Submitted by Substantial-Pass-992 t3_123deg3 in news
Comments
TechnicalSymbiote t1_jduchwl wrote
Natural gas
[deleted] t1_jdud04j wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdud805 wrote
[removed]
Apprehensive-Flow276 t1_jdudl5p wrote
Cacao if dehydrated, and condensed, has oils and carbon and theoretically could cause an explosion depending on how it was stored.
Silos explode sometimes
[deleted] t1_jdudn1v wrote
[removed]
5xad0w t1_jdudnrt wrote
Literally anything that creates fine dust when stored or processed such as flour, sugar, cocoa, etc.
[deleted] t1_jdudvw5 wrote
[removed]
lady_lowercase t1_jdufnqy wrote
combustible dust hazards.
here’s a video from the u.s. chemical safety board if you want to learn more: https://www.csb.gov/videos/combustible-dust-an-insidious-hazard/. this particular video goes over a sugar refinery explosion.
[deleted] t1_jdufxgx wrote
[removed]
asdaaaaaaaa t1_jdugbv0 wrote
Anything that gets turned into fine enough powder and gets dispersed will explode. Sugar, flower, sawdust, dust itself, etc. Most factories have stuff like that in them. Most oils and fats used in food production can be quite flammable as well. Really, heavy production just isn't the safest thing, but it's a great way for you to get chocolate bars or whatever else at an actually affordable price.
TheLaGrangianMethod t1_jduhd5f wrote
Flour explodes very easily and violently. Plenty of other stuff too. That's just ignoring something like natural gas or propane.
Heiferoni t1_jdukuig wrote
Yeah it's a common classroom physics demonstration to harmlessly combust a small amount of flour in a can. Great way to help in understanding silo explosions.
[deleted] t1_jdumkis wrote
[removed]
BabySnarkalaTurkey t1_jduog6y wrote
There is also a debate about the possibility of a gas leak from what I read earlier. The next building over in the factory complex had people who reported smelling gas all day, but the gas company claims that no report was made. The gas company did respond early in the resulting fire from the explosion to help shut off gas to the area to prevent further explosions. Time will tell what the cause was.
BlademasterFlash t1_jdutpqr wrote
Yeah a lot of people are talking about dust explosions (which is a possibility) but I’m thinking it’s more likely a boiler or something like that
[deleted] t1_jduuccg wrote
[removed]
persolb t1_jduvur6 wrote
Maybe just me, but it seems like the headline should include the words ‘bodies of’.
They are victims even if they were buried under the rubble with just a broken bone.
[deleted] t1_jduwars wrote
[removed]
iksbob t1_jduwlv8 wrote
The weather-cam footage looked a bit flamey. I don't think it was steam.
memberzs t1_jdux4nq wrote
organic powders like wheat dust, plastic dust, and sweeteners can all explode if blow into the air, even a static spark can ignite it. boilers that aren't maintained or malfunctioning, ammonia systems used for refrigeration and process chillers. the list is quite long for pretty much any manufacturing facility especially food manufacturing.
memberzs t1_jdux7i0 wrote
how do you think the water is heated for boilers?
[deleted] t1_jduxnyu wrote
[removed]
iksbob t1_jduyam5 wrote
Yeah, but that's just a gas explosion. Boilers are heavy pressure vessels. The burner could blow out and cause an explosion destroying the building, leaving the boiler tank sitting on its stand (less some insulation). Boiler explosions are a whole different thing - a (typically structurally-compromised) tank explodes due to reaching its pressure limit.
shewy92 t1_jdv2xp4 wrote
You know that sugar can be explosive, right? And chocolate has sugar in it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Georgia_sugar_refinery_explosion
>On 7 February 2008, fourteen people were killed and forty injured during a dust explosion at an Imperial Sugar owned refinery in Port Wentworth, Georgia, United States. Dust explosions had been an issue of concern among U.S. authorities since three fatal accidents in 2003, with efforts made to improve safety and reduce the risk of reoccurrence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_explosion
>A dust explosion is the rapid combustion of fine particles suspended in the air within an enclosed location. Dust explosions can occur where any dispersed powdered combustible material is present in high-enough concentrations in the atmosphere or other oxidizing gaseous medium, such as pure oxygen. In cases when fuel plays the role of a combustible material, the explosion is known as a fuel-air explosion.
