these conditions) refugees? If so, that might be the angle to take to get the media interested.

6

lindrios OP t1_ix18lm1 wrote

Refugees have their own separate programs pertaining to housing. However the same issues exist within those programs. The majority of the refugees around Winooski are housed in units owned by Bove's and Handy's. It's my understanding that the sheer number of units owned by these landlords gives them the upper hand when dealing with agencies/organizations.

13

Green_Message_6376 t1_ix0mn40 wrote

Wasn't there a similar issue reported about Harbor Place last year? seven days or VT digger. Same stories as OPs. There was a worker from COTS that complained and advocated for her clients, and she got 'fired', but not for this story of course, for different reasons (yeah right). A few of Vermont's non-profits could use an enema.

38

charliedontplaydat t1_ix35ttc wrote

Can you link me the COTS story please? I’m very interested

6

Green_Message_6376 t1_ix4ax37 wrote

I have no linking talent. But if you Google 'Seven Days: Kicked to the Curb' You'll get the article.

3

Left-Link5070 t1_ix3ytgy wrote

The not for profit world is very political. Just like everything else these days

5

hockeyschtick t1_ix11k06 wrote

This. Bring it to the press. The state needs to be doing walkthroughs, finding violations and pulling money out when necessary.

19

[deleted] t1_ix3rm9s wrote

The media wants us to hate each other. They're on the same side as the corporate hotel owners in the class war. If you bring this to the media, they'll make it an exposé on how your tax dollars are being wasted, and demonize the residents for trashing this poor job creator's property.

Better off trying to make it go viral on social media IMO. Harder for the owners of this country to control the narrative that way... The few decent journalists that remain can find it here too, and risk getting fired by the bosses when they report on it fairly.

7

deadowl t1_ix0eb7q wrote

This isn't one bit surprising.

43

Cold-Try6621 t1_ix2hjuo wrote

I had worked in this program for quite some time, and you are correct. It is an absolute disaster in every aspect. A lot of the hotels are absolutely negligent towards the state guests and their hotel conditions, with some of the staff throughout the state who I had been appalled by their behavior to not just the guests of the state, but people in general. I had witnessed a hotel manager shout orders at a disabled woman who was smoking a cigarrette on one of the curbs in the parking lot, exclaiming that she wasn't allowed to sit while she was smoking. Any disobedience would be met with the threat of eviction, and in the absence of the possibility of eviction, they would often be subjected to intense and consistent harrassment.

And the faults of the program don't lie with the hotels exclusively. I have seen countless incidents where economic services would out right lose or misplace paper work for people in desperate situations, putting people at risk for not only being unable to find housing, but for those who were looking to renew their housing as well. Economic services would also deny housing to most people that would require extra paper work. Immigrants of recent arrival would be looked over because they would have to be assigned a social security number. I only knew of one agent would was legitimately attempting to help, and would not look at the acquisition of a social security number as too much work. It's hard to say how many immigrants have been denied housing because of this.

Another big problem is the people living off of the program themselves. Most of them anyway, but not all. Some of the shittiest people I have ever come across in my life had been involved in this program(Guests, ESD, and Hotel staff.). I knew of one mother who would regularly leave her children unattended for hours at a time, sometimes leaving them with full diapers. Yes, diapers. They were that young. DCF wanted nothing to do with that case. And there were so many other instances of similarity. Some people came as recovering drug addicts, doing their best to change their lives. Many of them good people. But then there were those who had no interest in self improvement, inviting drug dealers and fellow users over to their rooms, threatening the safety of not only sober guests, but those who were trying to recover from addiction as well. Mental health was also a huge concern. I had worked with many people who had needs that far surpassed the hotels' accommodations.

Then there are the actual paying guests who visit these hotels. People who are lied to about hotel involvment in this state program. People who pay a lot of money to enjoy a restful night but who are instead fooled. Kept up at night by domestic disputes, arguments, barking dogs, police and rescue visits, etc. Everytime I would see a paying guest walk in to any of the hotels, I would wish I could tell them to run.

I could go on and on. I have far to many horror stories to share about this program. It is a fucking circus.

