Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j1c2naz wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

umumgeet t1_j1c4cgd wrote

Why isn't this legal yet anywhere globally?

28

[deleted] t1_j1c62pg wrote

Oral cannabis products, opposed to all those other methods

37

EvelcyclopS t1_j1c8aq5 wrote

No reason to legislate against it then right?

Sounds like it’s less damaging than alcohol.

569

RTukka t1_j1cdavl wrote

The rules state that a media summary of a peer reviewed article is acceptable. If the submitted article doesn't link the peer-reviewed article directly (this article does) then you're supposed to leave a comment to the peer-reviewed source.

32

Rombledore t1_j1cf6zw wrote

rectal valium exists because the walls of your rectum are really good at absorbing the valium into the blood stream (diastat- rectal valium for use when your having a siezure and need it to stop pronto).i would thing an rectum cannabis would be just as fast acting so there's merit to a suppository dosage form.

2

diagnosedwolf t1_j1cfu4c wrote

Oral as opposed to inhalation. Australia has A Thing about inhalation drugs. Cigarettes are so heavily taxed that a pack of 25 costs around $50. A pack a day smoker would spend more than $12k per year in Australia.

There has been a lot of resistance to the idea of just replacing tobacco with weed in case it sends lung conditions back to number 1 place on our death list. Studies about other methods of delivering cannabis to your body are really useful to dispel some of the doubt.

152

diagnosedwolf t1_j1cte5m wrote

That’s still an inhalation method. Anything other than air - whether it’s water vapour or wood smoke or literally any other kind of air pollutant - inhaled into the lungs increases the incidence of lung disease. Australia has A Thing about inhalants.

26

mr_doppertunity t1_j1d1m2e wrote

Barring “hurr durr Big Beer lobby” and “weed banned cuz racism in 60s”, it’s not studied thoroughly yet. For now we know that smoking weed before an individual turns 25 hurts brain development with repercussions still unknown. And I guarantee you kids will be smoking joints since school. Alcohol, due to its effect and withdrawal effects, is too strong of a drug to be used as regularly by a random individual comparing to weed, so please don’t bring it to discussion.

Edit: Oh no, I hurt the Big Weed feelings.

−36

willydajackass t1_j1d1vd8 wrote

Any trial with weed just has a bunch of happy people sitting around eating all the snacks too damn high to notice any negative side effects. Stop harassing my buzz bro!

44

LumberSmurf t1_j1d82i0 wrote

FAR LESS, why do you think they have been trying to destroy it for years?

It's one of the few medications that doesn't come with a huge list of detrimental side effects.

Truly God's gift to mankind but many are too greedy to see it.

308

badchad65 t1_j1daaaq wrote

A comparator group would have done this study wonders.

49

OneHumanPeOple t1_j1degx4 wrote

Oh no. Boof = butt. I’m old school, unlike that fellow and his chums who’ve all got oral fixations and have filled their calendar with events in which they funnel booze into their gullets and scar young women for life.

9

herpaderpadont t1_j1dknqy wrote

I don’t think “they” want us dependent on alcohol. I do think there are huge alcohol lobbyist that conspire to keep marijuana illegal in a lot of states.

I do think there are still stigmas held against marijuana especially by the older generation.

107

LumberSmurf t1_j1do7cg wrote

Isn't it funny how things that have serious withdrawals are legal? Not just alcohol either, look at many prescriptions. "they" are predators, they get people addicted and reap the profits. Think this "fentanyl" is just a coincidence? Just happens its right after they get caught massively over-prescribing opioids?

4

ADHD_NO_PHD t1_j1doxrw wrote

Oh boy… I wish I could tell everyone about my experience growing up in small Christian-wannabe town turned “ghetto” (I hope you know what I mean) and also going to a private Christian school by a HUUUUGE military base. The evangelicals are INSANE and there are a LOT. Nervous and anxious to their core, never leaving their bubble.

This is what weed being illegal and alcohol being legal represent to me. The patterns are too common and precise to be a coincidence. It’s narcissistic to the core.