>?Dust explosions are a frequent hazard in coal mines, grain elevators, and other industrial environments. They are also commonly used by special effects artists, filmmakers, and pyrotechnicians, given their spectacular appearance and ability to be safely contained under certain carefully controlled conditions.
GoliathTCB t1_jdv3v4e wrote
With the rumoured info available, here's my take: a gas leak caused an initial, smaller explosion and subsequent fire, that initial explosion's concussive blast disturbed what had previously been settled cocoa dust across rafters/pipes/vent shafts, and when this cloud of dust was sparked, the entire building became a pressure bomb in effect.
djpackrat t1_jdv4jq5 wrote
I grew up in that area, this makes me very sad :(
[deleted] t1_jdvc534 wrote
[removed]
Darko33 t1_jdvdcke wrote
Yeah this immediately came to mind for me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppau_explosion
Active_Journalist384 t1_jdvefjh wrote
Wow. Just hearing about this story
[deleted] t1_jdvfgdz wrote
[deleted]
Dave3786 t1_jdvfswr wrote
First line of the article makes it clear they’re all dead
Dcap16 t1_jdvh9oz wrote
Victim is appropriate. The use of bodies is so disrespectful to families imo. Someone’s son or daughter shouldn’t in the end be simply referred to as “body”. They’re a victim alive or dead.
[deleted] t1_jdvj1pa wrote
[removed]
Sioul_the_resilient t1_jdvk0ap wrote
Well not literally anything, but yes many things create combustible dusts that must be treated as hazardous. Dusts are actually tested for their ease of combustibility and the pressure created from combustion to rate the level of hazard and safety measures needed.
Source - have designed industrial dust collection systems and have done process safety evaluations with dust systems for work.
bkconn t1_jdvmira wrote
You just reminded me of this incredibly satisfying dust collection system I saw yesterday. The stone debris being drilled from a giant tunnel through a mountain bust be completely de-dusted in order to keep the tunnel air breathable for all the workers inside.
Exseatsniffer t1_jdvo3g3 wrote
You might be right, but it's not accurate. And I don't think the family would be more distraught by reading about bodies as they're pretty much at peak fucked up as it is and I'm pretty sure this article is the least of their problems right now. Journalism should be about accuracy, not about potential hurt feelings.
[deleted] t1_jdvosy1 wrote
[removed]
john_doe_jersey t1_jdvp481 wrote
People always seem to forget that safety regulations are written in blood.
I don't know if Trump's 2017 rollback of Obama-era safety rules put in place after the 2013 chemical plan explosion in TX was a factor here, but when safety takes a back seat to profits, people die.
[deleted] t1_jdvpi06 wrote
[removed]
axxl75 t1_jdvrf0k wrote
Victims is accurate just not as specific as it could be. And if you bothered to open the article literally the 3rd word is “bodies”.
You’re getting pedantic and upset over nothing.
[deleted] t1_jdvs6aa wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvszti wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvtran wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvu85b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvun99 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvvxdx wrote
[removed]
Relentless_Salami t1_jdvweko wrote
"Safety regulations are written in blood..." this man drank the Kool Aid at his OSHA 10 training.
persolb t1_jdvx037 wrote
Adding the word ‘dead’ after ‘found’ would work too. Or switch ‘victims’ to ‘killed’.
The important information is that they are not alive anymore.
WirelessBCupSupport t1_jdvx9tc wrote
Well, they might have found remnants of them...but I think "victims" is appropriate.
[deleted] t1_jdvxykn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvy5v9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvztxe wrote
mrg1957 t1_jdw0aq0 wrote
I used to replace the sulpur in my homemade gunpowder with sugar.
Dcap16 t1_jdw0dti wrote
It’s completely accurate. Want the full story? Read the article, not just headlines. Bodies is used to generate clicks.
[deleted] t1_jdw0ku3 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jdw26qy wrote
[removed]
persolb t1_jdw2hlz wrote
Yeah, we should stop pretending safety is our top priority. Safety is important, and people try to reduce risk, but in practice it almost always takes second place to doing what needs to be done.
