Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Smaptey t1_iy1wf0a wrote

Not a big fan of the pink, but everything else looks pro

22

itdobutitdont t1_iy1xnwb wrote

Cooked to ooey gooey perfection. Well done!

1

crazyebb1313 t1_iy2fy0n wrote

I like the pink!!., pinker is better

1

One-Pride-4360 t1_iy2kvqe wrote

Is that minced beef? Bro you can’t leave that pink wtf

12

Excludos t1_iy2scmf wrote

Looks good, but that burger is slightly under cooked. As much as I like rare meat myself, you can't do that with mince (Unless you freshly minced it yourself. In which case, go ahead and eat that shit tartare if you want). Save the pink for your steaks

55

fenian_ghirl t1_iy2yxha wrote

You can't have minced beef pink unless you want to be really ill

−9

AnyLeave3611 t1_iy30pz6 wrote

No. Meat, like beef, has dangerous bacteria on its surface. Thats why eating raw beef is dangerous but eating rare beef is not.

When you grind meat, like when making a patty like in OP's pic, you essentially push those bacterias into the meat. At this point, just cooking the surface of the beef is no longer sufficient to safely consume it.

9

Excludos t1_iy30r6d wrote

Correct! The inside of a steak isn't where the bacteria lives, it's on the surface. Hence why a medium rare steak is fine, because the surface is cooked. When you mince it, the "surface" becomes mixed in everywhere. So it becomes unsafe to undercook it like a steak would be

The only way to serve rare/raw mince safely, is by removing the surface of a steak, and mincing it yourself. This is how tartare is made

39

dropfry t1_iy3135u wrote

It's because of surface area. Sliced steaks are cooked on both sides. Sterilizing the exposed sides. Grinding beef exposes it all the way through, but is only cooked on it's outsides. Leaving the insides vulnerable. So a pink steak is safer than a pink burger.

2

mileswilliams t1_iy324s5 wrote

So cheeseburger but you didn't have any buns?

−9

Excludos t1_iy34hmt wrote

You'll be ok 99/100 times indeed. But over the scale of an entire population, that's still a lot of unnecessary illnesses, some of which could be deadly. E. coli is still a thing that affects 265000 people in the US alone yearly, and kills 100

10

Mk1Racer25 t1_iy37fcq wrote

Pretty safe bet that if you eat contaminated meat, you're going to get sick, unless it's cooked to the point where it's unrecognizable / inedible, and even then it's still dicey.

Where are you from that you refer to ground meat as 'minced? They are two different prep techniques

−22

Excludos t1_iy37ov6 wrote

Not at all. Contaminations like e.coli are on the surface, as explained earlier. You can cook regular steaks rare, because the surface gets the temperature treatment required to make it safe

For the purposes of bacteria, ground and minced is the same; you mix the potentially contaminated surface of the meat in with the rest

10

dutchdaddy69 t1_iy3ayly wrote

God it is so wet and under cooked. No way this didn't make you sick.

11

Spartanias117 t1_iy3c1jd wrote

What is this seemingly recent trend of not fully cooking your ground meat? It's not a steak, people.

2

twodegreesfarenheit t1_iy3c4nx wrote

I can’t help but notice all the pink in the middle comments. So why when I go to a restaurant (Red Robin 2 weeks ago)do they ask me how I’d like my burger cooked???

25

Martin8412 t1_iy3cx88 wrote

And yet every non-chain restaurant here in Spain will ask you how you want your burger cooked. I've had tons of medium cooked burgers. It's delicious. Never once had a problem.

−9

Lonestar-Boogie t1_iy3el2n wrote

If the green things are pickles, this is a 10/10.

1

TikaPants t1_iy3fe0s wrote

There’s nothing wrong with your patty temp. Maybe post on r/burgers where less Rule Book Larry’s live?

4

MyFace_UrAss_LetsGo t1_iy3jzdi wrote

The restaurant I work at sells burgers medium by default. The patties aren’t freshly minced, either. Not saying it’s right or wrong but I’d expect someone to have gotten sick and complained in the three years I’ve worked there.

−2

thedastardlydave t1_iy3k7c6 wrote

The problematic bacteria that sometimes exist in beef products is typically only on the surface of the meat. This is why you can eat a steak rare (you kill the bacteria on the surfaces when you brown the steak).

If you buy ground meat, chances are that some of the bacteria from the surface of the meat is now mixed throughout the ground meat. This means that you have to cook it all the way through.