These private Christian schools are basically trying to raise mini-ceos. These are frat boys. These are politicians. They’re becoming doctors. This is white nationalism. This is what’s keeping weed illegal. I want to be wrong. “town hall syndrome” is what me and my buddies that have come to the realization call it

6

AtuinTurtle t1_j1dv8kw wrote

Mine have made a world of difference for my health.

1

WhenSquirrelsFry t1_j1dwt93 wrote

Idk the longer we live the more we will spend. I don’t think it’s a conspiracy, I just think it’s a byproduct of capitalism/greed. I’ve never had a doctor urge me to stay on a medication beyond it’s necessary treatment, and I have some significant medical issues. My doctors suggest things like acupuncture, physical therapy, meditation and mindfulness practices, and are hesitant to prescribe meds.

1

CuteDerpster t1_j1e2081 wrote

Boofing may actually make it less effective.

Sure, more thc enters your bloodstream, but an important thing for oral cannabis is the first pass metabolism where thc is converted to 11-OH-THC, which is just as, if not even more psychoactive than thc.

Boofing may be as short lived as inhalation, while oral consumption works for hours on end.

6

swllc t1_j1e24cq wrote

Citation 31 from the PLOS study:

>Regular recreational users according to the Australian National Alcohol and Drug Knowledgebase (NADK) [31] use 150-250mg THC per day with unknown concentrations and doses of the hundreds of other cannabinoids, including CBD.

This seems quite extreme with the citation linked stating that 76% report < 5 "cones/joints/bongs used per occasion" and only 14% report usage of "every day". This citation isn't particularly relevant to the study other than to compare the dosage prescribed vs. 'average', but data point seems off nonetheless.

NADK

26

n3w4cc01_1nt t1_j1e2kb6 wrote

it's almost like they keep it illegal at a federal level to generate ad rev from clickbait. they've studied it for 100yrs now it's an effective medicine.

2

scootscooterson t1_j1e3zpj wrote

It’s Occam’s razor. Social conservatives are scared of drugs and there’s lots of money to be made in keeping drugs illegal. The general principle is don’t waste time on conspiracies when simple linear answers exist.

6

OneHumanPeOple t1_j1e52ns wrote

I actually don’t have enough of that enzyme that does the conversion so it takes about 4 hours for me to feel any effect and then I am extremely high for about 3 days. My first experience with oral administration was an absolute living nightmare where I was unable to leave what I thought was a sofa for days. Turns out it was an unassembled ikea futon, essentially a pile of boards that I laid on for 72 hours as people came and went all around me.

10

BreakfastX t1_j1e5reo wrote

I happen to live on a border town in Wisconsin and our local smoke shop carries D9 edibles. We even had a stall during our town summer festival selling them as well as smokables in the middle of it all. I never thought I'd live to see the day. First time I even heard of legally purchasable THC products in WI was while vacationing in the Dells and saw an ad for a shop next to the jerky place in the middle of the main tourist center. Now I know what that first guy to buy grass from Colorado felt like. Pretty sure I had the same expression on my face as he had in the photo.

3

CuteDerpster t1_j1e6718 wrote

Yeah that sounds horrible.

Considering my body has some weird kinks with methylation and breakdown of estrogen metabolites.... Maybe I should do an ultra low dose the first time I try edibles x) do NOT want to experience a 3 day trip.

5

OneHumanPeOple t1_j1e6v0q wrote

How do they feel about inhaled medicines like albuterol? Or inhaled corticosteroids? My sister lives in Brisbane and just had a severe asthma episode. Does the inhaled drug stigma extend to those drugs?

I used to smoke 25 cigarettes per day. I did quit 15 years ago. And granted, I didn’t replace it with anything at the time, I couldn’t fathom attempting a 1:1 replacement with joints. I didn’t try marijuana until my 40s in order to address medical issues. People with epilepsy and cancer who need round the clock relief usually don’t rely on inhaled THC anyhow because it’s short acting.