Although I would like to add a comment about the Days Inn, and the comment OP had made regarding them. The Days Inn in Colchester was top of the line in terms of the best places to be assigned through ESD. I was there when complaints about the doors not locking were circulating. First of all, it was only one door that was not secure, and to no fault of the door's. Although there is a bit of a security concern. An individual who did not seem to be of sound mind had walked right through the front doors, and began trying to open several doors to find a room to sleep in. They had found a door that was not fully shut and had walked in disturbing the sleeping guest. After the staff had been alerted, and the individual escorted out, the door was tested extensively after the guest had claimed his lock had not worked, allowing the individual access. The door was tested extensively and was found to operate just fine. It seemed the guest hadn't latched their door that night. Of course the guest, in his malcontent, stuck to the narrative that the doors in the hotel were not secure. I can confirm, that that is bullshit. Although, from my experience, the majority of night shift staff that Days Inn has held over the course of this program had often been wholly negligent in their duties. They often do not care enough, or are too busy sleeping, to stop any unidentified persons walking into the lobby at night per hotel policy. I must say though, besides their night time staff, Days Inn had been extremely accommodating to their guests, going so far as to even keep copies of completed paperwork for their guests, for when ESD would inevitably "lose or misplace" said paperwork. Anyone with a complaint regarding Days Inn, was often the source of their own problems.

As I said, I could go on for quite some time. Conclusively, the housing program is an absolute shit show. Composed of careless state workers, negligent hotels, and a vast number of shit people who have no right taking advantage of the program. And I didn't even touch on the role of law enforcement and security personell(Or rather, the lack thereof). The program should be reformed, and be more careful in their selection of applicants. Until then, this program is nothing more than a trash can where the state throws their unwanted, so they can keep their fabled pristine image of the Burlington and Montpelier areas free of the very real and underlying examples of the state's struggle with homelessness, mental health, addiction, and crime.

27

lindrios OP t1_ix2w5zf wrote

I wanted to clarify that my article mentions the "Quality" Inn and not the "Days" Inn.

The Days Inn is a resounding success within the THP as far as I am concerned. The hotel administration went above and beyond to bring in resources for mental health and substance abuse. Things that DCF/ESD were unable to accomplish. Their hotel is also clean and holds events for the children that are housed there.

The Quality Inn however has administration that's under the impression that they are running a "sober house" of sorts and doesn't adhere to many of the THP guidelines. The google reviews make some interesting accusations as well but I have not been able to confirm those.

I really appreciate hearing your experience with the program, there is a lot to unpack here and I would be interested in more details regarding your time working in the program.

13

Cold-Try6621 t1_ix3e5jj wrote

My apologies on the mix up. I'm actually surprised I misread that, I am well acquainted with the Quality Inn as well. I had the exact oposite experience with the Quality Inn that I had had with Days Inn. The Quality Inn is quite possibly a humanitarian micro-crisis. Not only have I had horrid experiences there, primarily with the hotel staff, but the rumors and stories circulating among the guests there were beyond concerning and certainly alarming. Not to mention the over all quality of living. The hotel manager of the Quality Inn is not only infamous from mentions of her in online reviews, but among the housing program community as well. ESD, other participating hotels and their staff, and additional involved parties are well acquainted with the renown hostility of that particular hotel and manager.

12

thisoneisnotasbad t1_ix9j0tg wrote

> Then there are the actual paying guests who visit these hotels.

I thought most of these places didn’t take paying guests once they started taking state guests. At least the hotels around where I am no longer take guests that are not from the state.

2

[deleted] t1_ix3qokp wrote

> Another big problem is the people living off of the program themselves.

I had to scroll past a mere two threads to find an American blaming the victim. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. Americans are such a wicked and cruel people.

Poverty is a failure of society, not the individual.

> This program is nothing more than a trash can where the state throws their unwanted

They're human beings, not garbage. Housing is a human right. That's not just a catchy woke political slogan, either. It's been defined as a basic human right under international law for decades now. That means every human deserves basic shelter, regardless of how rotten they are. Even Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein deserve human rights.

−4

Nemesis_Ghost t1_ix5goos wrote

>I had to scroll past a mere two threads to find an American blaming the victim. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. Americans are such a wicked and cruel people.

You obviously didn't read his whole comment, especially his conclusion. He specifically states that the issue is the program, those running it, and those taking advantage of it to remain the dregs of society. His complaint is not with those who want or need to use the program to help better themselves, but those who do not & actually make it hard for others.

5

[deleted] t1_ix5hejz wrote

Human rights shouldn't be conditional on using the program "to help better themselves." That's the whole problem! Who the hell do we think we are as a society, to place any demands on someone that we so graciously allowed to live in a dilapidated 150 sq ft room, anyway?