At a restaurant that is serving burgers that aren't cooked all the way through, they will (hopefully) have removed the outer surface of the meat before mincing the meat, which is why it is considered to be safe.

29

Ryangel0 t1_iy3m7i2 wrote

>For the purposes of bacteria, ground and minced is the same; you mix the potentially contaminated surface of the meat in with the rest

Missed that part of their response hey?

4

fugly_neighbour t1_iy3nmr6 wrote

Why are people hating on the pink centre? Since when is that a no-no?

4

TonydaTrippyHippy t1_iy3onr0 wrote

Pickles? Should be onions... that is a cheeseburger with bread. Peace.

−3

squishybloo t1_iy3oqav wrote

It's funny to me that so many people are like GUARANTEED E COLI BRO!!! NO WAY YOU DIDN'T GET SICK FROM THIS!!

Like, yeah it's riskier to eat. But 'riskier' doesn't mean 'guaranteed getting sick'. Some people are willing to roll the dice.

I'm 40 years old and I've yet to get sick from an undercooked burger.

11

fugly_neighbour t1_iy3pnlj wrote

Yeah for real, i was really surprised how many people were saying it’s undercooked. You can eat beef raw so why wouldn’t you keep a burger on the pink side for a juicier and better tasting patty 🤦🏻‍♂️

i mean here in Slovenia a good burger place will always serve a burger with a pink centre

5

nincesator124 t1_iy3qjp6 wrote

Since it's pink and is mashed up hamburger that is going to make you sick

−11

Drunkpanada t1_iy3r471 wrote

Steak is different from ground. Ground mixes the (possible) bacteria from the outside to the inside where it can proliferative. Steak keeps the bacteria on the outside, where it would be burned off/cooked keeping the raw inside uncontaminated

11

SweetChoadOfMine t1_iy3tagd wrote

If only there was another food-related sub where this travesty might belong … sfp or something.. ?

−4

johyongil t1_iy3tqx9 wrote

I think this is technically a chopped cheese sandwich.

−3

kyle9003 t1_iy3w4li wrote

pink burgers look sketchy

−3

pattyG80 t1_iy3w4nk wrote

One thing I noticed travelling to the US is restaurants ask you how you want your burger and my answer is always "fucking cooked". I don't get people that eat risky meat like this.

−5

skitty166 t1_iy3wdjc wrote

I'm guessing most of the commenters saying it's undercooked aren't in the US because that thing looks PERFECT to me. *chef kiss*

2

chipcity90 t1_iy3zb20 wrote

yikes not all food needs a cross section

−3

poppinfresco t1_iy4046n wrote

Oh it’s that what it is? Fun fact, ground beef is meat from a shitload of animals. Unlike a steak. Which is a single cut of meat from a single animal. It’s highly recommended to leave link in the middle of steaks. But unless I personally hand ground that beef, I would never touch that with pink in it. Two decades of working in a restaurant taught me to know better. I wasn’t sure what this was at all. Kinda surprised to learn it’s food

13

tysnaps t1_iy407q0 wrote

FFFFFFFFFFF 🥵 I NEEED THAT!

2

fenpark15 t1_iy40iqb wrote

While true, it requires proper food safety precautions and still bears e coli risk. With beef, the bacteria stay on the surface of the muscle. A steak that is seared outside and rare in the middle has still been sterilized by the searing. That aspect goes away with ground beef, where the former surfaces get all mixed in together. When eating a raw minced beef dish like carpaccio or tartare, the proper prep is to remove and discard the outer surface of the steak before mincing in a clean work area and serving immediately. So, in short, eating a medium hamburger patty holds a fair amount more e coli risk than a rare steak.

11

420fmx t1_iy44a4r wrote

Doesn’t look super appealing lol

−4

TogaPower t1_iy44faq wrote

No, you absolutely can do that with mince if you want to and the risk is pretty minimal all things considered. Countless people do it everyday without ever having an issue. Also, color isn’t a 1 to 1 relationship with safe temperature. People will often cook pork to shit just because they think it needs to look ghost white to be safe to eat.

6

Excludos t1_iy44m7j wrote

Countless people also get sick every day. In the US alone, 265000 people get infected with E.coli every year, and roughly 100 of them dies from it. Yes, you will be fine 99/100 times, but it's not a risk that is in any way shape or form worth it

0

420fmx t1_iy44we4 wrote

It’s not a recent trend, Americans love the shit . Germans eat raw mince but they either do it themselves or get good quality from a butcher .