Millions of people in the US drive to work everyday. ~100 of them die in vehicle accidents every day. Meanwhile ~5 people die a day at US workplaces (excluding vehicle accidents above and violence).
Kronqvist t1_jdw31r1 wrote
Funny, kinda sounds like you’re chugging kool-aid right now, just a different flavor.
Sinder77 t1_jdw3cmk wrote
Is it? Seems like the information being passed along was that those people were missing after the explosion, now they've been found.
Sinder77 t1_jdw3g1n wrote
Literally the first line of the article says "bodies".
TheGaussianMan t1_jdw3neg wrote
This guy has never worked in a factory or lab.
VanillaLifestyle t1_jdw46ic wrote
All the dead are victims but not all the victims are dead.
Sinder77 t1_jdw4di7 wrote
OK, but the headline is talking about whether or not they're been found.
biscovery t1_jdw4go7 wrote
Its implied that they were dead but i wasn’t sure til i read the comments. Probably could have just read the article but that’s a lot of work.
NordicDong t1_jdw5fad wrote
Found alive or recovered a body is a huge difference. You don't understand why people would want to know how many died vs stubbed their toe?
Sinder77 t1_jdw5mjo wrote
The article gives that detail. This is a headline.
It's literally the first line of the article that they're bodies were found.
NordicDong t1_jdw5qk6 wrote
Why not include that in the headline? It's intentionally misleading so you have to click. There will 100% be people who just read the headline and now believe 7 people just got found alive.
Sinder77 t1_jdw64pl wrote
Because the point of this article is that they have now found all of them.
Before, they were missing. Now, they are found. The news is that they have now been found.
kaizenkitten t1_jdw6yf0 wrote
Hey at least you know it was made in accordance to 29 CFR 1910.141 (h)
[deleted] t1_jdw6z85 wrote
[removed]
17times2 t1_jdw72gv wrote
Seriously. You can literally watch it happen in front of you. We have stricter regulations on our barrel makers because someone lost half a finger. Extra ventilation was only made when one summer our interior reached 130 degrees F and workers literally could not be in the plant for more than 5 minutes and were getting hospitalized from heat stroke.
17times2 t1_jdw7wgd wrote
> Millions of people in the US drive to work everyday. ~100 of them die in vehicle accidents every day. Meanwhile ~5 people die a day at US workplaces
...Is this attempting to minimalize fatalities in workplaces? Cars have new safety features put on or improved every single year to save lives. What do you think you're arguing here?
[deleted] t1_jdw87ig wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdw8fkj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdw8ks9 wrote
[removed]
NordicDong t1_jdwaqj0 wrote
Found means NOTHING without knowing if they're alive or not. You're either dense or pointlessly argumentative
[deleted] t1_jdwc1mt wrote
[removed]
S1DC t1_jdwc819 wrote
I lived in Lititz where Wilbur Chocolate operated for decades. At first I thought this was there somehow. Of course this isn't any better... damn
[deleted] t1_jdwctit wrote
[removed]
GoredonTheDestroyer t1_jdwfdbk wrote
Bro really thought he was cookin', huh.
Slapbox t1_jdwfhht wrote
Using "recovered" instead of "found" is the way to handle this, I think.
Sinder77 t1_jdwfvvm wrote
It's just the headline dude.
Like the alternative run would be that they're still missing. Which is also news. It's an ongoing situation that was updated. The update was that they're no longer looking for anyone as they've all been accounted for. I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall.
NordicDong t1_jdwgm0a wrote
The real update is that they're DEAD not just found bruh. Nobody cares that they were found. The status is what matters. Get it together smh
bradlees t1_jdwhx3l wrote
It seems he does. Maybe he just hates regulations (though it seems like he understands them)….. it’s just a weird opinion he has I guess.
Good choice in flashlights, motorcycles and stuff like that though so I’m reserving actual judgment here that he actually obeys OHSA even if he hates it. At least I hope so…
Dcap16 t1_jdwj5vh wrote
I agree. But, it’s just a headline. It’s become too normal to use body. Body this body that for one or two paragraph articles that serve no other purpose than to generate revenue from the dozen advertisements on the page. Last week locally “body pulled from pond” when the first paragraph gives the man’s name, age, circumstances (accident). Why not “56yo local man recovered from pond following accident”? It is just something that grinds my gears.