If you want to reform this program, take it out of the private sector. Seize the hotels for these violations, and tell the capitalists they're lucky we don't jail them for fraud. The private sector ghouls stealing $4000/mo in room fees are the only problem I see with this program. Should cost 1/10 of that, really. It's a shitty motel room, FFS.

I don't care if they're shooting heroin all day in that state funded room. Even with the brazen criminality of the private sector on display here, it's still a bargain compared to jail. Jail costs $10k a month.

I also don't care how much nuance that poster caged it in. Their core value underlying it all is they think some people are subhuman, that they don't deserve basic human rights, that housing is something to coerce others with. Always eating from the trashcan of ideology, we are.

4

Nemesis_Ghost t1_ix5i0q3 wrote

The difference is that we can't save everybody, especially those who do not want to be saved. Tax dollars have to be prioritized, and while we should try to do as much as we can, if someone wants to live a deplorable life they should be let to & not at the expense of those who do not. The people who abuse these programs are the ones who give them a bad name so that the programs become the target for funding cuts. You are naïve if you think otherwise.

−1

[deleted] t1_ix5iium wrote

Oh, for fuck's sake. The scarcity is artificial. We are the richest country in the history of the world. We can afford to house people. The scarcity is artificial. We need to start deprioritizing capitalism instead of human rights. The problem is systemic.

No, what makes the programs a target for funding cuts is this neoliberal brainrot, that makes people think human rights are negotiable to the whims of the market. Print more money. Money isn't even real FFS.

Society has made a conscious choice, to allow a couple rich assholes to spend $44 billion on fucking Twitter by not outlawing billionaires, instead of guaranteeing human rights.

The most amazing part to me is, Housing First policies were pioneered by freaking Utah. You're unironically further right wing on housing policy than the goddamn Mormons. This isn't radical stuff. The status quo of unrestricted capitalism is what is radical.

I am really not looking forward to what liberals like you do when the scarcity isn't just make-believe numbers on a computer screen. You're gonna turn to eco-fascism so goddamn fast, I guarantee it.

7

IrrigatedPancake t1_ix7p68b wrote

The issue is not a lack of tax dollars. It's that politicians who are seen to be helping people voters don't want to associate with get voted out of office.

1

random_vermonter t1_ix4230b wrote

Yeah I mean, WHO does he think this program is for? You're going to have people who are struggling who may be disrespectful and uncaring because they're in an untenable situation. They may make messes, disrupt the lives of others and do copious amounts of drugs. However, they are still human and should still be off of the streets where they're less of a danger to the public.

4

ninthamendment t1_ix0o2qz wrote

This is a powerful read. More people need to hear your story.

Did you reach out to your state representative and state senators? They keep saying affordable housing is going to be the number one thing this session. They need to hear this so they can make sure that situations such as yours are taken into account when they take this issue up.

22

FixatedOnYourBeauty t1_ix16fd8 wrote

Tip: add a tltr that is good enough to get people to actually read this. This sounds like an excellent grass roots cause, VT taxes are some of the highest in the land, there should be ample funding to manage this program with the relatively modest population. Also, with as messed up as the housing market AND the cost of heating and eating, many more may find themselves in need of services. Can you organize and reach out to news organizations and groups that look at these things on a national level? Think about all that Covid money that went out to sham small business only to buy fancy cars and new homes for scammers, it's enraging.

20

[deleted] t1_ix17xvb wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_ix18nq4 wrote

[deleted]

−1

lindrios OP t1_ix18zww wrote

Thanks for the tip, I'll keep that in mind for the future!

2

Trajikbpm t1_ix0eygp wrote

I don't think any buisness that get funding actually used it for what it was for. Maybe 1%.

It also gave them a reason not to hire and continue to claim staff shortage.

17

burke_no_sleeps t1_ix1ivez wrote

Fascinating and awful.

My own experience being homeless in this state shares some similarities to yours.

A good friend of mine, facing homelessness, said they refused to be housed at a hotel because of the frequent and obvious drug presence in the local hotels used for housing homeless people.

People talk about addiction and homelessness like they're personality flaws and not problems born out of a low-pay, low-housing, high-cost, high-stress culture.

Unfortunately the answer to every question seems to be "money" - why is this happening? How do we fix it? How do we permanently remove these issues from society?