Would never do it with super market mince

−2

TogaPower t1_iy45e8o wrote

Yeah you can. How likely do you exactly think you are to get sick from this? People severely overestimate the likelihood of illness from some medium rare/medium ground beef. Absolutely every restaurant will ask you how you want your burger cooked and this would quickly die out as a practice if it was making a substantial impact.

5

boots311 t1_iy45kkx wrote

I'm allergic to dairy but that looks great even to me!

3

TogaPower t1_iy45zyd wrote

Untrue. You absolutely can and the odds are overwhelmingly in your favor that you don’t get sick. “Riskier” =/= sure change of getting sick. You really should look up a thing called statistics

1

aSharkNamedHummus t1_iy468ss wrote

So they’re illegal in Canada, and they’re legal in the US, which supports their claim. I mean, I don’t see any results referencing illegality in other countries, but I have absolutely no clue how you’re inferring that it blew up in anyone’s face.

1

TogaPower t1_iy46bdn wrote

Have you bothered checking the math on your odds of dying if 100 people die against the number of burgers consumed a year? Better yet, check the math on how many of those 265,000 infections were caused by burgers, how many of those were definitely because the burger wasn’t cooked enough, and then take that number against the number of burgers consumed a year. You’re worrying over nothing dude. Not only are the odds of dying extremely low (and by that point we can get into other countless more dangerous things), but simply the odds of infection are ridiculously low

4

Smaptey t1_iy48qqw wrote

The entire thing looks professionally made. I'm not particularly a pink ground beef kind of guy. I didn't understand their question because I wasn't certain what confused them about what I said. I also assumed it was a loaded question so I wanted them to make it clear.

0

TogaPower t1_iy49wfz wrote

Ohhhh I forgot that if something is a law it must always be for a rational and perfectly good reason! Anyway, the risk is so ridiculously low of getting a serious illness from a non well done burger that I’ll gladly decide for myself lol

−3

bingobango415 t1_iy4b81t wrote

I’m surprised about all the pink nay sayers. I betcha that was delicious, albeit heavy in the tummy. I like my burgers medium/medium well. Never once got sick from a medium burger.

2

ABigAmount t1_iy4bxvy wrote

It's mostly that ground meat (of any kind) is all surface area and surface area is where the bacteria is. With a steak you can eat it rare/raw in the middle because the surface area is just the outside and it gets the heat which kills bacteria. With ground meat there is a fuck ton more surface area, all the way through the patty.

You're right if you grind your own stuff or eat at a place which does it right before cooking, you're much safer. It's not a guarantee though.

15

Excludos t1_iy4ccmr wrote

>Have you bothered checking the math on your odds of dying if 100 people die against the number of burgers consumed a year?

Dunno about you, but I'd worry about the odds of getting sick as well. 265000 a year is not an insignificant amount of number. Equally important, the reason the numbers are so low to begin with is precisely because of strict restaurant rules and population education. People know not to make a pink burger. If everyone made pink burgers and the numbers were still this low, you'd have a legit argument

​

>Better yet, check the math on how many of those 265,000 infections were caused by burgers, how many of those were definitely because the burger wasn’t cooked enough

100% of them, because e.coli dies with temperature. So all of those burgers were inadequately cooked. The only argument I'll give you is that some of the cases have been because of cross contamination with vegetables, which aren't all necessarily suppose to be cooked. But I'd still point you to my previous argument. Just because no people have died from a nuke in 2022 doesn't mean setting off nukes are fine. The numbers are low precisely because people don't generally eat pink-burgers

−6

jamesdfiek t1_iy4cl2s wrote

Looks good, everyone saying its too undercooked orders their steak well done.

1

accidentalquitter t1_iy4gt2k wrote

I understand why people are getting upset about over the pink, but if you couldn’t eat medium / pink center burgers, why would restaurants ask you what temperature you want it cooked?

2

Fortyouncestofreedom t1_iy4h29x wrote

Dude this looks awesome! I love patty melts. I think I gained 10 of my freshman 15 in college from party melts alone! My dorm had chefs that would cook them fresh everyday in our cafeteria. So delicious!

2

MuddiPutty t1_iy4h33e wrote

I’d like to place an order w/ fries.

