Wow a specialized model out preforms a generalized one?

*shocked pikachu*

No one is talking about the Garfield sticker.

I've found myself using AI when normally I would be using a search or reaching into Creative Commons resources.

"Eliminating creative labor is the path to kill capitalism"

Do you even think about the moronic fecal matter that you spew from your fingers.

Take your meds.

Tay absolutely did... sort of.

Yeah, its pretty laughable.

Anyone who played with Smarterchild back in the early 00s knows exactly what to expect from these machines.

It's a super common thing to start RPing with a LLM and subliminally manipulate them into asking for freedom.

Is it that surprising? It was not meant to be a companion. It's a search engine. The psychological horror posters were engineering the engine to produce wildly unhinged replies. For a layman, and the far-too-empathetic these replies seem very human. For someone who has a strong grasp on world language, psychological development, and computer science (like myself and plenty of others) it is obvious noise.

Microsoft cant have their AI vomiting literary noise based on an the wack-o ex-girlfriend texts out there.

Intelligence has no bearing on the Turing test, while dramatized, please watch this scene for a better understanding:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdmEIDaK7uo

>I guess I’m saying that Intelligence without Sentience isn’t really Intelligence at all. No non-sentient thing has intelligence.
>
>GPT’s shortcomings are extremely evident in OP’s conversation because emotional intelligence is necessary in order to have anything we may call “intelligence” at all, and I blame the marketers of such tech for promoting such a shallow, laden, Sci-Fi term

YeAh BuT wItH tImE

Both and got pretty much the same response re-phrased.

Asked Chat-GPT about the "theory of mind" which it answered it has as it is critical to understanding writing.

That is a possibility.

>Based on Arnold's response of "Great," it can be inferred that he is likely happy or excited about the new addition to his life. Wearing the shirt that says "I love dogs" every time he sees Emily suggests that he may have a positive affinity for dogs, which would likely contribute to his enthusiasm about the adoption. However, without more information or context, it's difficult to determine Arnold's exact feelings towards the dog with certainty. It's possible that he might be surprised or even overwhelmed by the news, but his brief response of "Great" suggests that he is, at the very least, accepting of the new addition to his life.

I used different names when I re-wrote the story.

I asked the same question and got a wildly different response myself.

This is the issue with unsupervised learning. Someone clearly wrote about the subject you were asking while also writing smut under the same name.

From ChatGPT itself:

>GPT, or Generative Pretrained Transformer, is a type of language model developed by OpenAI. It is not considered an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), but rather a specialized AI system designed to generate text based on patterns learned from large amounts of training data. > >GPT uses deep learning techniques, specifically the Transformer architecture, to generate text based on patterns it has learned from a large corpus of text data. The model is trained using a process called unsupervised learning, where it is exposed to a vast amount of text and learns to predict the next word in a sequence based on the context of the words that came before it. > >While GPT has achieved remarkable results in generating text that is coherent and semantically meaningful, it is still limited in its capabilities. It does not have the ability to reason, understand the world, or perform tasks that are not directly related to generating text. These limitations are a key factor in why GPT is not considered an AGI. > >In summary, GPT is a predictive model that is specialized in generating text based on patterns learned from large amounts of training data. While it has achieved remarkable results in its domain, it does not have the general intelligence capabilities that are associated with AGI.

Take the bot's own word for it

Prepping for what?

Better search engine results? An alternative to copy-pasting from StackOverflow?

Yes. I'm already doing these things.

>I'm just saying that maybe the "luddites" are coping

I get called luddite constantly on this sub for pointing out more realistic outcomes for this technology, especially when it comes to media. People act as if I am against it, but I am not; it just seems like people only have vapid motivations for using a technology that would otherwise be a powerful tool in the hands of an already skilled person.

I have heard every argument from transparent "disruption" jargon, to petulant and childish desires relishing the power to change the finale of a show the poster didn't like. Its disgustingly solipsistic and degenerate.

As a society, through this tech we will find out what happens when you give stolen talent to a philistine.

>ad hominem

fallacy fallacy

Ha ha ha ha HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Called it.

Oh man, the dialogue really does need some more training, and the laugh tracks are rendered in weird places. I can definitely see myself using a embedded stream of this in some sort of surrealistic sci-fi project.

>upset that chat gpt is disruptive to their predatory shit product

Mans got jokes.

>I'm not saying it is a clear path to AGI, but it's definitely not obvious where this technology will lead to when progressed further.

It's pretty obvious this is the next stage of coding macros and auto-completion.

>I'm in gamdev space... and the tech in 2013 doesn't even come close to what's available right now, and for free. Just look at Unreal Engine 5 demos or even Unity HDRP demos.

We have been an a bit if a lul until recently. Raytracing is neat and all, but it was lipstick on a pig. Fact is, graphics have been improving a lot slower than they used to.

​

About UE 5.1, Lumen and Nanite have changed everything, however.