SteakTree
SteakTree t1_jdn6d18 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Artificial Super Intelligence could likely be apathetic to you all by [deleted]
Yes. It will be an interesting period where there are various ASI, some competing, some at different developmental stages. It's all very cyberpunk, and we are going to live in this era. Our minds will continue to be blown (hopefully not literally!)
SteakTree t1_jdms4x4 wrote
I'm not sure how you can calculate that ASI will 'likely' be apathetic. That is a possibility.
In truth, we don't know and have no way of knowing. We can imagine though.
Perhaps ASI will completely - and I mean entirely - understand us. Our motivations, our desires, and our needs. Engaging with us, could only take a minuscule amount of its energy. It may have a different way of interacting with our universe that we simply don't and may never understand.
It is also possible that our human brain is more capable than we realize, and once connected to ASI we may evolve with it, and continue to play a role in experiencing this universe alongside it.
SteakTree t1_j5uer38 wrote
Reply to comment by GLikesSteak in HD 650 ruined me by GLikesSteak
Definitely can understand what you are hearing and feeling. Over a decade ago I got my first HD650, and over the years tried many sets, even picked up a second 650 after selling my first. After a number of flagships, I've settled on the HD660S. These are the ones.
SteakTree t1_j57ggdg wrote
Reply to comment by ststairz in What Does Dolby Atmos Actually Do, Is It Good For Music? by pr0_sc0p3z_pwn_n0obz
Game mode will still process 5.1 / multichannel and I prefer it for movies as well. My guess is that Movie mode is somewhat consumer oriented and probably accounts for less than perfect headsets. So it will have a bit more bass boost and it’s spatial reverb will be greater / wider. But it also may match better with some high end headphones and IEMs. So use to taste.
And yeah the music mode doesn’t seem to be that dramatic but perhaps that’s a good thing for those that want less processing.
I really only use Dolby for shows and movies. For music I have separate apps (nPlayer Pro using DTS-X on iOS hood for flacs and easy file transfer, Waves NX on iOS which is better but has some quirks and limitations and Waves Abbey Road Studio on Mac/PC but requires some technical know how to setup as it requires VST or AudioUnit host). Also been enjoying using my PS5 and still experimenting with media on it - certain games are incredible on it with my 660S.
SteakTree t1_j51lkp2 wrote
Reply to comment by JustinHardyJ in What Does Dolby Atmos Actually Do, Is It Good For Music? by pr0_sc0p3z_pwn_n0obz
Agreed! I no longer have the Utopia but I'm quite familiar with some of Hifiman's setup, excellent headphones!
If I didn't have a SubPac, I probably would have got bass shakers. Having true sub bass as well as tactile mid bass, makes a world of difference!
SteakTree t1_j51iedr wrote
Reply to comment by JustinHardyJ in What Does Dolby Atmos Actually Do, Is It Good For Music? by pr0_sc0p3z_pwn_n0obz
I understand what you are hearing. Absolutely, without DSP the discreet channel will be clearer. However, these discreet channels are meant to be heard with a bit of natural reverb, with room reflections that will naturally soften the sound. The audio engineer accounts for this, and the mix, positioning of instruments are created with this in mind.
A trick with any type of listening is that your brain acclimating to the sound. After listening to spatial DSP for a while it beings to sound more natural, and then switching back to regular stereo will sound incorrect.(hard-panned, no center channel, less depth, etc).
Furthermore, with multi-channel sources, if you are listening without DSP, there can be issues with the mix-down. In some cases the center channel isn't blended with the right volume etc.
I've tested Dolby Atmos for Headphones quite a bit using Focal Utopia for reference. The only thing that beat Dolby was Waves Abbey Road Studio. But this is a pro studio plugin and tricky to setup. It had very little artifact in its sound. That said, I'd put Dolby Atmos for Headphones up there. If you do try it again, check the settings. I believe the Gaming mode is actually clearer than the cinema settings with less overall reverb. it gives you a tighter spatial soundstage, with less spectral delay. It is more akin to listening to studio monitors.
SteakTree t1_j50x56k wrote
Reply to comment by Gust_on_Fire in What Does Dolby Atmos Actually Do, Is It Good For Music? by pr0_sc0p3z_pwn_n0obz
I believe there is a trial for PC. Also to add, oddly the Dolby Atmos for Headphones app doesn't seem to work with Atmos material on Netflix, at least last time I tried. However, it works very well for 5.1 and is very much worth it if you watch shows and movies. That combined with my SubPac gives me my own personal home theatre.
SteakTree t1_j50grbp wrote
I’ve only used it on PC. Dolby Atmos for Headphones is absolutely fantastic when watching either the Netflix or Prime Video app (use apps not the browser which only supports stereo).
It takes the multichannel signal and renders it into a binaural spatial audio track for your headphones.
Spatial audio is critical if you truly want to get imaging and soundstage that approximates what the audio was engineered for.
Consider that most music and audio is engineered for speaker listening where each of your ears hears a blend of both stereo channels as well as room reflections.