[deleted] t1_jdwj93f wrote
[deleted]
Free_Dimension1459 t1_jdwk06r wrote
Not like this. First the child labor. Now people’s lives too. Darn it big chocolate. Why you gotta ruin a good thing with your evils.
bradlees t1_jdwk5wj wrote
Oh I see persolb - dying is just a thing that everyone who goes into work just has to deal with. Like, who cares if you die at work. Right buddy?
Except people no longer have to die. Follow these rules and put this gear on or use these guards or follow these steps and you will never get killed at a job. Which is why your statistics are so low for workplace deaths.
I’m am betting you never saw someone get killed at work. Have you?
I have. Twice. Both “just wanted to get things done”. No extra time was saved and both will never see their kids grow up or go home again.
Comments like yours are just coming from a place where you don’t know any better. I felt that way too. Then I saw a guy get crushed. Another get smashed into the warehouse floor after falling from the top level racking.
preprandial_joint t1_jdwkjd1 wrote
they sub to antiwork too ironically.
"We don't need no OSHA regulations to tell me how to do my job!" and "What's that? You expect me to put effort into my job?"
Mentalpatient87 t1_jdwlch5 wrote
Yeah, but they didn't cram every detail of the article in the headline. So Reddit thinks that makes it clickbait or something.
FourFurryCats t1_jdwmbzk wrote
Sugar explosions are never a pretty sight.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Georgia_sugar_refinery_explosion
TraditionalRest808 t1_jdwnmlm wrote
Factory dust explosion fact.
A dime high of dust can cause an explosion.
The carbon in the sugar makes this type of explosive very dangerous.
TheGaussianMan t1_jdwny36 wrote
Oof keep this guy far away from where I work please.
kaihatsusha t1_jdwpnle wrote
Deregulation is another word for "let's relive past tragedies!"
unropednope t1_jdwpxdo wrote
Doubtful. This occurred in a building separate from the actual factory, near the human resources department. Gas leak.
TraditionalRest808 t1_jdwq3tv wrote
Doughtful?
Perhaps you didn't read.
I didn't say dust caused the incident, only that this is a safety fact taught to factory workers from science?
Does that help your comment?
ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jdwq8mu wrote
Yup. Whenever you see a “don’t do XYZ,” it’s because some did it.
A perfect example of this just happened to a guy I know. He uses these machines at work. He was training a new guy and explicitly said, “there’s no guard here, but make sure your fingers don’t go in. This thing’ll pull them right off.” A few days later, the guy know accidentally got a finger in there and was just barely able to save it. He got incredibly lucky and easily could’ve lost a whole hand. And now they finally decided to pay someone to put guards on those specific machines to prevent it.
Relentless_Salami t1_jdwti9q wrote
I partake in plenty of subs thst I generally don't align philosophically with. I'm actually a former union EHS rep. And ironically I work in an industrial lab/testing facility. I keep myself and my co-workers plenty safe.
[deleted] t1_jdwts4f wrote
[removed]
persolb t1_jdx0677 wrote
You realize this is Reddit right?
spachi1281 t1_jdx09jh wrote
Yes even creamer that folks use in their coffee. I think someone can pull up the relevant Mythbusters clip of them testing this.
persolb t1_jdx0zd9 wrote
Four times. Two suicides by train, one roll away and crush, one because a scissor lift failed.
Excluding the two suicides, neither was ‘because they wanted to get it done’.
You missed the part where I said the goal is to mitigate risk. That does not mean safety is the first priority. The safest job is always the one that doesn’t happen.
persolb t1_jdx3eco wrote
I guess my point was that, much like driving to work, people take risks people take risks when working. The biggest risk, by far, that people take is driving to work in the first place.
The remainder of the risks are minuscule in comparison. A defensive driving course would make everyone safer than OSHA 10.
ogipogo t1_jdx3ewu wrote
I'm glad you aren't responsible for my safety.
Relentless_Salami t1_jdx60jd wrote
Why because I said someone drank the Kool Aid during their OSHA 10? What an odd way to come to a conclusion lol. The internet man.......haha.
