Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

lufecaep t1_jdsajet wrote

So make your sandwich first. I brought several PB&Js through several countries not to long ago. The only people that seemed concerned with them was the group that is concerned with restricted foods. I actually had to pull them out of my bag and show them at a couple places.

15

DanFuckingSchneider t1_jdscicj wrote

A bomb is only the second worst thing you can put in a jar of peanut butter in public.

28

HarlanCulpepper t1_jdsd4rd wrote

I just want to know who just can't bear to travel without peanut butter.

52

machina99 t1_jdsd97u wrote

But what about if I want some peanut butter to dip my apple slices? And even on a sandwich that raises the question - what if I have more than 3.4 oz on a single sandwich? I'm team amorphous solid when it comes to PB

8

Bobodahobo010101 t1_jdsdraq wrote

I wouldn't call it a gas or necessarily a solid, so maybe i agree with them.

5

MoistAttitude t1_jdsfbgb wrote

Pitch is a liquid, and peanut butter is much less viscous than that so sure.

8

Ahab_Ali t1_jdsgbvo wrote

I run marathons and always pack peanut butter so I do not have to worry about finding some at my destination. It is part of a traditional race day breakfast.

The TSA had been restricting peanut butter container size for quite a while--I guess it was just unofficially until now.

Edit: I package it in multiple 2oz condiment "to go" containers.

24

nuadusp t1_jdsjkp3 wrote

why just not allow oils and emulsions

1

patienceisfun2018 t1_jdsldx9 wrote

I have stringent dietary restrictions and peanut butter is one of my favorite travel foods. Obviously, there are always alternatives, but classifying it as a liquid is stupid and another example of the security theater bullshit they put us through.

52

Scutshakes t1_jdt0zb4 wrote

There is a YouTube channel called "What's My Line?", it is a channel that archives and uploads episodes of the old panel show of the same name. The famous John Charles Daly hosts this game show where a celebrity panel interrogates the subject on what their profession is, kind of like a game of 20 questions. Sometimes they blindfold themselves to bring in guest celebrities (like Jack Benny and Groucho Marx) and they have to guess who they are talking to.

My memory is a little hazy as this has been some years, but I believe one person had worked as like a mustard taste tester, or worked in a mustard factory, or was an officiant for mustard marriages. I don't remember. But when the panel asked "Is what you [work with] a liquid or a solid?", the subject looked confused. The famous John Charles Daly, in all his grace, wisdom, and good nature, took the subject in for a private deliberation, and very confidently announced that the mustard was a SOLID OBJECT, which of course derailed the entire subsequent line of questioning to an inevitable failure.

For as much as I respect and love the famous John Charles Daly, I will never forgive him for this, and I've never watched another episode since. Peanut butter, a liquid? Maybe. I admit I am not smart enough to argue for or against this. There are better qualified people for it. But MUSTARD? That I have to shake up and squeeze out of a bottle? That I can easily spread over my bologna sandwich in the back of a limousine? I will never agree to call it a solid. Maybe you do, maybe you will side with the famous John Charles Daly purely on the trust he has built with you. But he's not fooling me, and I'm not afraid to look dumb enough to argue against him.

2

VanDenBroeck t1_jdt2ddj wrote

“The agency says peanut butter fits its definition of liquid, which it declares as something with no definite shape that takes the shape of its container.”

That could also define a gas.

But my question is why does peanut butter take the shape of the jar? Is it because it is forced to under pressure during the manufacturing process?

If I scoop out a large portion with a tablespoon, does it fill the spoon like a liquid and the excess run out?

If I scoop out a bunch of it and dump it in a measuring cup, does it uniformly fill the cup by seeking a level like water would?

The TSA is a ridiculous bunch of nitwits.

135

shannyleigh87 t1_jdt2t81 wrote

My 3 year old legitimately refused to eat anything that isn’t snack food, except for peanut butter. He went on a two day eating strike over a green bean. I don’t want to deal with that when I’m traveling, I’d rather just bring the peanut butter.

7

SmurfsNeverDie t1_jdt49o5 wrote

They are probably talking about kirkland peanut butter.

3

grudginglyadmitted t1_jdt6e5j wrote

my sister has tons of food allergies and just recently had to beg TSA to let her keep her jar of jam (that plus some bread was her only meal for the 14+ hour travel day). If you guys end up on a flight together I bet you can make a great pb and j

29

Sharing_Violation t1_jdt8ejt wrote

I was on a flight once where they announced at the gate that someone on the flight was deadly allergic to peanuts and they would confiscate all peanut butter and related to make sure it was sealed... the amount of protest...

Me, I'm sitting there like... who is bringing peanutbutter on planes??...

So maybe it's common?

6

Wooba99 t1_jdt8etd wrote

It's so silly. Several years ago I was flying to Canada via London. I had half a jar of nutella in my bag. No issues for the first flight, but it was taken from me in London. I was transiting and hadn't even left the terminal!

1

Reyemreden t1_jdtch15 wrote

We already have peanut butter in a tube, I guess they could make travel sizes too.