Keep investigating. Keep pushing for answers. You need a team. Have you considered reaching out to other people and documenting homelessness and housing issues in the state, to be condensed, edited, and presented to the local presses, hopefully moving some change forward?

17

rivunel t1_ix12fqi wrote

I worked at a shelter in rutland for many years. The holiday Inn was disgusting the manager of the holiday Inn in rutland that came to speak with us was a pretty deplorable guy saying it was worth the cost of keeping them there at $74 dollars per person per night.

The state pays homeless shelters a MAXIMUM of 35.08 a night the last I knew generally it was closer to $5

The hotel program basically gave hotel owners money hand over fist like every other program put in place in the past 3-4 years they're are put in place to line the pockets of the already wealthy.

13

lindrios OP t1_ix13nsn wrote

This is really saddening to hear, I see no reason why a shelter should not be afforded the same funding as these hotels which are private.

12

Galadrond t1_ix6td1y wrote

The Cortina Inn is particularly egregious. It boggles the mind that the State just let these people charge whatever they want.

1

cloudydaytday t1_ix1gkyy wrote

AHS is also placing unhoused persons outside of their county, due to hotel overflow issues …and then, when the unhoused person is helped to find a slot in a transitional housing program, in their home county, the person is then refused the slot because they “reside outside of the county” and it is nearly impossible for ESD to communicate with the transitional housing programs to rectify this. It’s so baffling and heartbreaking to work with.

12

cloudydaytday t1_ix1gov0 wrote

Oh and then, they run out of the hotel money and end up outside again.

2

cloudydaytday t1_ix1gwqi wrote

And all this money being handed out to hotels and yes even people through VERAP almost ZERO case management to go with it. Real spectacular failure and I hate talking about it I’m so angry

12

Former-Stranger3672 t1_ix0hviq wrote

I am disappointed we haven't been able to come up with a better system: rural/ small towns tend to have small unsheltered populations, so seasonal shelters aren't a great fit either. The facilities have to be family friendly shelters or choose to be for adults only so that limits the populations it can serve (and small towns are rarely large enough to accommodate two separate shelters). It's difficult to find a pool of volunteers large enough to staff (and because it's overnights, is even more difficult to find volunteers), the insurance for temporary shelters is expensive, and its sometimes difficult to find locations for these temporary shelters (think "not in my backyard" now with the added difficulty in the rental market) Hotel vouchers seemed promising because they allowed for privacy, decreased worries about location/ volunteers/insurance. The amount of money it costs either way to house unsheltered populations is very high and especially problematic in rural New England (if we had higher population density and better public transportation some of the costs/issues would be decreased). Our money would be better spent toward keeping people in their own housing- whether that's through a guaranteed income, subsidies, job training, caseworkers who could assist people in getting jobs or housing or navigating fuel/ for assistance, or more plentiful and affordable housing, I don't know.... This is a complaint I've heard from other people who have experienced homelessness in VT, but I don't know what the solution is because fines or inspectors would probably not create better temporary housing, just less housing (these slum motels would not change, they'd just stop accepting these long term guests).

11

bonanzapineapple t1_ix2j9af wrote

This requires that "their own housing" is plentiful... Which it is not

2

Former-Stranger3672 t1_ix38zci wrote

Or in any better state of maintenance/oversight, which it is not either. There has been talk of using federal funds to encourage lower/mixed income housing to be built, but it's hard to do with VT zoning, the housing market, and the cost and availability of construction labor and materials.

3

YellowSubWinnie t1_ix0tc0o wrote

This extends to more than just the owners of these facilities, this extends to landlords. I can’t think of one property management group that ACTUALLY maintains their units. Painting a crack in the wall isn’t maintenance.

10

a_toadstool t1_ix1y3s6 wrote

They could’ve used all of those funds going into the program to create large shelters that are adequately stFfed and get paid well.

Unfortunately, the motels have become a cesspool with drugs and crime and I think that prevents the recovery of other populations

8

pro_conser333 t1_ix32292 wrote

My husband and I worked for a local motel during COVID and we were fired for asking to be paid minimum wage. We have an ongoing lawsuit against the owner for sexual discrimination, sexual harassment and a federal wage case. They are also being investigated for the deplorable conditions of the rooms. These local motels are being paid handsomely and treating the employees and guests as second class citizens. We have a lawyer in Williston that is amazing and a lawyer in Florida that specializes in these kinds of cases.

