Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Picture-unrelated OP t1_jdu62x2 wrote

Curious if he’s opening up the source code to get some free labor. Since he fired anyone who knows how to do anything lol

111

008Zulu t1_jdu7a8m wrote

How many hidden comments are there from the programmers lamenting about Musk's takeover?

172

musluvowls t1_jdu7p5f wrote

Today I logged on to Twitter and I saw two Tweets from fucking Catturd and a bunch from Andrew Tate. Do I follow them? FUCK NO. Elon is a fascist prick, and I hope it all burns to the ground.

797

TechFiend72 t1_jdubt86 wrote

it wanted to be free.

Seriously though, twitter can burn. There is not a way in the US to handle free speech without allowing hate speech. That should be fixed first. It won't be because the politicians use hate speech.

41

cunt_isnt_sexist t1_jdud0ay wrote

1000111001001 = it's fucking shit.

There, we solved the riddle.

5

musluvowls t1_jdug2my wrote

1
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2
: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality

Choose your poison. Either way, Elon fits it.

48

musluvowls t1_jdugfmf wrote

I didn't say he banned me, I said he subjected me to FUCKING CATTURD and ANDREW FUCKING TATE. Both are disgusting individuals I want nothing to do with and never followed, but yet, I have to deal with both on my Twitter feed all the fucking time. Here's an expert explaining: “Elon Musk sent up the Bat Signal to every kind of racist, misogynist, and homophobe that Twitter was open for business,” said Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate. COVID-19 and other domestic and foreign disinformation and QAnon conspiracy posts are surging.

42

Vecna_Is_My_Co-Pilot t1_jdugjgv wrote

You should know that Musk calls himself a Free Speech absolutist. So he has absolute freedom to deliver you any speech he desires. Clearly he wants to locate the leaker of this source code so he can congratulate them on exercising their absolute right to free speech as well. Don't you too want to have absolute speech? It's free!

247

musluvowls t1_jdugt7i wrote

Catturd and Andrew Tate are vile, beyond saving. Tate will likely never get out Romanian prison for sex trafficking, and most people are pretty sure Catturd is a vile pedophile from Florida (just Google it). No one wants to see or hear from those disgusting losers. So yes, if he is forcing them onto our timelines, he is a maladaptive fascist.

43

musluvowls t1_jduifzz wrote

The fuck it hasn't. He puts vile shit on all our timelines all the time in his lame attempt at trolling. I've been on Twitter since 2009 and the place went to shit under Elon. Elon is a fucking idiot who allowed his goddamn OBSESSION with trolling libs to cost him AT LEAST $30 BILLION. If you don't think that fucking moron is amplifying fascist morons like CATTURD then you are as idiotic as he is. Just to test things out, I just did a fresh login to Twitter and you know who I got? Kimberly Fucking Guilfoyle. GROSS DUDE. Who would ever follow that disgusting person?

67

Dommccabe t1_jduj3qm wrote

Do you think he would share the calculations he made to come up with such a number? Or the 250 billion he's come up with projecting 12 months of growth?

I have better chance if winning the lottery jackpot!!

109

OnDrugsTonight t1_jduriqn wrote

That's really blatantly untrue. Ever since Musk has taken over, right wing accounts get promoted to my timeline at an absurd rate, to the point that they sometimes make up 50% of the timeline. The only interaction I have with them is clicking the "mute" button, and yet they come. Either they are all specifically paying for the privilege of being displayed to me, or the algorithm has developed an insane bias in that direction.

28

snakebit1995 t1_jdurz9z wrote

Surely this won’t cause problems for all the people that lost their 2FA cause they refused to pay money for it

13

Mine-Shaft-Gap t1_jdusfj7 wrote

Again, "go out and touch grass". Is something people say when they have nothing valuable to add, but want to get the last word in. You have no argument. Weak attempts at chirping is all you have.

8

sofaslippers t1_jduv11w wrote

Nah bullshit. I created a new Twitter account only for the purpose of following 2 people that have no relation to politics. Twitter now shows me tons of right wing propagandists. That’s basically the only thing I would see, even after I continuously note that I’m not interested in tweets like that. Off your knees.

