GarlVinland4Astrea
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_jdxil9o wrote
Reply to comment by KeyLimeGuy69 in Why have dramas like Breaking Bad and the Sopranos remained relevant while others such as Lost and Dexter remained in the 2000s? by LakeMcKesson
People need to get over that none of the showrunners thought Dexter deserved anything approaching an ending that didn't give him back his karma.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_jaezgk0 wrote
Reply to comment by TapedeckNinja in Amazon Studios Boss Jennifer Salke Unfazed by Warner Bros. New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movies: ‘We Have Enough Fan Love to Sustain’ by Neo2199
^you get it.
Other dude doesn’t
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_jaeo1dk wrote
Reply to comment by LeeF1179 in Amazon Studios Boss Jennifer Salke Unfazed by Warner Bros. New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movies: ‘We Have Enough Fan Love to Sustain’ by Neo2199
Does it matter what people on the internet talk about if the numbers are there? I remember over a decade of "Avatar is irrelevant and nobody cares or talks about" ad nauseam online. It was to the point where people tricked themselves into thinking the sequel would be a major dud. Yet today it's sequel is the third highest grossing film of all time.
I think people really need to start to understand that the majority of the world aren't the sub culture of people that like to discuss shows and television online and the mega hits pull from people that simply watch things they like a time or two and then move on and don't get in the media frenzy about it.
Honestly some of the shows and movies that get the most talked about on reddit, aren't really the most popular shows. Andor was literally known for being one of the worst performers of the Disney Star Wars lineup on Disney Plus for instance despite multiple posts a day about it. This sub always had a hard on for shows like Santa Clarita Diet despite that not being well known to mainstream people.
At the end of the day, it either gets eyeballs and retains them or it doesn't.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_jaemt9d wrote
Reply to comment by archlector in Amazon Studios Boss Jennifer Salke Unfazed by Warner Bros. New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movies: ‘We Have Enough Fan Love to Sustain’ by Neo2199
It's Amazon. They have the money. People really don't understand that there is a WORLD of difference in how wealthy Amazon is vs something like Netflix or HBO/WB.
If Bezos really wants the show to run, it will. It's basically just being used as a motor for the streaming service. Which is just a motor for the rest of Prime.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_jaaqu8u wrote
Reply to Is the Rocky/Creed series the longest running sequentially released franchise with no reboots? by [deleted]
James Bond went 20 films before a reboot. Rocky/Creed has 9. And technically Creed could be viewed as a spinoff.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_ja4as0b wrote
Reply to comment by ClipClipClip99 in Do I just give up on game of thrones? (SPOILERS) by THIS_DICK_IN_UR_FACE
Also Books 4 and 5 are quality dip from the previous 3.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_ja4a9dv wrote
Reply to comment by preppytarg in Do I just give up on game of thrones? (SPOILERS) by THIS_DICK_IN_UR_FACE
Honestly it's only a good place to stop because it ends on a high note.
But I think people forget, it's basically all set up for things people have been excited about. You aren't going to watch the season 6 finale and want to stop because it teases
- >!Jon Snow as King of the North!<
- >!The reveal that Jon is actually the son of Lyanna and Rheagar and has an Iron Throne Claim and the consequences of that!<
- >!Dany finally coming to Westeros to start a conquest!<
- >!Cersei ascending to the Iron Throne to be positioned as the the final obstacle for it. !<
So it has it's own pros and cons. Imo the OP is spot on. People remember season 6 as good because they remember the last two episodes and forget that the rest of it was mediocre season 5 quality. And even then one of the episodes is basically set up for the disappointing next two seasons.
I think people just can't accept that GoT was pretty poor for like half it's run and a lot of the final season issues were a result of mistakes made years before. People just thought the payoff would correct it or something
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9yjrbe wrote
Reply to comment by preppytarg in Apple takes another step towards ads on TV Plus by Mandelmus100
This. There's basically Netflix which is consistently profitable and everything else is either in the red or might have a year where they barely are profitable before going back under. It's a total money suck because most of these came late to the party and have to compete with all the other people entering an over saturated market.
Right now I think the big ones are just waiting for the rest to give up and die off.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9tmwbc wrote
Reply to comment by tetsuo9000 in Warner Bros. Discovery Sees $2.1 Billion Loss in Q4 After Big Writedown; Ad Sales Tumble by Neo2199
Killed WCW too
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9tmuq0 wrote
Reply to comment by vitorgrs in Warner Bros. Discovery Sees $2.1 Billion Loss in Q4 After Big Writedown; Ad Sales Tumble by Neo2199
What you are missing that others are pointing out is that WB was in such bad shape that it didn't matter if Discovery was involved.
- If it stays with AT&T it's such a big loss that they start similar cutdowns.
- If they find a non Discovery buyer, AT&T are folding debt into the sale and the buyer would assume that and still have to make cut downs.
