RecommendationOld525

RecommendationOld525 t1_j6tda8l wrote

It should come as no surprise that not all unhoused people are the same. There are many different ways to be unhoused, many different reasons to be unhoused, and many different circumstances in which those folks are living (e.g. with their family, battling a drug addiction, working one or more jobs, multiple things). There are vastly different things that different unhoused people need, and I think what this article may be getting at is that the city isn’t offering enough of those different resources. (And maybe they can’t.)

For example, there’s a nonprofit that specifically helps women in shelters with financial literacy who have escaped abusive homes where they never learned how to manage money. That is a very specific problem that could make a huge difference for some people. We think a lot about the part where unhoused people may be dealing with drug additions and/or mental illness (I can’t imagine being unhoused for a prolonged amount of time and not having some kind of mental illness considering how stressful that must be), but there is also no one solution to how to handle that.

Yes, there are inevitably some unhoused people who do bad, destructive things, who are incredibly difficult to provide care for because they don’t want it. But I think it’s a bad faith argument to abandon anyone and especially to use those folks as an example as to why other unhoused people don’t deserve to be supported. And I think it’s because of that perspective that some unhoused folks don’t want to be lumped in with others.

6

RecommendationOld525 t1_izlztd9 wrote

I don’t eat McDonalds anymore, but several years ago on my way home from a drunken early-twenties night on the town, I drunk bought some fries and put the bag in my purse. While on the subway ride home, I knew I was going to vomit. I carefully removed the fry containers from the McDonalds bag and placed them in my purse, and promptly vomited in the then-empty McDonalds bag. When I got off at my stop a few minutes later, I dropped the McDonalds bag of vomit in a trash can and walked home where I feasted drunkenly on my fries.

Thanks, McDonalds. 👍

1

RecommendationOld525 t1_iwtgp60 wrote

Looking at your post and comment history, you seem obsessed with crime in NYC, so I don’t think it’s worth engaging with you because I don’t think you’re engaging in good faith.

But just one thing quickly: women and people of color are not exempt from being abusive assholes. And nowhere did I say anything you’re pretending I said. Please take your energy elsewhere, thank you.

10

RecommendationOld525 t1_iwtdikt wrote

Great article. Thank you for the reporting and for sharing!

On a different note, to draw attention to the closing quote: “In this moment bold remedies are necessary, and this administration is ready, willing, and legally able to take such steps.” LOL the Adams administration is capable of bold remedies? Like the War on Rats? Sure, Jan.

We need to close Rikers. It clearly can’t be fixed. I’m pro-union except for unions for law enforcement and correctional officers. Too many bad applies that actively harm others are being protected.

3

RecommendationOld525 t1_iwspcky wrote

A cabbie refused me service after a Mets game because (I suspect) I wasn’t going far enough for them to get a high fare. 🙄 (I would’ve taken the subway, but I was with my dad, and he was in substantial pain due to his sciatica so going up the stairs since there’s no freaking elevator at Mets Willets Point would have been murder. We took an Uber instead.)

3

RecommendationOld525 t1_iugy3ow wrote

The more police I see, the less safe I feel, especially when I’m in a crowded subway station and they’re holding semi-automatic rifles. :)

EDIT: Glad to know y’all don’t worry at all about being a victim of police violence considering all the downvotes I’ve gotten. Must be nice to live in that world.

−9