bruh

haters gona hate. I thouught my experiment was cool af

Your argument gives me hope, but does the occurrence of an extremely implausible event necessarily place any witnesses in a stupor where they can’t reasonably be expected to do anything? I feel like the unexpectedness of an event doesn’t negate my ability to act justly in real time- no matter what I had foreseen while creating the monster

Right, but would the “reasonable person” defense still hold up once it is clear that the monster is conscious (regardless of what was expected of its moral temperament before it was alive), as it was when I turned my back on it?

Even then, aren’t zombies basically a virus? How can we even assign morality to that

I mean, neither, it literally doesnt know a thing when I created it

How would “virtually no efforts” hold up in court? Nobody knows that I was glad the monster was out of my sight 😈😈

Agreed- He developed a conscience by observing the family even if he didn’t have one when I made him.

Would your prosecution not be defendable in the same way that Oppenheimer was not guilty for Truman’s decision to drop the bomb?

That’s true. Even though he acts like a completely new person I could argue that I didn’t create his brain - Is a doctor responsible for the crimes that a patient performs post-resuscitation?

It’s given

Thing is, I didn’t treat my monster like crap, society does. The only thing you could argue I did do is let him escape to society in a vulnerable state

fr

we assigned ‘expert’ roles like psychologist and biologist. im probably going to bribe the psychologist

In the book, I was overwhelmed by the physical and mental exertion of my experiment so I took a nap. Just as a pregnant woman is probably not able-bodied as soon as she gives birth, would it also be negligence on her part if she fell asleep while her baby escaped?