09212
09212 t1_je9vj68 wrote
Reply to comment by ImPattMan in Are audiophile headphones that noticeable? by BicBoiBen
or… they just didn’t fit his preferences?
those headphones represent one type of frequency response lol. they’re incredibly neutral with a slight tilt towards brightness. i can absolutely see how they could sound “shrill” or “thin” to a newcomer, especially the beyers which are outright sibilant at times
that’s not to say i don’t like them — but i wouldn’t have enjoyed them if they were my first cans. i’m still glad i invested in other headphones
09212 t1_je9th3i wrote
looks like i’m never buying hifimans lol
09212 t1_jacgn50 wrote
Reply to comment by oratory1990 in The Sennheiser veil is too real by rob417
yeah exactly. i was just pointing out that whichever way you put it, it’s not a 27 year old headphone
09212 t1_jac36or wrote
Reply to Is Apple Music good? by resurgences
if you have an iphone, i’d definitely recommend apple over tidal. its android app is a little choppy
sadly its recommendation system is absolute garbage compared to spotify’s, but what can you do
09212 t1_jac2wrf wrote
Reply to comment by Eezywhippet in The Sennheiser veil is too real by rob417
>a wow factor comes from something being over done, whether it’s soundstage, treble etc
based as fuck, and very well said
the “wow factor” that people mention with the hd6x0 series only really occurs when people go from their beats or $20 earphones to a proper headphone for the very first time. i’m sure of this — especially considering the hd600 and hd650 are the most popular choices when it comes to reference open-backs
my r70x also sounds just right. it’s insanely neutral. yet i still experienced the “wow factor” purely because i’d never heard good sound before. i would’ve experienced the same thing if i’d went with an hd650 instead, but if i were to buy one now i’d probably feel like i wasted my money.
diminishing returns are huge in this hobby. it’s kinda crazy how some people just aren’t aware of that
09212 t1_jac2d1j wrote
Reply to comment by miles971 in The Sennheiser veil is too real by rob417
are you lost
the hd6xx came out like 6 years ago and they’re based on a 20 year old headphone
09212 t1_ja4wpca wrote
Reply to comment by wijnandsj in Crin signed the delta airlines ( W ) by Clickbaitllama
LMAO
09212 t1_ja4wc0l wrote
Reply to comment by West-Cheek-156 in How do I listen for "detail" in music? by West-Cheek-156
i can fully attest to this, yet i still think it's just due to the (intentional or unintentional) differences between headphones, and not a sign of 'better' technical capabilities. differing tonalities, imaging/separation capabilities and whatever else means that different headphones will make some 'details' more audible than others
probably
09212 t1_ja4th0s wrote
Reply to comment by West-Cheek-156 in How do I listen for "detail" in music? by West-Cheek-156
not exactly, but not too far off either
tuning isn't what makes a headphone, technical performance (which includes detail retrieval, staging and imaging, etc) has an equal part to play. the entire build/fit of a headphone also drastically affects the sound. placing one headphone's driver in another's casing would not give you the same sound, for example
09212 t1_je9wofg wrote
Reply to comment by ImPattMan in Are audiophile headphones that noticeable? by BicBoiBen
i’m not trying to start an argument here. but have you actually tried them?