2

_Asparagus_ t1_j1e8jk7 wrote

Yeah 150-250mg seems a little crazy for regular recreational use. When I used to use edibles a single 15mg definutely did the trick for me. Maybe I'm a lightweight but I can't even fathom what 10, let alone 16 of those would do to me holy fookin shite

24

CrusaderOfTruth t1_j1ea4e9 wrote

Seriously, those numbers are so messed up. I ingest fairly often, not every single day, and 10mg is a nice high. If I was taking 150-250mg a day I would be convinced life isn't real.

21

CuteDerpster t1_j1ed6vb wrote

Erm..... Yes, the enzyme to metabolize estrogen in the liver is also of the cyp 450 family.

Cyp (450) 3a4.

Cyp3a4 as well as cyp2c9 are the ones responsible for thc metabolism.

Both of the cytochrome 450 family.

2

BreakfastX t1_j1ee4kc wrote

Granted I have very little experience with old fashioned cannabis derived THC, but Hemp derived D9 does the job well. An effective dose for me is about 20mg at 260lbs especially if I take it before a meal (as opposed to after).

I actually prefer D8 personally with an effective dose of 40mg. Feels much less fuzzy which allows me focus and enjoy movies or games like they're brand new even if I've seen them 100 times.

Unfortunately my local smoke shop is choosing to only stock D9 because it's "real" so my dwindling supply gets much less attention than I'd like.

3

Fringelunaticman t1_j1ee6n9 wrote

This is far from true. The hippies were a tiny tiny section of people in the 60s/70s. The vast majority didn't smoke pot when younger. This pew research shows just 4% had smoked pot in the year 1969.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/6331/decades-drug-use-data-from-60s-70s.aspx

Boomers are the biggest new consumers of cannabis but they doesn't mean they used in the 60s. Pop culture just makes you think they did because the hippies were the loudest group and most written about group of that time. Plus, they are idolized because of their anti-establishment ideas

12

SEND-ME-FEET-P1CS t1_j1eecbn wrote

Not true, as we get to senior status, the government and businesses start having to pay for us to live. Not to mention we end up not being in shape to work and retire so theres really no use for people in a business sense once you hit retirement age, cant even have kids in most cases and the risk for mental diseases/illness drastically go up the older you get so that alone creates even more problems for bigwigs to have to pay more for assisted living

1

SEND-ME-FEET-P1CS t1_j1eeqwq wrote

While I agree with your point that the government just wanted all forms of marijuana in general to be outlawed, if you think Reefer Madness wasnt a conspiracy against weed, then you need to actually look at what was contained in that footage. I mean for fucks sake the poster even shows people smoking pot with weird anti-weed slogans

1

Classic_Beautiful973 t1_j1efsnv wrote

Orders of magnitude less. You couldn't survive taking 50x the typical dosage if it wasn't the case. Active:lethal dose ratio is very often a direct predictor of the damage the drug is doing. That, how dissimilar it is to endogenous neurotransmitters, and how much the systems the interact with interfere with physiology. 4-ho-dmt aka psilocin, the metabolized version of psilocybin in mushrooms, is a structural cousin of tryptophan, is a selective agonist to a subtype of serotonin receptors associated primarily with non physiological functions like mood, perception, cognition, sense of self, and has a LD50 on the order of dried pounds.

Literally in rats about 3g mushrooms per kg of rat for LD50. That's basically going to be more plant material than you could even bring yourself to swallow before puking. Still risky in other ways, especially without a sitter, or inexperienced taking too much, but outcomes tend to be net positive or neutral when taken with care. Sometimes even people who take way too much with no experience make it through with borderline miraculous experiences like Paul Stamets stutter cessation and some cases of nerve growth repair. And certainly at least temporary remission of depression, anxiety, pain disorders, and other semi-common mental illnesses. Can't say the same for alcohol, or any other significant drug sans cannabis.

More dangerous substances tend to interact with the broad spectrum of a neurotransmitter, or multiple, usually with dopamine, GABA, norepinephrine, or opioid, some adrenaline ones. Or in the case of alcohol, GABA + NMDA iirc. And anyone who knows drugs knows that combining those two classes together is extremely risky, but that's just what alcohol is naturally.