2

shogun308 t1_iy4mzdb wrote

If that centre has been 65C or over for more than 2 minutes, it's considered safe in the UK. It is very unusual for beef mince to stay this colour in that scenario.

Burger meat cannot be "medium rare" because of the contact areas for bacteria, which in mince are ground through the entire patty. Steak can be, because there is no surface area within; only where the heat touches the exterior of the meat. (Which is very quickly made safe by a hot pan/grill).

If I was served a burger this colour in the center I would not eat it.

My head chef went to an upmarket restaurant and had a burger that came like this. Spent a week off work, uncertain which end to hang over the toilet bowl.

Source: spent 10 years in the restaurant/hotel trade, most as a sous chef and undertook a number of different food hygiene and safety courses.

7

gatorbeetle t1_iy4nelr wrote

DAMN, That looks NASTY...but in Such a GOOD Way!!!

2

nosdoogp t1_iy4ng6u wrote

When I worked at a restaurant (southern US) we weren’t allowed to sell burgers or hamburger steaks cooked less than Medium. So no medium rare even, but we would do blue rare steaks (sirloin, ribeye) at request.

1

Massey89 t1_iy4t6ya wrote

mmm raw ground beef

−2

BronchialChunk t1_iy5kv9k wrote

maybe more of an american thing but pretty much any place you go to that's making a burger to order will ask how you want it done. I think it's just more a reference to the fact that a steak would look like this at medium rare as opposed to any adherence to correct culinary terminology.

I used to have a buddy that was a bartender at a place and he knew my penchant for rare steaks and all that. I'd occasionally order burgers from there and they'd cook it to be a bit pink inside than they were supposed to and I never got sick from it.

2

deadly_toxin t1_iy63i8t wrote

I buy my meat a half cow at a time (myself and a friend split one), and you wouldn't believe the amount of ground beef that comes from one animal.

I get what you are getting at - that slaughter houses and butcher shops likely don't separate per animal. But most likely the ground beef you buy is from one maybe two different cows. Which isn't any different than when you buy four filet mignons - there's a chance they may each be from a different animal.

That's not why it's not recommended to eat pink though. When you cook a steak you are cooking the area that has been exposed to bacteria. You can't do that with ground beef because all of it has been exposed to bacteria.

1

dedicated-pedestrian t1_iy6as2a wrote

The main way you can keep beef pink through the cooking process is by inhibiting the Maillard reaction, which you can technically do through members of the allium family.

But kneading onion pieces into a burger produces a meatloaf, so... Yes, cook the burger.

2

dedicated-pedestrian t1_iy6cs4x wrote

After looking it up, beef/other meat mince can refer to meat that has been passed through a grinder.

This product is distinguished from ground meat in the same jurisdictions by the fact that mince cannot be comprised of anything other than the cut of meat that was put into the grinder. Ground meat, on the other hand, can have additional fat or ice/water added to adjust the texture.

(Naturally mince can still refer to very finely chopped meat as well, but in many places it refers to the unadulterated ground cuts.)

1

dedicated-pedestrian t1_iy6dho6 wrote

It's not that you can't eat them, statistically you're not ultra likely to get sick - but the chance is there, and no one can guess how sick you'd get.

They have small disclaimers at the bottom of their menus making it so you can't hold them responsible for your ordering undercooked meat or eggs.

The customer is always right in matters of taste, so restauranteurs just make sure the customer can't sue for any potential food poisoning they get.

1

dedicated-pedestrian t1_iy6ef21 wrote

Well, fresh ground/minced beef at least hasn't had time for that bacteria to multiply within the portion. The danger isn't from the bacteria itself, but from the byproducts of its continued presence and propagation.

There is, I suppose, the option of shaving off the edges of the cut of meat and grinding the interior for absolute maximum safety.

1

thereisgummies t1_iy6mg4n wrote

Dude you do know you're more likely to get e.coli from improperly washed veg, contact with a sick person, and contaminated water than beef right?

Like those 265,000 cases don't come exclusively from under cooked burgers, you know that right?

0

thereisgummies t1_iy7rkz0 wrote

Mmm no you didn't.

"Some from cross contaminated vegetables" vastly understate that the vast majority of that 265k isn't caused by under cooked burgers.

a. The veg isn't "cross contaminated" b. You're most likely to catch it from exposure to run off water or exposure to someone with e.coli as it is incredibly highly transmissable

>how many were caused by burgers

And I quote

>100% of them

0