Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

MysteryNeighbor t1_iye0nuh wrote

Aside from obvious economic disparity shit, there are plenty of Latinos out here who are of the mind that “that shit is just a cold lmao” so I’m most definitely not surprised

102

[deleted] t1_iye2w1u wrote

[removed]

5

ineededanameagain t1_iye8l2t wrote

Latino here, can confirm. Most of the older Latinos I know didn’t believe in covid until they got sick, over year into it. They’re also super religious so it tracks lol

12

Daddy_Macron t1_iye9r4d wrote

And yet, as a group, Latinos have a much higher vaccination rate than White and Black folks in the city. The data points to them taking prevention and mitigation more seriously than most other people.

https://www.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data-vaccines.page

6

sutisuc t1_iyebi18 wrote

How do they even break out Latinos as a group given that there’s plenty of black and white Latinos?

7

Disco_Dreamz t1_iyecxzc wrote

Latino refers to being of Latin American heritage, not skin color

11

[deleted] t1_iyea7v3 wrote

[deleted]

−5

themood3 t1_iyeblm4 wrote

Latinos overwhelmingly do not like the term. Not your place to police people on that. Folks has always been a gender neutral term, not really sure what’s the point of using folks vs folx other then for aesthetic reasons.

13

[deleted] t1_iyebujg wrote

[deleted]

0

MLao_ t1_iyeczut wrote

>man

Wait, you were being SERIOUS??

2

drpvn t1_iyegcyy wrote

So embarrassing! I will delete my comments.

−1

drpvn t1_iydqced wrote

> New data from the city health department points to disparities in race and gender

> Women were 1.4 times more likely to report symptoms than men

I don’t remember public health officials whining about “disparities in gender” when it came to deaths from Covid. Or life expectancy for that matter.

What this most likely means is that men are less likely to report symptoms, not that they’re less likely to have symptoms. That’s the disparity. Just like men are less likely to report symptoms of depression while women are vastly more likely to be prescribed SSRIs.

42

Curiosities t1_iyerwaj wrote

There were definitely reports of disparities in gender from the early days of the pandemic and up through now. Several different concerns throughout.

But even in this article, they point out that women are more likely to have autoimmune diseases and be responsible for more household work, reducing available rest time. This isn't necessarily women just underreporting a few symptoms, because the rates of autoimmunity, for instance may be a little off but it's like 75% women / 25% men, give or take, generally speaking.

As a Latina with an autoimmune disease and who is on an immune suppressant, there are reasons why I'm still masking constantly in public and taking other precautions to avoid infection. I fear Long Covid making me more disabled.

19

drpvn t1_iyesjyr wrote

There were reports noting the disparity but I recall no serious concern from medical officials about the causes of the disparity or how they needed to be reduced.

Women are more likely to do work in the home. Ok. Are men more likely to have jobs? (Yes.) And would that mean they have less rest time? (Also yes.)

It seems highly likely to me that men are just underreporting their “long Covid” symptoms.

−6

mrdnp123 t1_iye8ct8 wrote

The media love to misuse stats and data. They’re pros at it

12

FleetwoodMacNCheese t1_iyenvqu wrote

yep, they are expert marketers.

you may have data that doesn't bode well for a bottom line but if you can tell a story with that data and frame it in a certain light then you can completely change perception of that very same data

whenever I look at a report/article with data, I generally like to jump into the data first to interpret before I read the narrative. my takeaways are sometimes drastically different. but pulling up alternative sources reporting on the same data is helpful to figure out what is what.

5

iStealyournewspapers t1_iyeo6ip wrote

I’ll never forget making a wrong turn on my way back into the city and ending up driving through the bronx for a while when Covid was in full swing. Almost no one was masked and people were having big gatherings in parks. Just seemed like it wasn’t gonna go well.

22

Jeff-Van-Gundy t1_iyf5iz7 wrote

It was def a problem but as someone who worked in Harlem, Queens and The Bronx every day during the pandemic, midtown/downtown was WAY worse with people disregarding masks at the height of the pandemic. Although, funniest thing I saw was 3 people sharing a hookah at like 830 AM on the block in the Bronx...like why the fuck are you up that early to smoke hookah?

10

iStealyournewspapers t1_iyfbn3q wrote

Ah haha! Gotta get that morning buzz I guess. Shame about midtown too. I really didn't get out much then and was further uptown so I never saw that area.

1

chargeorge t1_iyesw53 wrote

Our doors unmasked and our door gatherings have never been unsafe.

1

iStealyournewspapers t1_iyew3f1 wrote

If you're outdoors hugging each other, touching each other in any way, having a bbq where infected folks are touching their faces/nose/eyes and then stuff that other people then touch, well then it's not exactly safe, is it?

