itsgreater9000

itsgreater9000 t1_jdyiggn wrote

right. i'm talking, some low level government official that handles building permits getting handed a bag of money with a big $ symbol on it while a corporate exec twirls his mustache type of corruption

1

itsgreater9000 t1_jdye8y2 wrote

oh, i absolutely agree. i just think in this case it's not explicitly malice, although i could be convinced otherwise. i DO think that the way tech companies are run are somewhere between stupid and malicious, still not sure on which side of the line they're on yet. but i doubt there's any corruption happening at a large scale.

1

itsgreater9000 t1_jdwoy55 wrote

i don't think this is shady necessarily, just really, really miscalculated. i feel like the MO of tech companies is to dump a bunch of cash on some moonshot thing, find out a year or two in it probably wasn't worth it, and then just cut it/leave it in disrepair. thats the feeling im getting from this situation.

2

itsgreater9000 t1_jdwnnvt wrote

my parents used to take me to brandeis for a smaller scale theater, i actually thought it was kind of cool despite not having a lot of interest in it. i have no idea if they still do those shows/they're open to the public since covid though. i do remember tickets were wicked cheap, but this is a while ago. i think for 4 people it was like 35 bucks? maybe a bit more or a bit less.

1

itsgreater9000 t1_jchi2ng wrote

The only addition is a new Korean Egg Sandwich restaurant named OH K DOG that is originally from TX, but has moved into the northeast. I think I saw one of their places when I was in Flushing recently.

Anyway, It's directly on your left as you enter, exactly opposite of the Tous Les Jours (which is on the right of the entrance).

I had the egg sandwich. It's good, but it's not totally worth the price IMO. It's a lot of cholesterol for like $9 - $12 depending on what you get. I am hoping that if egg prices come down a bit, their prices do too. It was definitely enjoyable though, if I'm wicked hungry and doing some shopping there again I may get some again.

Can't speak to the Korean style corn dogs that they have, I'm not a fan of them in general.

I think they opened about 4 weeks ago IIRC, maybe 3.

2

itsgreater9000 t1_j7xkc5l wrote

firstly, she should try both, see what she prefers. i take the T into boston for work and from the edge of 95 (waltham), it's about 30-40 minutes, depending on the commuter rail being... you know, american infrastructure-y.

really, just check the commuter rail schedule, it's the "ideal" version, but shows you the length of time it should roughly take: https://www.mbta.com/schedules/commuter-rail

also make sure you choose the time when checking google maps for driving - it defaults to current conditions, but modifying it to rush hour times will show you, it's a way worse drive...

also we could really help a lot better if you would let us know the commuter rail stop and the orange line stop she needs to get off at.

13

itsgreater9000 t1_j2v3xvr wrote

while I understand the situation, I wouldn't apply it to every school district equally. But that, to me, sounds like a reasonable argument for delaying the start time and ending the day a bit later. I am mostly thinking of schools like Hampshire Regional, which have 5 towns that flow into one school and they are definitely far apart. I think there might be a compromise that could be had about minimizing bus travel time for school kids (or better yet, get some friggin train system out there that might be a good way to help speed up the transit! think about it: public train systems for bringing kids to school :D). That might be redirecting towns to larger/closer places (e.g. instead of Southampton kids being brought to Hampshire Regional in Westhampton, send them to Westfield or Northampton, whichever is closer, and set up the regional high school in Chesterfield). Although the reality is that when everyone is so spaced out, the minimum travel distance is going to hurt somebody somewhere. But the current school systems are mostly local towns just saying "hey, let's merge together!" without real thought about what the best regional merges would be. Just what local towns feel like at some point in time.

That being said, eastern mass has some of this too (sadly). The METCO program requires most of the kids being taken from Boston to the outer suburbs to get a 5:30am start, which was terrible for those kids. I honestly felt bad because they were definitely trying to stay awake, but just couldn't some days.

2

itsgreater9000 t1_izu4xj4 wrote

> I think you mean calculated, but that depends on each race -- the higher the vote count the less likely it is. e.g., an election between 20,500 people being decided by one vote is much less likely than an election between 20 or 200.

This is true, but I think the probability increases are not as stark as we see a higher partisan split among a population of voters. For example, sure, there's a 1% probability that you get a vote total like 51-49, but take into account that the town is evenly split and that there's only really 20 votes that can go one way or the other, and now the probability is now at 5%. I'm not trying to say there isn't electoral fuckery, but I think considering the sample size is so small it's hard to draw conclusions at this point in time. (yes, the sample size of elections is not in and of itself small, but given how elections work these days the actual sample size i think is quite small to draw any specific conclusions from it)

3

itsgreater9000 t1_ir57ybl wrote

the best compliment i've heard about the northeast was from Andrew Callaghan (of All Gas No Brakes/Channel 5 fame), who described the northeast as just way too boring to generate a ton of interesting content from. very glad we are not like FL/TX in that way, haha.

20