EveryDayIsAGif
EveryDayIsAGif t1_jaokuuq wrote
Reply to Beware of Norovirus! (stomach bug) by cpujockey
where in the state is it happening?
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j71u7ls wrote
Reply to comment by Commercial_Case_7475 in Musings on solution to housing crisis while driving around VT. by woburnite
Don't worry, I can assure you it's quite all-white
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j64yj wrote
Reply to comment by reidfleming2k20 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
actually, the city councilor vote was vetoed by Miro. Ranked choice was passed by the voters directly and with strong support. Personally, I trust that sort of a result
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j52zi wrote
Reply to comment by sbvtguy34567 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
nope, they are different. You are talking about plurality voting, which has major flaws: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurality_voting#Disadvantages
Ranked choice's most important feature, the reason people are willing to sign up for the added complexity, is that it actually gets people elected who represent the will of the people. It will have a centering effect on many elections.
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j3pwn wrote
Reply to comment by reidfleming2k20 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
may be so - I was not following the story at the time. To me the major tell is that those same Burlingtonians who repealed ranked choice in 2010 voted to reinstate it in 2021.
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j2cu7 wrote
Reply to comment by reidfleming2k20 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
you are misunderstanding the original commenter's meaning. Bob Kiss actually had ~52% of the vote using IRV... this is why he won at the end of Round 3. His 29% total at the end of Round 1 is what you are likely remembering.
I'm not sure the details of why Burlington's education efforts failed... but there are many success stories we can look to and learn from now.
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j0pzg wrote
Reply to comment by sbvtguy34567 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
this method continues encouraging people to hedge their vote - voting against a candidate they dislike rather than for a candidate they really want. The beauty of ranked choice is that there is no need to hedge.
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6j02b7 wrote
Reply to comment by reidfleming2k20 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
It sounds like you are remembering the gripes of the 2009 mayoral election in Burlington specifically? I would ask that you consider the many, many more success stories. Ranked-choice elects candidates who more accurately represent the will of the populace they govern and to me that is very worth the change
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j6hycqv wrote
Reply to comment by reidfleming2k20 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
Personally I think that the "just don't get it" is a symptom which can be solved with education and time, especially education of children and young adults.
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j4v63bt wrote
Reply to comment by here_f1shy_f1shy in Vermont listed as possible future habitat for mountain lions by willynillyslide
just shoot one again to clear up the confusion!
EveryDayIsAGif t1_j42ie9q wrote
Reply to comment by quartadecima in Best way to get CAD: here or there? by quartadecima
I think there is nuance to the situation which makes it tough to say one path is definitely better than another.
Different banks and even different account types within the same bank will charge you differently for the same exchange. When I have been in your position in the past I read through my bank/debit/credit card terms and made the decision from there.
EveryDayIsAGif t1_jbfvsa1 wrote
Reply to comment by mmartino03 in Vermont vs New Hampshire by Lucky-Specialist-790
Here's a population density map of new england: https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/pizl2o/population_density_of_new_england_municipalities/