NMDA (antagonists) in isolation are also interesting because it basically just affects south of the head nerve function. Hence, anesthesia and dissociative anesthetic experiences that are powerful but still have a pretty wide range of potential survivable dose compared to alcohol, although less than HT-2A-based stuff and cannabis. Often dangerous things are reputable inhibitors which just trick existing signals to stay rather than introducing cousins of what's already there that fits the same key hole. And when receptors and endogenous agonists downregulate to try to bring you back to hemeostasis, after which the false "on" switch is removed, your physiological systems start to have issues because of not enough signaling. By contrast, HT-2A agonists like psilocybin have even been shown to stimulate nerve and neuron growth through a similar pathway that light cardio does.

But anyway, I'm no neuroscientist and this stuff gets confusing very quickly. But to reduce it, alcohol is basically one of the most dangerous drugs there is, especially because it's culturally sanctioned, easily available, and liquid at room temp, therefore comes across as less harmful. The preparations for other drugs are just much more unique by comparison to alcohol being little different than pouring a ginger ale

51

CuteDerpster t1_j1eif05 wrote

This I learned by googling.

My issues with methylation I noticed when I took methylsulfonymethan for skin and nail benefits and it really messed me up x)

As for my issues with estrogen..... I have to take endogenous estrogen, and despite very low doses, my blood levels were sky high, way higher than they should be.

3

imasitegazer t1_j1ep285 wrote

I have high estrogen and low progesterone so I take progesterone for two weeks of the month.

I’ve heard of genetic testing for the MTHER gene, so I was wondering if the Cyp450 was a similar test.

1

ryanwalraven t1_j1epcgv wrote

This. Older folk like to take claim Rock n Roll, Woodstock, psychedelic art, and literature as part of their contributions to culture, but hippies were widely scorned and demonized at the time and the war of drugs was meant to criminalize their behavior.

5

Flashdancer405 t1_j1esi68 wrote

Too bad the federal government is 50 years behind the times

0

gandolfthe t1_j1et0p5 wrote

I've been making cannabis tinctures for almost 10 years now.

It is wonderful to have a selection and I can set the dose. Need to workout, well six drops of this one. Want to murder a range rover driver, I need 12 drops of this one to chill. Want to extra enjoy a movie well it's time for 18 drops of this one...

1

Magerune t1_j1f1brg wrote

Quantities matter.

Work somewhere that dust is visible and don’t wear a dust mask and tell me how well your body handles it.

Vape is VISIBLE particulate, if you think it isn’t gumming up peoples lungs while still being “non toxic” you are kidding yourself.

2

ImaginaryMairi t1_j1f62q2 wrote

Anyone know the best oral products? I've been smoking daily for a few years now and have tried edibles but they've never worked, so I'm curious if anyone has had the same experience/found a healthier alternative

1

Tshoe77 t1_j1f7mb0 wrote

I really want to know about my method, the dry herb vaporizer. I know it's not healthy, but I really want to see it versus smoking.

1

Ok_Lie_3330 t1_j1fdcax wrote

Maybe you can help me out then. They don’t work on me, have eaten 700mg of California state gummies 3 or 4 times and it never worked. My buddy told me you have to not smoke for a day or two prior, but that doesn’t sound right. Pothead supposed to go 2 days without just to get zooted?

0

Hanifsefu t1_j1ffwo8 wrote

I went in to look at the study that the article was based on. The results were essentially that there was a significant placebo effect in their double blind trials where people on placebos reported significant pain reduction. They also made a connection between usually high media attention on the subject to the significant placebo effects they observed.

They ultimate conclude there is a gap in the current research that needs to be filled by high-quality clinical trials before they can recommend it for pain relief.

It seems legitimate unfortunately but it still is just a call for more research on the subject which is exactly what it needs and that research will just give us a more complete picture on why it works.