19

Mr_Piddles t1_jdv00p7 wrote

Social Media is like a garden, it needs constant pruning. Block shit you don’t want to see on sight, and the algorithms will 1) get the message and 2) you’ll stop seeing the same arguments popping up every other day.

36

didimao0072000 t1_jdv0pg2 wrote

Unless you work in a high security field using air gapped systems, code leakage is pretty much impossible to prevent.

−27

BarCompetitive7220 t1_jdv2yt1 wrote

NYT reported that the code was leaked about 2 months ago. The Chief Twit is an expert coder ( so says he). Apparently not.

52

arvigeus t1_jdv5xqv wrote

Probably not a lot. He fired most of his engineers. The skeleton crew remaining simply cannot produce enough "F U Elon" comments to match the rest of "F U Dorsey" ones.

86

phluidity t1_jdv91qw wrote

> So he has absolute freedom to deliver you any speech he desires.

I mean, from a legal and even somewhat moral point, he does. He owns the platform and has the right (especially now that it is private) to use it to spew his nonsense. What he doesn't have is the right to make me read it. I am perfectly free to walk away and let the man baby rant to his sycophants. Musk has never understood that the users aren't the customers, they are the product, and this product doesn't need him.

42

Mr_Piddles t1_jdvas7f wrote

Facebook sucks in general, IMO. I found that unless you're following interesting people, and you like your family (and they don't just rage and aggrieve post), its a really garbage platform. It's best use is as a calendar.

17

ClassicCodes t1_jdvhlzb wrote

Social media in general sucks. It's full of people with attention-seeking problems, scammers, or groups trying to indoctrinate you for political or commercial purposes. Social media platforms exist primarily to steal and sell your personal information to advertisers since that is their only real revenue stream. You aren't the customer, you are the product being sold to advertisers and big data companies.

10

dnvrwlf t1_jdvhp6g wrote

Who actually cares about Twitter at this point?

Anyone?

−1

Golf_Alpha_Yankee t1_jdvju7a wrote

Its gonna suck for a lot of smaller content creators and small business people who rely on it for advertisement, pr coverage and social engagement but if they didn't see the writing on the wall already and found different options that's basically their own fault

11

bloodylip t1_jdvnsg6 wrote

In theory that's how it works. But it doesn't take into account that the platforms can and do push shit that pays for it. I try to keep my instagram pruned but for some reason, it continually pushes right wing accounts into my discovery tab, regardless of how many I block and mark as "not interested." I don't even interact with any political posts but it still pushes that shit at me.

14

Tkain61 t1_jdvo10r wrote

Oh, that's why they're making it open-source.

0

Burnbrook t1_jdvs55b wrote

I imagine the source code for a glorified blog site isn't all that complicated.

10

Anon_throwawayacc20 t1_jdvtsxy wrote

>Today I logged on to Twitter and I saw two Tweets from fucking Catturd and a bunch from Andrew Tate. Do I follow them? FUCK NO. Elon is a fascist prick, and I hope it all burns to the ground.

Social Media websites use tracking cookies to analyze and match your trends.

Considering so much of your post history on reddit involves politics, are you absolutely sure that you aren't triggering Twitter's algorithms? Are you sure you are not looking at posts involving politics, or watching youtubers involving politics? Eg. Watching drama youtubers who cover figures like Tate and do "takedown" videos on them? Likewise, are you engaging with users who follow or mention Tate? Because that could be why you are seeing it.

Please answer the question. I am not asking in bad faith, I am not concern trolling, I'm not saying this to contribute to the "culture war". It's not a defense of Elon either. No, this isn't to "poison the well", nor' am I "making the dreamworks face", as some youtubers would put it. (However it is annoying I must clarify all those points.)

I'm simply asking this as a legitimate question about how the algorithm works? Is the reason you are seeing Tate not because you keep engaging with that kind of content?

Are other users here having this same issue, even those who do not engage with political content?