[deleted] t1_jdx8uuc wrote
[deleted]
Jayce_T t1_jdx8wpy wrote
And that unless the fines and punishments are high enough, big companies will flaunt them anyway and eat the cost
17times2 t1_jdx949c wrote
> A defensive driving course would make everyone safer than OSHA 10.
Do you have a stat for this, or are you just continuing to minimize the efforts of workplace safety? There's a big difference between idiots on the road you have little to no control over, and say, an exposed pump with moving parts that has been reported 3 times to management until Phil got too close and it pulled his hand in and now they finally put a metal shield over the damn thing. Although I guess Phil's wasn't a fatality so he doesn't count against workplace safety...
Orleanian t1_jdxadi9 wrote
I mean... wouldn't this headline lead me to believe that I should call MarySue up and congratulate her on her son having been found?
Which would be inappropriate, as it was his dead body that was found, and my condolences that should have been offered?
persolb t1_jdxagd7 wrote
You are arguing a straw man. I never said we should ignore safety, I said safety wasn’t number 1.
If safety was number 1, we’d all refuse to drive to work.
17times2 t1_jdxej30 wrote
Then by that logic, all of us should stay and hide in bed because there's danger outside. Congrats, you win the useless pedantic argument award.
richalex2010 t1_jdxgj5l wrote
There's other terms. "Remains of all 7 Pennsylvania chocolate factory victims found" would more accurately describe the victims' deceased condition without being disrespectful.
richalex2010 t1_jdxgpcj wrote
Which means you might click thinking they've found someone alive, and only after they have the ad revenue do you find out the truth. It's not as bad as many, but it's still clickbait.
Dcap16 t1_jdxlw2d wrote
Many other options than body. But it is just a headline.
[deleted] t1_jdxqs39 wrote
[removed]
sugar_addict002 t1_jdxtg4n wrote
Do they have an idea of what caused this explosion?
Brohara97 t1_jdxxjm0 wrote
Never thought about that before but you’re right! I think that may grind my gears now too!
Brohara97 t1_jdxxpcz wrote
I thought it was too. Absolute tragedy either way though
God_of_Illiteracy t1_jdy3t0v wrote
I live not far and have friends in the Fire police. From he said that they need to finish clearing debris before they can start an investigation.
[deleted] t1_jdy3v4u wrote
Janixon1 t1_jdycvue wrote
Mythbusters did an episode on this. I think they used non-dairy creamer. They created a helluva fireball
Skewk t1_jdyehbx wrote
Do you have a particular reason or examples to share why you disagree?
Keylime29 t1_jdynxx9 wrote
It took until today to find them all?? What blew up, exactly?
[deleted] t1_jdyvsc5 wrote
[removed]
The__hex t1_jdz0iqp wrote
Hmm… i dont like the look of it. Oom.
[deleted] t1_jdz38pd wrote
throwaway661375735 t1_jdzn5r7 wrote
Seems to me news which is a bit late bit. Chock-late news, to those who matter most.
throwaway661375735 t1_jdznj6e wrote
Guards like that cost money. Corporations don't like to spend money, unless lobbying is more expensive. Its the reason trains derail so often. Lobbying, is much cheaper than fixing the problem. 😕
[deleted] t1_je00vsz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je016ee wrote
[removed]
graveybrains t1_je164ud wrote
The expectation that whole articles can be crammed down into the space of a headline is getting out of hand.
persolb t1_je1wwou wrote
If the whole update can be a headline it should be. The entire rest of that article is filler.
Just to prove the point, I asked ChatGPT to summarize the headline in three ways and got:
Seven dead in Pennsylvania chocolate factory explosion
Seven fatalities confirmed in Pennsylvania chocolate factory explosion
West Reading community mourns loss of seven lives in chocolate factory explosion
​
Someone paid to do it should be able to come up with a better headline. I also, after some persuasion, got it to provide click-bait versions...
"You won't believe what caused the deadly explosion at this chocolate factory!"
"Exclusive: Eyewitness reveals shocking details about the chocolate factory blast in Pennsylvania"
"Is the chocolate industry hiding something? Tragic explosion at factory raises questions"
[deleted] t1_je209ky wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je52utr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je538tg wrote
[removed]
morphballganon t1_jducg4c wrote
What does a chocolate factory need that is explosive enough to kill 7 people?