There was no third option where WB doesn't have significant debt and doesn't need a massive overhaul. As others have said, companies that could have taken on the debt, didn't want it. It was just mismanaged for years. When everybody loved HBO Max, they were basically burning money as fast as they could and everyone knew it.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9tmff3 wrote
Reply to comment by SeanOuttaCompton in Warner Bros. Discovery Sees $2.1 Billion Loss in Q4 After Big Writedown; Ad Sales Tumble by Neo2199
Netflix is profitable. Everyone else is wondering how much money they can justify throwing into a black hole and hoping other streamers die off to give them a boost. Netflix doesn't need that
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9tivs7 wrote
Reply to comment by LlewelynMoss1 in ‘IT’ Prequel Series ‘Welcome To Derry’ Greenlit At HBO Max by DemiFiendRSA
That has far less to do with Muschietti and more to do with how they split the material imo. The adult portion in the novels is meant to be mixed in and be complimented by the child person. It doesn't stand as well on it's own because it was never meant to.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9tiowq wrote
Reply to comment by Drkarcher22 in ‘IT’ Prequel Series ‘Welcome To Derry’ Greenlit At HBO Max by DemiFiendRSA
Yup the whole thing about Pennywise is that he's essentially an eldritch horror from beyond who is designed to destroy worlds that got lazy as shit and decided to shirk his duties by making a corporeal form and just setting up shop in a small town and feasting on it's children every few decades.
As bad as Derry was, the rest of the universe kinda got good deal with IT deciding to confine itself to Derry until the Losers wiped IT out.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9ti9to wrote
Reply to comment by Carpenter_v_Walrus in ‘IT’ Prequel Series ‘Welcome To Derry’ Greenlit At HBO Max by DemiFiendRSA
King has also alluded to the idea that Pennywise or maybe one of his spawn is still alive. Tommyknockers has a scene where they drive through Derry and in one of the storm drains they see silver eyes. Which in the books are how Pennywise eyes are predominately described. Then in Dreamcatcher there is a scene where they are in Derry and there is a memorial commemorating the Losers Club that has "Pennywise Lives" spraypainted on it.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9thvmn wrote
Reply to comment by Gymrat777 in ‘IT’ Prequel Series ‘Welcome To Derry’ Greenlit At HBO Max by DemiFiendRSA
Actually it's not. The turtle dies in IT. It's heavily implied that there is another force beyond the turtle (the creator) and IT (the destroyer) who is guiding the kids.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j9q3jnf wrote
Reply to comment by Redeem123 in ‘IT’ Prequel Series ‘Welcome To Derry’ Greenlit At HBO Max by DemiFiendRSA
It’s a prequel to all the other times IT attacked Derry. In the books they have a periodic interludes to prior attacks in its 27 year cycle
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j92kivk wrote
Reply to comment by mapletree23 in Vince McMahon Wants $9 Billion for His WWE Wrestling Media Empire by Sisiwakanamaru
It’s actually worth dramatically more now than it was in the Attitude Era. WWE has a global reach now that it didn’t have back then and has diversified a lot. Metrics like ratings are down, but WWE as a company is much stronger
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j92kbzi wrote
Reply to comment by osmlol in Vince McMahon Wants $9 Billion for His WWE Wrestling Media Empire by Sisiwakanamaru
In America. Japanese and Mexican wrestling are huge
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j922bhb wrote
Same reason Fox News gets good ratings. The right is pretty much condensed on Fox so everyone who leans that way and wants to watch that stuff goes there. Meanwhile everyone else is split between Kimmel/Colbert/Fallon.
That's pretty much been the bread and butter of that model. Create a monopoly on mainstream conservative media, be the only show in town, and then position yourselves as the alternative.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j6peqng wrote
Reply to comment by TootieSummers in What was better at their peak: Thursday Nights on NBC or Sunday Nights on HBO? by Skipper_Eyechild
This. There was a period where NBC had Friends, Scrubs, Will & Grace and ER. Or you could swap out Scrubs for Frasier. Or go back to when they had Mad About You, Friends, Seinfeld and ER.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j6o2gqs wrote
Reply to comment by Greedy-Creme-995 in DC TV Slate Unveiled: Creature Commandos, Waller, Lanterns, Paradise Lost, and Booster Gold Shows Announced by MarvelsGrantMan136
What? Almost none of this has been done before
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j6a2dq1 wrote
Reply to I think Velma was written badly on purpose. by 2Bit_Dev
Jesus Christ
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j66v3yf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ABC News Breaks Up With Amy Robach, T.J. Holmes Over Off-Camera Affair by Jeffmister
If it becomes a scandal that distracts from the company mission, then no they can't.
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_j66etz7 wrote
Reply to comment by im_a_dick_head in ABC News Breaks Up With Amy Robach, T.J. Holmes Over Off-Camera Affair by Jeffmister
Because it became a public scandal, it was awkward for audiences watching the show after it came out, and ultimately they got replaced and the show didn't miss a beat because Robach and Holmes aren't stars.
So it was just easier to throw the problem away and run their show like normal.
It's not the fairest thing, but in the entertainment business your value and star power and how much your employer will put up with are on the same line and they just weren't that important to ABC for the unwanted attention it was getting
GarlVinland4Astrea t1_jegzt1n wrote
Reply to comment by punchinglines in Trevor Noah becomes first comedian in nearly 60 years to win Erasmus Prize by punchinglines
Disliking an entertainment act because you think they are bad at their core competency is weird to you?
Is it weird when you dislike a band you think sucks?