5

mlc885 t1_jdvu0lq wrote

I want it even though it is not useful to me

3

supercyberlurker t1_jdvyr2u wrote

That's my take, here. Is Twitter doing anything interesting algorithmically, do they have some secret sauce approach, some special technology that lets Twitter do its thing?

Not really. It's just a pub-sub model at scale.

12

dnvrwlf t1_jdw37ob wrote

It is a basic question, so I'm not being anything but inquisitive about why anyone cares about it after that dude bought it, and it became less useful and enjoyable, in my opinion.

I didn't even know people treat it as linked in, which I also don't use.

Have a great day!

9

jates55 t1_jdwdxw6 wrote

We will show you the code, so you can tell us for free, what to fix.

3

supercyberlurker t1_jdwe1hp wrote

You have a point that the configs for their infrastructure would kind of be more interesting than their actual source code.

From a coding perspective it tends to become less interesting. Programming for scale is mostly about making simple composable services you can ramp up or down as needed.

4

NatashaBadenov t1_jdwge98 wrote

Twitter was invaluable for quick organizing (IMO that’s the reason it was destroyed) and the American holiday tweets are something I will sorely miss. However, I never made any real human connections there, and like you, my anxiety was through the roof. I cut the cord, so to speak, months before Mersk even floated the idea. I am a much more relaxed person now.

7

JohnTM3 t1_jdwgn0y wrote

Check out my new website "tweeter" where everyone who posts are "twits".

2

HeBoughtALot t1_jdx75wp wrote

I have been telling Twitter, for years, that i don’t want to see content related to politics. I have “I’m not interested…” trending topics and suggested Tweets to no end. It used to work. Ever since Space Karen took over Twitter i get served so much bottom of the barrel political garbage, its clear to see that user pruning has been disabled.

4

strugglz t1_jdx84xz wrote

Like source code from non-public servers or source code like pressing F12?

1

Deceptiveideas t1_jdx9eh9 wrote

Iirc it was revealed that Elon was upset his tweets weren’t showing on feeds anymore (due to high # of blocks and unfollows) that he forced the engineers to change the algorithm.

This means controversial accounts with high block counts are no longer being hidden by the algorithm and possibly even boosted.

5

Mr_Piddles t1_jdxbgsn wrote

I’m not saying that they’re wrong, but it hasn’t noticeably happened to me. Except for when Elon force unblocked people. But then I went and blocked him again, and it stuck this time.

0

arcticblue t1_jdxndqi wrote

It's even worse now with how aggressively they shove garbage "reels" in your face. All the reels I've seen have been incredibly stupid clickbait or just some dumbass video of a pretty girl staring in to the camera or taking her underwear off under a long shirt. I have yet to see a reel that is actually entertaining or funny and it's become so annoying that I rarely even log on to Facebook any more.

Also, I aggressively clicked the "Don't show me this page" link on every single "Suggested post" a couple years ago while also browsing in a container tab in Firefox. Evidently if you deprive Facebook of enough metrics to collect on you, you run the risk of getting banned without warning for "not being your authentic self". They demanded a government ID from me, then ignored me. It took me almost 6 months to get my account back. If it weren't for the fact that I had some baby pics of my kids uploaded there with no other backup, I would have just left it banned.

3

Mr_Piddles t1_jdy6a5i wrote

Everyone is saying this, but I haven’t experienced it. Maybe y’all just really love fighting and ranting about politics and don’t want to see any dissenting opinions, whereas I don’t want any of that, so I block it all.

2

[deleted] t1_je17w7e wrote

It connected me to a lot of people and a lot of opportunities in the early days. I don’t think I’m overstating it to say that a large chunk of my success can be traced back to using Twitter effectively back in 2008-2012. However, it recently occurred to me that it’s given me nothing but downside and stress since 2015 or so. I nuked my account a few months back and I’m shocked how little I miss it.

1

Aazadan t1_je28s1t wrote

Blocking counts as engagement on every platform, even spam mail counts unsubscribing as being worth the same as reading it.

The only impactful way to block is client side, so that it looks to the server like you’re not engaging at all. Anything you do that tells them to not send you data generates value for them.

1