Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

nolandeluca OP t1_j25j4e2 wrote

It's about damn time, the parking situation has been horrible for tradespeople the last few years. My restaurant customers constantly whine about the garage parking fee I charge when they have one of these in front of their restaurant...

−45

LFKhael t1_j25k1i3 wrote

Any time something flammable gets banned from a certain spot, it's because that kills people in some form or another.

A lot of these things have wood or plastic roofing, and their ceilings are low.

41

PhillyPanda t1_j25meww wrote

Sounds like only 22 are scrambling , the rest didn’t care to apply

43

CerealJello t1_j25p2v1 wrote

It can happen if we promote policy changes that make it harder to own a car that's rarely used.

-City wide street sweeping.

-Much higher registration fees for multiple cars owned at one property.

Edit: I'll add in adding many more short term loading zones so delivery drivers don't need to block crosswalks or double park.

21

nolandeluca OP t1_j25pqp3 wrote

When I lived in strawberry mansion they implemented street cleaning, it definitely removed a lot of abandoned cars from the streets, but the rarely used ones just accepted and paid the ticket, good money booster but not a fix to the actual problem of not having a very walkable city (Septa is great but not very time efficient)

3

StevenFromPhilly t1_j25r6lu wrote

Yeah its past time to knock down those bullshit huts.
Be open or don't.

26

ult420 t1_j25vjwy wrote

Genuine question- don’t tradespeople need cars the most to transport their tools and stuff? I agree we should lessen cars in the city but people hauling wood and heavy pieces of metal probably need their own vehicles way more than say a white collar worker

5

DonQOnIce t1_j25xks2 wrote

Weren’t these requirements announced several months ago? If they’re scrambling, they could have started on it earlier.

43

barchueetadonai t1_j26j7m4 wrote

The moment indoor dining resumed, it was still way too dangerous for many people to actually eat inside. Then also, there’s the obvious fact that the restaurant is also artificially heated unless perpetually in direct, daylight sunshine (impossible outside of the arctic circle last time I checked).

−4

Indiana_Jawnz t1_j26mznl wrote

These things shouldn't be taking up the sidewalk and making them impassable to pedestrians but honestly I don't care if they take up some parking or if they close off restaurant heavy side streets and put them there, like they did on Sansom by 15th.

And I say this as a tradesmen who has to park his 2500HD truck in CC.

96

Crackorjackzors t1_j26n59h wrote

My unpopular opinion is that I didn't like these streeteries anyway.

20

kellyoohh t1_j26okep wrote

None of these outdoor seating areas have enough airflow in the winter to make a discernible difference in virus transmission from indoor dining. They are closed on 3 sides (sometimes 4) and heated. It’s basically like eating indoors from a viral transmission standpoint. And worse in some cases as you’re in smaller quarters.

13

Hipsterskumm t1_j26sqzs wrote

Why do you want to eat as a SEPTA bus or my diesel dump truck rumbles by? Do you like a tinge of exhaust with your risotto? Maybe some antifreeze to go with your antipasto

7

joshjosh111 t1_j26y2yf wrote

I know a restaurant owner in Philly. He said that the regulations would be impossible to comply with right now, because there are so many requirements and he can't afford to meet them all within the deadline. He is working slowly on getting his streeterie setup, but for the next 6 months - 1 year, he won't be able to have one.

We might see streeteries dissappear suddenly, then come back as the restaurateurs get set up.

16

SnooOwls7978 t1_j26yfz3 wrote

I hate having to awkwardly walk through Parc's bustling streetery all the time to get to my work. Either that or cross the street, when it's faster to use the walkway they are taking up. I don't blame the servers at all but they are ALWAYS moving across or down the middle of the sidewalk because of the way it's set up. I feel really bad that they have to work like that.

36

AnarKitty-Esq t1_j277x7m wrote

They're using public space for free and creating a huge nuisance for pedestrians at places like Parc. I have no sympathy if they don't want/can't afford to meet regulations.

I'm totally cool with having some made permanent if they're placed on the street in former parking space and made safer (had a car bump into one outside a bar while trying to park), but they should not take sidewalk space.

2

mynameisntjeffrey t1_j279mik wrote

Honesty I’d rather see these way more than I’d like to see someone’s parked car, but when they’re in the corner of the street and it’s hard to look around it while biking or driving then I don’t care for it.

6

Alright_Smartphone t1_j27jhz8 wrote

For real, I can think of a dozen at least that are ramshackle, pieces of shit that could collapse or catch fire at any moment and have always been a safety hazard.

All those well designed, well-built, actual effort put in, sure, I think they should be given some leeway to become compliant. But a bunch of shit like I see in the South Street/Queens Village area... Christ they look like a toddler built them.

17

unsolvedneedtoknow t1_j29l69p wrote

I never have or will eat in one of these streeteries located on parking spaces. My immediate thought when they first started popping up was that someone would crash into them and knowing it has happened several times They should also not be impeding people from using the sidewalks- I often wonder about how folks in wheelchairs manage as it is when many parts of the city have tiny sidewalks in bad condition.

2

dirtymatt t1_j29ttys wrote

Parc has been in violation of the existing sidewalk rules forever. They’re required to keep the greater of half the width of the sidewalk, or 6 feet completely clear for pedestrian traffic. They don’t come close to leaving that much space open.

6