7

swordsmithy t1_ix3tbo4 wrote

The demand all Americans should be making of our political system is objective systems of accountability. Every service should have measurable short and long term objectives, and each program should be required to report data showing their performance.

3

swordsmithy t1_ix3tpcc wrote

This is also why programs like Built for Zero show success - there are tons of organizations that are trying to alleviate housing problems but there is no unified system for participants so each program duplicates administrative work.

2

gump82 t1_ix1abwy wrote

It is very obvious to me that the people of the Vermont could not give a shit about this population. If they truly wish to do some thing they would, but this will continue unabated and unchecked! I’m sorry I wish it wasn’t true it just is. It’s better to be more concerned about whatever it is. Vermonters are concerned about if they wanted some thing to happen, it would.

2

ceiffhikare t1_ix34o7i wrote

Like a lot of issues in the state there are limited actions we the people can take. We have 2 chances every election cycle to get someone halfway decent into office who will address the issues that main street VT needs fixed. Thats it! The primary and general elections, no ballot referendum to choose the policies and laws we live under, No recall powers of the people to remove bad actors once they are in power, until that changes i feel that any other changes will be like the legalization fight.. 5 election cycles and 15 years to eventually get anything done where a question on a ballot could have solved the problem fast.

2

Oeslian t1_ix38ir4 wrote

I don’t actually see the state following through on major habitability issues in Apartments, it really doesn’t shock me to see the same attitude towards lodgings for the poor. We have great protections on book in this state, but the agencies refuse to enforce the law.

2

thebimmerbabe t1_ix3eylf wrote

Would it be ok for us to connect via private message? Given the blatant fair housing violations, there is an opportunity for a class action lawsuit against the state. I'm so sorry you've had this experience, but I can help. Thank you so much for sharing.

2

random_vermonter t1_ix40sjk wrote

This is why I do not want to be in a hotel if I cannot find housing down the road. It's below me and others who deserve better.

2

newnemo t1_ix5b8p4 wrote

Jimmy Carter's Habitat for Humanity has a presence here in VT that you might want to check out.

The terms for qualifying is provided in the website below. There is also a link section to find local resources. Some of the websites listed for VT aren't active but some are and it might be there are other means to contact them.

https://www.habitat.org/housing-help/apply

Hope this might prove helpful. Considering the housing crisis in VT, I'm surprised that there isn't more activity but I could well be out of the loop,

2

CertifiableX t1_ix6wfdh wrote

I empathize with your situation, and hope things work out for you.

I hate to ask, but what was the hotel’s rates prior to COVID? Since it’s 2022, I’m assuming these are long term guests? And since the guests were through a government program, I assume they can’t be evicted?

if the hotel’s rates were higher than $133.34 ($4000/30) a night, then the establishment would be losing money on these guests. If the hotel is losing money on guests that don’t leave, what incentive is there to provide good service? Good service has costs in labor and material. Can they recoup these costs at that rate?

What I imagined happened was that when COVID hit, and everyone stopped traveling, and the hotel was desperate for any income, and agreed (or were required) to accept any business they could get. This was even if it didn’t cover their costs, but just to remain in business. Now that things are getting back to normal, they have a number of unprofitable customers, that they cannot raise prices on to match the current rates.

From what I’ve seen, most business, including hotels, have very thin profit margins. They can’t charge more than local competitors without losing customers.

I applaud you for complaining to the alphabet soup of government agencies you mentioned about the conditions you have seen, as the hotel probably agreed to maintain services. Keep up the good work.

2

Like_n_subscribe t1_ix7opnv wrote

Have you reached out to any press? I sorry this has been your experience and admire your resilience.

2

NotGodsThrowaway t1_ixccz1i wrote

This is where you start by contacting every media outlet within a 250 mile radius.

Shame and outrage makes government move.

2

iflyrcinvt t1_ix39w6h wrote

As lovely as we find our home state to be our government agencies, especially DCF are not in any way benevolent or compassionate toward the humans they are supposed to serve. Corruption and abuse are rampant at these agencies. Profits over people is the golden rule. Whether it's your children in contested divorce or as here with our vulnerable homeless/economically challenged population, DCF will mess up your life and carry on like nothing. Complaints via official channels will be ignored and the press won't touch these issues with a ten foot pole. There is much to love and be proud of here in Vermont but the VT Department of Children and Families is not included.

