LackSufficient7852

LackSufficient7852 OP t1_j04h4o1 wrote

That’s an interesting piece of history! I’ll look into it. The problem with the council is that there are no laws around water mitigation or water requirements in our area. There are however laws in the areas around us. The council was approached about this three years ago and they voted it down knowing that housing would be built in areas that had no water.

3

LackSufficient7852 OP t1_j04gme3 wrote

Nope, everything appeared fine which is why I am making this post. Every piece of paper we got said everything was ok when in fact Brookline is a low yield well area and you may need to install multiple wells. Our neighbor has four! Just don‘t want unsuspecting people to get suckered like we did.

32

LackSufficient7852 OP t1_j03ubym wrote

The well is 1000 feet. It’s the town councils problem because they were introduced legislation three years ago to require that wells are properly functioning before selling a house. They voted against it and the developers are knowingly selling bum homes and the council will verbally abuse anyone who says otherwise. Guess they are getting some kick backs from the developers. These are $750,000 homes, its not nothing.

17

LackSufficient7852 OP t1_j03rmin wrote

Not yet. Nobody seems to know what to do and we are all in dire restraints as water is not something you can live without. Even if we do get an attorney I will be out of pocket a lot of money by the end of it. Everyone is afraid that their property value will drop. Personally I just want the well fixed and sound the alarm. Nobody should have to go through something like this.

11