1

Christovir t1_jdtdiyu wrote

TSA has been enforcing this for 10+ years when they made me throw out my peanut butter. They also took my “gel” insoles.

1

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdtg9ie wrote

Former screener here: peanut butter is approximately the same density as C4 when viewed on TSA’s X-ray screens. It sets off a false alarm on the automated bomb detection software, and the X-ray can’t see through it. You can hide whatever you want inside a peanut butter jar and it will be hidden from the X-ray operator (within certain size limitations).

They didn’t ban it for no reason.

179

valomorn t1_jdtjnc9 wrote

I'm gonna be the annoying "AAActually" guy here and point out that the term liquid can include many substances that are far more viscous than even peanut butter, to the point of appearing solid.

There's a whole ongoing experiment where a form of naturally occuring asphalt has been left to drip, it has only done so 9 times since 1930 and is for this reason still considered a liquid despite seeming so solid at room temp it can be shattered with a forceful enough blow.

7

HorseGestapo t1_jdtm3y0 wrote

Oh you're one of those...

If you refuse to check a bag I don't think you have much ground to complain about what you're allowed to carry on, especially when it isn't an immediate necessity.

−25

St3phiroth t1_jdtoslm wrote

I almost always pack peanut butter, PBJ sandwich, or nuts for plane trips. It's a really great, shelf-stable source of protein and fats which makes it a really great travel food when you can't bring a cooler/ice pack.

Obviously I would keep it sealed if someone on the plane was allergic though. I'm not an AH.

14

herronasaurus_rex t1_jdtx0qo wrote

I’ve had this same issue but with toothpaste - a paste is not a liquid!

1

RotisserieChicken007 t1_jdu19fz wrote

if they really wanted to ban it they should just have done so without giving a silly reason like it's a liquid.

1

SlackerKey t1_jdu3vzp wrote

I would invite TSA to drink a pint of peanut butter, then.

1

SilasX t1_jdu47u8 wrote

If they comment on the Frosty from Wendy’s … God help them.

1

harpejjist t1_jdu695g wrote

Peanut butter can stand in a lump. So not enough of a liquid. But also, I dare them to try and drink it

1

DuePomegranate t1_jdu7nwp wrote

The rule was always about liquids and gels. Or to be more anal,

>Any liquid, aerosol, gel, cream or paste

https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/liquids-rule

My understanding is that the "liquid" explosives that airlines are afraid of are often quite viscous and more like gels or putties (or peanut butter) than water.

The TSA media person is just doing a terrible job of explaining the rationale. They could just have said that peanut butter is a paste and that's restricted.

76

CavScout81 t1_jdudsi6 wrote

A few years ago the TSA stole my cheese spread because they said it was a liquid.

Fuck the TSA!

0

Ghosttalker96 t1_jdujr8h wrote

Aren't they now removing the liquid restrictions entirely as they create a lot of delays during safety checks and don't bring any benefit for security in the first place?

2

antiquemule t1_jduomrd wrote

Not very helpful. Most gels, pastes and other gloop are non-Newtonian and they do not all behave like peanut butter.

To be precise, it is a yield stress fluid, which means that when pushed a little bit, it acts like a solid, whereas when pushed a lot, it flows like a liquid. The (fuzzily defined) amount of push separating the two states is called the yield stress.

3

man-vs-spider t1_jdv0ekw wrote

Regardless of if it’s actually a “liquid”, it’s properties are those that security would be looking out for in explosives. So doesn’t sound too stupid to me (since we already have restrictions for liquids in general)

4

man-vs-spider t1_jdv11aa wrote

This is a pretty thin defence, pastes are typically liquids with solid suspensions and behave like liquids when large enough forces are applied.

You may disagree with the general TSA guidelines, but given that liquids are restricted, it is consistent that things similar to liquids are also restricted

1

VanDenBroeck t1_jdv25cs wrote

I have never carried a jar of peanut butter on a plane. I have however carried: bags of peanuts, peanut butter sandwiches, and peanut butter fudge. Now, peanut butter is in a state that is between peanuts and peanut butter fudge. So… it seems that this transitional phase of matter matters to the TSA. They are anti trans. /s

−1

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdv5gjd wrote

Hah! That’s hilariously amazing. New one to me. Edit: after some thought… one reason you can’t have water is because there are explosive components that look very similar to water. But they don’t freeze. So if your water is frozen then it can’t be a liquid component of an ied.

10

DeepTh0tt t1_jdv5gnk wrote

It's a paste. Unless you melt it, you can't pour it. You don't need to melt a liquid to pour it.

1

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdvchy5 wrote

No…. I’m saying That the laws of physics don’t allow us to distinguish between the two substances.
It’s like when men look at two things that appear to be the same shade of yellow, but really they are different shades of yellow. (Men are less able to discern differences between shades of yellow than 1/3rd of women who have more yellow cones in their eyes)

6

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdvfzxv wrote

I understand your point, but you’re grossly overstating it. Hijacking used to be commonplace in the 70s & 80s. Then 9/11 obviously happened and TSA was obviously created in reaction to that, so there are obviously reasons. Whether those reasons justify the existence of TSA is a different discussion tho

7

Sciguystfm t1_jdvouq7 wrote

I mean the reason was entirely security theater.

