EveryDayIsAGif

EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j52zi wrote

nope, they are different. You are talking about plurality voting, which has major flaws: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurality_voting#Disadvantages

Ranked choice's most important feature, the reason people are willing to sign up for the added complexity, is that it actually gets people elected who represent the will of the people. It will have a centering effect on many elections.

3

EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j2cu7 wrote

you are misunderstanding the original commenter's meaning. Bob Kiss actually had ~52% of the vote using IRV... this is why he won at the end of Round 3. His 29% total at the end of Round 1 is what you are likely remembering.

I'm not sure the details of why Burlington's education efforts failed... but there are many success stories we can look to and learn from now.

3

EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j02b7 wrote

It sounds like you are remembering the gripes of the 2009 mayoral election in Burlington specifically? I would ask that you consider the many, many more success stories. Ranked-choice elects candidates who more accurately represent the will of the populace they govern and to me that is very worth the change

3

EveryDayIsAGif t1_j42ie9q wrote

I think there is nuance to the situation which makes it tough to say one path is definitely better than another.

Different banks and even different account types within the same bank will charge you differently for the same exchange. When I have been in your position in the past I read through my bank/debit/credit card terms and made the decision from there.

3