6

GlitteringHighway t1_iye8tmc wrote

When you look at air quality in low income neighborhoods it makes sense.

17

BIGTIMElesbo t1_iyefm7w wrote

Just an aside regarding long covid. I had been experiencing the classic symptoms of long covid over the last two months. Extreme exhaustion, brain fog, loss of appetite, mismatched smells and fighting to stay hydrated. I receive IV ketamine treatments about once a quarter for depression and went last week. The following day all of my long symptoms started going away. Aside from a few smell related glitches, I’m a week out now and feel back to normal.

8

Moby-Wan-Kenobi t1_iyevulb wrote

as a latino, we have enough to deal with, we don't have time for these 'viruses' and 'global pandemics' of yours.....por dios

2

bsanchey t1_iydplel wrote

Not surprising. Like we really need to stop being surprised when vulnerable communities suffer bad things. That’s the intention in this city.

1

[deleted] t1_iydrxau wrote

[removed]

−8

bsanchey t1_iydsqup wrote

Love how you jump to conclusions about race when I said vulnerable communities. The Bronx is the poorest borough and Latinos work a lot of front line jobs that put them more at risk But yeah show your stupidity keyboard warrior.

2

drpvn t1_iydtffu wrote

You also said the city intends to make vulnerable communities suffer bad things. How so?

3

bsanchey t1_iye03zc wrote

Look at how the city shares resources. Take as old as time. Just look at schools. The richest neighborhoods in Manhattan have the best stuff for their students. Schools in the Bronx have to layoff teachers.

Lower east side gets a new park. Lots of parks in poorer areas can’t get new paint.

City needs to cut services the poorest areas get the first cuts.

New housing get to be built in better areas and more homeless shelters for the poorest areas.

Bike lanes for good areas. Highest asthma rates for the Bronx

If you live in NYCHA they can’t even be bothered to fix your heat or elevator.

How resources are spent show who gets taken care off and who gets forgotten.

0

drpvn t1_iye1whf wrote

The schools with the neediest students get the most resources, I know that much. I don’t know much about the others.

5

bsanchey t1_iye8zns wrote

A recent report came out the NYCHA replaced only 2 elevators out of all their properties. The elevators have been issues since Bloomberg. And since a federal monitor and all that they have only replaced 2.

People just accept that governments cant fix anything when the truth is they can move heaven and earth to address whatever they want.

0

princessnegrita t1_iye107m wrote

I refuse to believe that you have no idea what environmental racism is.

−2

occasional_cynic t1_iye51fl wrote

> environmental racism

LOL this website is a caricature of itself.

5

drpvn t1_iye8b5o wrote

Mods are searching your comment history.

1

occasional_cynic t1_iyeasou wrote

Yeah, already had my comment deleted for "Covid denial." If some blue/pink hair wants to ban me so be it.

2

princessnegrita t1_iye5m1c wrote

Is this website a caricature of itself or are you just ignorant and triggered by the word racism?

Edit: what you doing here New Hampshire?

0

drpvn t1_iye1k9s wrote

Is that what OP was talking about?

2

princessnegrita t1_iye6mo2 wrote

Look up what environmental racism is if you aren’t familiar and come back and tell me if you think that’s what they’re talking about.

−2

drpvn t1_iye71n1 wrote

Wasn’t clear from his initial comment. His follow up comment seems to be talking about that. But then again I didn’t think “environmental racism” involved intentionality—his comment was that the city has intentionally tried to make poor people suffer these harms.

1

princessnegrita t1_iyeb0e3 wrote

The intentional part is the literal decades of de facto and de jure racism. The environmental repercussions are a side effect.

−1

drpvn t1_iyebj0w wrote

Yeah that’s not how I read his initial comment, which was saying that the city intends to harm these communities.

1

princessnegrita t1_iyedxqc wrote

The OP said that having vulnerable groups suffer the most in events like this is the intention of the city.

Another way to say it would be: the fact that the most vulnerable groups have worse cases of COVID isn’t a bug, it’s a feature of a system built on inequality.

1

drpvn t1_iyeft3r wrote

Right. He said that the city intends to have vulnerable groups suffer the most. That’s what I said.

1

kiki778668574757 t1_iye0cte wrote

Trust me I belive im one of them I have stuffy know mucus spit its disgusting

−2

MonteXristo t1_iyektps wrote

Yuck! Stay in bed, have some nice soup, put on a good movie and stay warm. Don’t worry too much though, the variant is pretty much just a cold at this point. kisses forehead and tucks into bed

1