Locking, reinforced cabin doors and air marshals prevent another 9/11, banning toothpaste does not.

There's zero evidence the TSA has stopped a single terror attack, and on top of that they fail their own internal red team tests 95% of the time

0

--___- t1_jdvqjuk wrote

We travelled to Israel with jar of peanut butter in checked luggage. As it happened, the kids liked the food and we didn’t use it.

When at the airport for our return home, Israel security pulled our bag aside, rummaged through and asked us about the peanut butter. They let it go back in the bag.

2

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdvrxle wrote

They are the most expensive home security window sticker ever. While they haven’t actively prevented terrorist actions, their mere presence may have been sufficient to make terrorists seek softer targets. Unfortunately, that’s hardly something we can measure or quantify

5

mazzimar7 t1_jdw982f wrote

The have "paste" as a qualifier under the liquid category. Peanut butter is definitely a paste.

1

gtrocks555 t1_jdwli7f wrote

Got stopped for a card game in a box with “sharp edges” too. I didn’t even open it though, they just took it out, saw it was a card game and told me why it was flagged and let me be

18

Callinon t1_jdwo8zj wrote

Forgive me for saying so but it sounds like this machine isn't very reliable. If it's routinely mistaking cards for bombs and peanut butter for homemade explosives, that feels like a very high false positive rate to me.

Maybe instead of banning everything in sight, it'd be better to fix the machine?

16

ButtMustard t1_jdwoa49 wrote

Why are you bringing peanut butter on an airplane?

1

Mrsum10ne t1_jdwq61i wrote

Not to agree with or defend their assetry, but if I’m remembering correctly gases are fluids. They aren’t liquid though. All (most?) liquids are fluids, not all fluids are liquids. And maybe peanut butter is like pitch. It just takes forever for it to flow. If they would’ve called it a fluid they may be technically right.

1

burrito-disciple t1_jdwrrfk wrote

>You can hide whatever you want inside a peanut butter jar and it will be hidden from the X-ray operator

Can confirm, I used to live with a guy who smuggled drugs all over the country via US mail just by sticking things inside peanut butter jars.

Eventually got caught, but not because of how he shipped things.

3

Eruionmel t1_jdwuida wrote

>it'd be better to fix the machine?

Oh thank god, someone finally suggested it. We assume you have ideas on how better to literally see through solid objects? If you'll head right this way, our R&D team would love to get started on your plan...

−1

Ketheres t1_jdwujix wrote

>But they don’t freeze.

You can freeze all matter if you get it cold enough, and stuff that's liquid in room temperature usually doesn't need to be really cold to be frozen solid. Stuff that looks like water when liquid might not look like water ice when solid though.

2

DjuriWarface t1_jdwwv4b wrote

False positives are fine though. Mostly no harm done. False negatives are the concern. I realize the TSA is still not that effective but still.

Not being able to bring peanut butter through TSA is hardly going to affect anybody.

2

Sluggish0351 t1_jdwyyg2 wrote

This doesn't seem like a good excuse considering that there are devices that can sniff out C4, as it has a very distinct scent. There is literally no reason to believe that peanut butter is C4. If they actually cared about safety they would just invest in tools that identified actual threats instead of just making life harder for people traveling.

3

skittlebog t1_jdx097u wrote

Glad my peanut butter cups made it through.

1

tauntingbob t1_jdx3h36 wrote

The number of airplane hijackings was already in decline during the 90s and processes were already improving at airports around the world. Remembering that the TSA is a purely US production and doesn't represent the world, where most incidents happened. The world's airports have improved their processes and it's improved security a fair bit.

But ultimately the evidence is there, the TSA fails almost every test they're checked against by their own organisation. They're probably the least effective security force in the world, other than to frustrate people, they're good at that.

$8bn a year for an organisation who let through banned materials 70% of the time... https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellistalton/2019/01/28/is-the-tsa-really-necessary/

2

LuvCilantro t1_jdx60nq wrote

You could always put it in your checked suitcase. It is quite plausible that the number of people who MUST travel with a jar of peanut butter in their carry on is small enough to not warrant an exception.

2

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdxawhc wrote

Have you never shrink wrapped food before? It’s not all that complicated to package smelly materials so that they can’t be smelled. The X-ray is the device that can detect explosives almost perfectly

0

Harry_Gorilla t1_jdxboow wrote

Do your children only eat peanut butter with their fingers? Just make it into sandwiches, put it in crackers, dip the celery in it, or whatever it is you do with peanut butter BEFORE you pack it, and it will cruise through the xray

6

Sluggish0351 t1_jdxv1xz wrote

Lol I used to work with C4. I have used the tech I am talking about. It can sense the scent of C4 on a person's hands that have been washed numerous times. It can detect it through packaging. C4 literally comes in plastic wrapping and is detected through it.

2

XenoskarSIMP t1_je9pqvn wrote

Are this many mofos taking peanut butter on planes? Like, "Okay, all packed for the trip. I got my sunblock, extra socks, some magazines to read... and, uh, my Peanut butter."

1