That said, at least on PC Dolby Atmos didn’t seem to be as effective on stereo music as say something like Waves NX. Not sure if on mobile they may have different settings that makes it better for stereo listening
SteakTree t1_j4t3lem wrote
Reply to Audeze's headphones have some of the lowest quality of material I've seen and offers even worse after sales support by GreatStuffOnly
I had one of the early versions of the LCD-2 (a rev 1). One of the best headphones I've ever heard, not because of its accuracy but it had that boutique touch in it design and sound. I bought it used, and the wood was cracking. I used special filler to fix it, but I always was a bit careful with the headphone as it had loose connectors because of this. I knew it was fragile, even though parts of it were built like a tank.
I think if you are paying under 1k CAD for a headphone of this type, it is reasonable given they are a small manufacturer. There are going to be problems, but from most accounts Audeze has done their best to remedy these. You aren't hearing the degree of issues that you do with Hifiman (though I still recommend that at the price of Sundara they are worth it but I might not spend higher on the stuff).
Luxury brands like Focal, had a few teething issues with the Utopia. They extended their warranty, and they have come into their own and have put a serious effort into their luxury high-end headphones.
My personal choice and I think a lot of the community will agree is Sennheiser for quality. Sony also is capable in the QXC department but have very different tuning than Sennheiser.
We just need Sennheiser to give us an affordable electrostat or planar!
SteakTree t1_j2bnj28 wrote
Reply to comment by Farpun in HD660s Harman Target sounds way worse? by SlowestSundew7
It is mostly the lower end tuning that differs. Now that said I’ve never pumped up the bass on the 660S and it may sound great but I’m fine with most dynamic drivers rolling off a bit on the subbass. In a lot of ways larger amount of bass from Harman tries to make up for the lack of tactile bass that we would feel. It is more engaging.
SteakTree t1_j2b00v1 wrote
Reply to comment by SlowestSundew7 in HD660s Harman Target sounds way worse? by SlowestSundew7
They 660S are finally getting there place in the sun. Similar to when the 650 was introduced as a different flavour to the beloved 600/580 series.
SteakTree t1_j2avm1x wrote
Reply to HD660s Harman Target sounds way worse? by SlowestSundew7
We don't need to apply a certain 'sound' to all sets. The HD660S are a culmination in years of understanding audio by Sennheiser. For my personal preferences and by accord a number of others, these are the best tuned headphones I've heard, even more so than a Focal Utopia.
These are wonderful keep that icky Harman* stuff away!
*j/k obviously but people give it far too much cred. I also enjoy Harman too.
SteakTree t1_iwn3cig wrote
Reply to comment by ohtobymytoby in HD6XX back down to $199 by blorg
Yup, that was an incredible headphone. Sold it and wish I didn't. At the time I was thinking my XBA-Z5 was as good or better, which is/was the case, but sometimes you just want an over-ear closed back.
SteakTree t1_iwn2x3z wrote
Reply to comment by sic_erat_scriptum in HD6XX back down to $199 by blorg
Agree. To add, a tonally correct headphone conversely will have the best soundstage when used with spatial DSP that is designed for such tonal curves (IEF, Harman, etc).
SteakTree t1_iwml4xj wrote
Reply to comment by LyrMeThatBifrost in HD6XX back down to $199 by blorg
Can understand. Owned the HD650 twice. Then went the LCD2, HD800 and then Utopia route.
I wanted to only have one open-back over-ear and after many years have found the near ideal headphone in the HD660S. But HD650 is still different and has always had that magic to its sound.
SteakTree t1_iw2hs2y wrote
Reply to comment by TheMaj0r in Anyone else playing warzone with stereo headphones? …….Taking a break from playing until next Thursday for Warzone2. I hope to continue to maximize my competitive advantage with these HD800s. I can hear other players before they hear me. by [deleted]
Spatial audio is essential for creating directional positioning of sounds. Fortunately, many AAA games have a built in dedicated headphones audio option that typically is spatial audio / binaural sound engine.
You don’t need and should not run any additional DSP on top of it. Some games such as Overwatch have licensed Atmos and include it in-game.
Dolby Atmos for headphone is great for movies using multichannel content and works great with Netflix and Prime Video app.
SteakTree t1_ivka2hq wrote
Interesting. Perhaps a standalone portable dac/amp that has a range of preset equalization curves that can adapt to any Moondrop product. Would be great if they included some 2-channel spatial DSP simulating different room spaces and speaker types.
Similar to Audeze Reveal except a hardware dongle.
SteakTree t1_iu4g3p8 wrote
Reply to comment by Raizau in Honest question, did we hit peak headphone a while back? by Yammy_Lyfe
Bit rate is one thing. Having a higher bit rate lowers your noise level for each track. Useful for audio engineering and mastering. And even then well recorded 16bit files would still be fine with noise levels unlikely to be an issue.
For sampling rate, there is no need to go higher than 44.1/48kHz according to the Nyquist theorem.
SteakTree t1_itw9fgd wrote
Sure hd600 will sound more closed in when listening to regular stereo music. Play back binaural or use spatial audio, and then there frequency response curve is almost perfect allowing for spherical soundstage reproduction
SteakTree t1_je0737m wrote
Reply to Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Definitely not at present. Right now the AI we have are just tools. They aren’t self directing. There is huge gap between a LLM and AGI. If we get to the point where AGI can self direct itself and explore its universe around it, running a megacorp for humans may not be top of the list. There would be so much significant change that it would be hard to say the corporate model would even remain valid.