1

[deleted] t1_ix3ppvu wrote

What's most blackpilling about this situation, IMO, is that 90% of Americans will observe the same thing as you did, and immediately blame the victims for the deplorable slum conditions at these hotels. Landlords and capitalists feast off our suffering and then convince us to hate the victim instead of the oppressor. Or, as Malcolm X put it far more eloquently,

> If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.

The average American will use these conditions that violate basic human rights as a reason to support even more austerity. Oh, just look at what *those people* do when we give them nice things. They just destroy them! Surely we must cut what little remains of the social safety net. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps! (willfully ignorant that the whole point of that idiom is that it is impossible)

We are a country populated mostly by demons, with no semblance of morality left whatsoever. The only American value that remains is greed. Glad there's still a few good ones left out there like you, OP. I wish you the best of luck in trying to make things a bit less awful in your neck of the woods. But you must know, it's an uphill battle when you're living in a failed state. This thing we call America is dead already.

−3

Norse-Gael-Heathen t1_ix1a4un wrote

Reality Check: Anyone with a nice motel is renting to tourists and has no interest in housing the homeless. There simply are no homeless shelter beds available, especially for families (with a few notable exceptions, which are at capacity.) So the State looks for anywhere they can house people...and this means shoddy motels that would otherwise simply shut down. They're not going to sign up these facilities if it comes with a laundry list of 'code' violations to be corrected at the owners expense. They determined that an available, poorly-maintained housing unit is better than your car. You can make that determination, too.

−4

lindrios OP t1_ix1cacv wrote

Incorrect, there are many successful hotels in the state that are participating in the THP that are still open to the public. Meeting health guidelines is simple.

I agree that there simply is no where better to move these people to, and a bed is a bed. However with these hotels receiving around $4k/month per room... on the low end each hotel having 30+ rooms in the program that's over $120k guaranteed income each month. They can absolutely be maintained at the "owners expense". At over two years into the program any property failing to meet "code" is on the behalf of the owners poor property maintenance and misallocation of funds.

12

Norse-Gael-Heathen t1_ix1dgua wrote

Clearly we live in different areas of the state. Most near me have 8 to 10 units. All arguments to the contrary, the basic fact is: If the state had the rooms, they wouldn't have signed these places up to begin with, knowing what they were like...and none of these motels would have agreed to the arrangement if it meant engaging in a fix-up project they had already decided against doing.

The larger hotels that participate with mixed homeless/tourist residencies are hotels in trouble. No hotel with a vibrant tourist trade participates. They are even reluctant to house temporary construction workers.

2

Vermonter623 t1_ix12f92 wrote

You are describing government bloat and waste that conservatives always complain about. And for good reason. These lazy state employees are more than happy to take a basically free paycheck every week but lord forbid they actually do anything that would benefit real people they aren’t related to. But don’t you dare take their wasteful pensions that we are stuck footing the bill for

−17

lindrios OP t1_ix13e4u wrote

The GA Housing Supervisor with ESD has been refusing to answer my emails for months. The latest reply was from her supervisor asking me to submit a "public information request as this is how advocacy organizations obtain information"

Openly deflecting all questions and communications on possible solutions.

I am not an organization obviously, I provided my own SS# and asked why this is happening.

9

Vermonter623 t1_ix15r9a wrote

I honestly feel sorry for you. A lot of these people that own these motels are from shithole countries that are grossly overpopulated and filled to the brim with trash. They don’t treat other very well as they are treated like trash themselves. I stayed in a motel owned by said people and it was fucking disgusting.

−22

raydiantgarden t1_ix204lx wrote

you’re a disgusting human being.

10

Vermonter623 t1_ix3oqls wrote

The tolerant left

−5

raydiantgarden t1_ix3phdi wrote

google the paradox of tolerance :)

5

Vermonter623 t1_ix3vlk9 wrote

Your anger knows no bounds. You seem to be waiting to be outraged by something or someone you disagree with. People can have different views than you. Try not to be so narcissistic

−1

edthesmokebeard t1_ix1a42c wrote

"Housing advocate" is not a job.

−19

lindrios OP t1_ix1b51h wrote

You're correct, its a descriptive term used to describe someone who publicly supports a particular cause. In this case, its Housing.

Thus the term "Housing Advocate"

13

VoyageursWitch t1_ix44ov7 wrote

Neither is bowler but if this was a post about bowling and the OP described themselves as a bowler you'd have no objections.

1