Utoko

Utoko t1_jee5qgq wrote

Completely wrong. ChatGpt is really excellent in many languages. I use it often in German.

and here the people from ukraine which I showed it also using it quite a bit.

It is another super useful tool which lets you use your own language.

​

I would say all these tools do the opposite. The family in our house can still very little German after one year. They are now all using speech translate on their phones, which also gets better and better with AI. whisper model and co.

If you are never forced to learn the other language most people won't do it.

I think in the long run it is pretty bad for integration in the country in the long run. Since you can communicate slowly via phone but that is no fun when it is not necessary. So you just have less contact.

1

Utoko t1_ja36wqp wrote

Even if you can push out Russia that doesn't end the war. It will be just like Palestine but with a lot and real rockets.

Just Russia terrorizing Ukraine with rockets across the borders.

All the sanctions have way less effect than the west would like. The exports were down 18.9% in 2022 but that is only if you look at the full year. In the end of the year exports were only down 10.6% YoY. So Russia replaced already 80% of the exports to the EU with exports to other countries.

The GDP went only down by 2.2%.

Ukraine will also not lose they are getting more than enough fresh supply from the west to sustain.

So this defeat you are talking about will take 10 years +. If no one is interested in peace talks which might be the case.

−9

Utoko t1_j97767s wrote

hm they probably expected the non-profit "Open"AI not completely switch around stop publishing papers and becoming a for profit company. (Usually in the past that isn't the norm or the purpose of a nonprofit)

We had a couple of years were the cooperations somehow realized that sharing their research advanced progress a lot faster. OpenAI will get the companies back to protectionism.

20

Utoko t1_j8x123v wrote

but your suggestions to split it up in multiple graphs is far worse or only show data from 2017 and 2018.

Than everyone would wonder how ho wit developed after 2018.

You can make the same claims about every stock market chart which is displayed in log scale. "These movements don't matter because 96% of the growth was in the past."

but the recent development is very important too. In this case that it still continues to go.

It is still down 35% in the last year, which lets you see we are not even close to the end of the read.

One might argue the 98.92% decrease says a lot less because when something is not done in scale it is always at first extreme expensive. So I don't agree that they make it look less impressive than it is.

So as long as your point is people don't understand how to read log charts I still disagree with you.

3

Utoko t1_j6kqsem wrote

I don't have time is such a boring excuse for everything.

We all have things to do and only 24h. If you have the option to nap 30 min when you are tired to be refreshes after it is worth it.

If you are more productive you don't have to be as busy.

Somehow people never say they have no time for things they find important. They only can't find the time for things they don't value enough.

6

Utoko t1_j29g1ba wrote

>expectation of a completely frictionless existence, an unwillingness to work with life's "imperfections",

Billionaires didn't get there without frictions, they are ruthless and powerful. Not without reason they are usually very narcissistic. They have ambitions, determination and using their resources.

Maybe you are thinking about the children and not people who control global companies. You think Elon musk doesn't face friction and backlash?

5

Utoko t1_j29abaq wrote

That is exactly the field where machine learning shines when you have too many variables to account for every small one everywhere.

and we have already very good data as input for it.

Weatherforcast has a giant network of clean data which was just waiting to be used.

For FSD training for example it is different they are slowly building good data.

60

Utoko t1_j26gb5n wrote

Right now the claim is that the current algorithms carry us way further.

The limiting factor is indeed computing power and good data. The last shift is that you need to grow the labeling of good tokens(desired outcomes) with the data.

There is also a lot of work done on chips, which are only used to train AI models and good data is created on mass. It is all coming together fast because there are also using models for data cleanup labeling.

Of course it is always possible that we hit a wall with the current algorithms soon but it looks very promising.
and the knowledge is walled off. The general principles of how OpenAI and Google archived their level are out there. So we have many companies driving us forward.

2

Utoko t1_j1pqvlh wrote

>"O you who have believed, indeed, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone alters [to other than Allah], and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it that you may be successful." - Surah Al-Ma'idah, Verse 90

They are just like people in other religions to ignore what you don't like. To be fair I like people who adapt their religion are better than people, who try to stick to it word for word.

Also in my personal student life I also knew a lot of Muslims who would drink on parties, but I would never drink at home.

3

Utoko t1_j0lgsqj wrote

The technology is certainly now capable of it. Scaling all the Projects, getting all the contracts in order and stuff like that is the only challenge.

Google search alone mas $148.9 B. Just have to take 1% of that and ofc the models can do so much more than just letting users search and placing some ads.

might be a conservative estimation but we will see.

38

Utoko t1_iz4gw29 wrote

I tried that one and my answer seems good

>It is not possible for a rock, or any physical object, to lift its own shadow. Shadows are simply the absence of light, and as such, they cannot be lifted or moved by any physical means. The size of a rock has no bearing on its ability to lift its shadow, as a shadow is not a tangible object that can be lifted in the first place.

1

Utoko t1_iz1jv70 wrote

The singularity is a hypothetical future point in time when technological advancement will accelerate at such a rate that humanity will be irreversibly transformed. This is often thought to be driven by the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies.

At the singularity, it is believed that AI will become capable of self-improvement, leading to an exponential increase in its capabilities and intelligence. This could enable AI to solve some of the most complex and difficult problems facing humanity, such as curing diseases, developing new technologies, and exploring the universe.

2

Utoko t1_ivyfki6 wrote

They are talking about the company valuation FTX, which went to 0$. If a company has way more debt than assets 0$ is also not a good deal. The company needs $8 billion as liquidity to start up again.

The company token is FTT which went from 78$ at the peak to now 3$.

6