thegoldengoober
thegoldengoober t1_jcl955u wrote
Reply to comment by SnipingNinja in Those who know... by Destiny_Knight
That's exactly what i mean though. I've been able to use Bing Chat for week, and now GPT-4 by itself for days and I know it's performance. And it's crazy good. We're multiple releases into GPT LLMs. We have open source models. All these have been extensively used and explored by people. We can't say the same for anything Google has developed.
thegoldengoober t1_jcjoau6 wrote
Reply to comment by foxgoesowo in Those who know... by Destiny_Knight
I would love to not underestimate them. I assumed Google was way ahead of the game compared to everybody else. But Microsoft and Open AI keep showing off more and more impressive shit and applying it in actually practical ways, and Google hasn't shown anything comparable in that regard. Afaik, at least.
thegoldengoober t1_jagsdll wrote
Reply to comment by SvetlanaButosky in The imperfect translation between thoughts and language by LifeOfAPancake
You're being down voted because you mentioned Elon Musk I'm sure, but brain computer interfacing will surely revolutionize communication.
thegoldengoober t1_j9mw2v2 wrote
Reply to comment by diviludicrum in Stephen Wolfram on Chat GPT by cancolak
People like to reduce consciousness down to only the easy problems, and even the hard question of why these processes manifest as subjective qualitative experience at all.
thegoldengoober t1_j9mgxml wrote
LET ME IN!!!!
thegoldengoober t1_j9ebvq9 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
I expect that when super intelligence happens we won't know it until it's been controlling us for years.
thegoldengoober t1_j98xcda wrote
Reply to MIT researchers makes self-drive car AI significantly more accurate: “Liquid” neural nets, based on a worm’s nervous system, can transform their underlying algorithms on the fly, giving them unprecedented speed and adaptability by lughnasadh
This sounds like the kind of thing required to make an AI system truly general. Right now, as I understand it, no matter how capable we build a system its capabilities remain rigid. I imagine something more plastic could be immensely more capable.
thegoldengoober t1_j4ndj7j wrote
Reply to comment by vernes1978 in Researchers develop an artificial neuron closely mimicking the characteristics of a biological neuron by MichaelTen
That's because it sounds like they're full of shit.
thegoldengoober t1_j4n29q8 wrote
Reply to comment by Shelfrock77 in Researchers develop an artificial neuron closely mimicking the characteristics of a biological neuron by MichaelTen
What do you mean by "transmit memory*
thegoldengoober t1_iyegjtu wrote
Reply to comment by Shiyayori in What’s gonna happen to the subreddit after the singularity? by Particular_Leader_16
It's not just going to be obsolete, it's going to be totally irrelevant.
thegoldengoober t1_iy4hzyg wrote
Reply to Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Because the problems are hard. When we first were getting the advanced VR setups we were getting in 2014 the tech was living its best life piggybacking off of smart phone R&D.
These days XR has its own problems that need to be solved that are mostly unique to it, and that lack of intersecting with other industries is going to make it take longer.
That's why Meta is needing to invest so hard into it, to solve these problems, and so there's an XR market to sustain funding to those solutions.
Tested was able to see behind the scenes at Meta's reality lab to see demonstrations of the kind of things I'm talking about https://youtu.be/x6AOwDttBsc
thegoldengoober t1_ivdfnbb wrote
Reply to comment by Carl_The_Sagan in Nick Bostrom on the ethics of Digital Minds: "With recent advances in AI... it is remarkable how neglected this issue still is" by Smoke-away
Yeeeeeppp. If digital minds are gonna want to be taken seriously... Well, lets just hope they take more inspiration from I-Robot than they do Terminator.
thegoldengoober t1_ivcuvj3 wrote
Reply to Nick Bostrom on the ethics of Digital Minds: "With recent advances in AI... it is remarkable how neglected this issue still is" by Smoke-away
We can't even be ethical to non-digital minds. There's a hell of a lot more talk about it for sure, but talk is a lot different than action. If history serves digital minds are going to be hella abused regardless. Not that it's any reason not to engage in the dialogue, but it does leave me feeling pessimistic.
thegoldengoober t1_iu3sqso wrote
Reply to comment by innovate_rye in Teen Glues Hand To Historic Computer to Protest A.I. Takeover [satire] by canadian-weed
You can tell by the mutant finger
thegoldengoober t1_itorjum wrote
Reply to comment by ActuaryGlittering16 in Is anything better than FTL as a future? by ribblle
Yeah, I don't see why not. Unless they don't see the reason. Maybe it's better for them to just turn the matter to computonium. Maybe their simulations are so close to reality that they figure any reason to search the universe might as well be done in their simulations where they have god-like powers to explore beyond what they could outside of them. Or maybe none of this is related at all. It's fun to speculate though. At the very least it's fun sci-fi.
thegoldengoober t1_itoek1d wrote
Reply to comment by grossexistence in Is anything better than FTL as a future? by ribblle
That's actually a theory as to why we don't see the universe teeming with advanced life. That any species that becomes advanced enough to do it is also advanced enough to immerse themselves in simulated realities, and therefore never have reason to keep expanding.
thegoldengoober t1_is4ciox wrote
Reply to comment by UnionMountain4680t in A new genre of video game is on the horizon. by Particular_Leader_16
Apparently researchers are already able to produce psychedelic like trips with the VR HMDs we already have. Which is wild.
thegoldengoober t1_jclb6kj wrote
Reply to comment by SnipingNinja in Those who know... by Destiny_Knight
I initially took Google at face value and believed they were apprehensive about releasing due to bad actors. I thought Google was way ahead of everyone, and that all it was gonna take would be for them to apply their systems to products to match the competition. But now we've seen that competition, and we've only seen claims from Google.
I mean obviously they have work done. Impressive work based on demonstrations and papers. But even knowing that it still feels like somewhere along the line they got complacent and fell behind what we're seeing now, and this behavior is them trying to stall and catch back up.
Which is not what I expected for the time that competition finally forced their hand as far as AI is concerned.