0

curiosityasmedicine t1_j1fg1ee wrote

Some states have banned delta 8 but sounds like that’s not you since you have local shops selling! And the three brands I mentioned are reputable with their COAs. Before I moved to a state with legal recreational cannabis I ordered my D8 from those 3 places I mentioned. Hell, I still often prefer the D8 and D9 gummies I order online to anything local dispensaries sell.

1

diagnosedwolf t1_j1fgls9 wrote

They are toxic. Our lungs have defence mechanisms designed to prevent us inhaling dirt and dust. The mucocilia escalator in your lungs, plus an army of white blood cells, work hard to keep your lungs clean.

The problem is that you’re only equipped to deal with a very small amount of dirt and dust. And even then, you get damage. This is how your lungs wear out over the course of your life. Inhaling smoke, city air, water vapour - it all wears your lungs out faster.

1

Fit-Anything8352 t1_j1flj9s wrote

No it doesn't. By that logic religion (praying for less pain) is an effective pain relief technique. Drugs are classified according to their actual effects on people, not on people who convinced themselves to stop feeling pain independent of the drug with a placebo effect.

0

Fit-Anything8352 t1_j1flrae wrote

If you can will yourself to perceive less pain independent of the drug then you don't need the drug. Substitute a sugar pill and convince yourself to feel less pain the same way. That's what the placebo effect is.

If you were developing a new pain medication and in a clinical study you found that 50% of the control group felt less pain and 50% of the group who took your drug felt less pain, you would classify your drug as ineffective, because it doesn't do anything. Not as 50% effective because everyone felt less pain.

−2

leafandvine89 t1_j1fsgam wrote

It has made my life with Long haul Lyme Disease and Multiple Sclerosis livable again. My husband and I make our own oil and put it into capsules that I take nightly to help with neurological, muscular, and joint pain. I'll never have to go back to opioids.

4

sunplaysbass t1_j1ftbqq wrote

Edibles change into a different active chemical through digestion that’s longer lasting and often heavier / trippy. But it screws up my sleep. There is more of a hangover than with smoking / vaping. Setting aside lung damage.

1

unlocked_axis02 t1_j1fxylg wrote

Yeah I’m starting to realize I almost definitely have bad anxiety ,and honestly when I get checked I’m hoping to get my card afterwards since I suck at swallowing pills and at least in theory it sounds like it would be better since weed and things like cbd extract as far as i know doesn’t have as many side effects and if I need other meds later it may not effect them as much.

3

diagnosedwolf t1_j1g3nxg wrote

The stigma is attached to COPD - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Having COPD is a big problem, and causes a huge strain the on healthcare system. If you “give yourself” COPD, it’s seen as an unfair burden to society.

Asthma medications are not included in this stigma, because they don’t cause COPD, they treat it. That said, Ventolin (which causes COPD with extended use) is not as readily prescribed in Australia as it is in some other countries. It’s used only as an acute treatment, not as a preventative treatment. The inhaled corticosteroids are preferred even though they have other, sometimes severe, side effects.

There is also an oral asthma medication that is very en vogue in Australia right now.

2

cellenium125 t1_j1g41ib wrote

They make me go insane and not feel right for a month. Maybe good for some people but be ware.

1

Hanifsefu t1_j1g60s4 wrote

Thankfully the world of science isn't limited to just your understanding otherwise we'd never be able to study anything.

"I don't understand it" is not even a real argument. That's just burying your head in the sand refusing to learn and assuming everything outside of your bubble of knowledge can't be true.

2

GiantGapingButthole t1_j1g6w36 wrote

This is not a well controlled study. I’m not opposed to legalization or recreational use, but I have yet to see evidence that corroborates the safety and efficacy to the degree this paper does. I think there are neuropsychiatric effects that can be problematic, and I see that having watched tons of people get hospitalized due to unmasked bipolar disorder and psychosis; depressed patients with insomnia with sleep architecture that is likely worsened by cannabis. Weed should be decriminalized, and it should be regulated imo. We don’t know enough about it.

3

unlocked_axis02 t1_j1gvr1b wrote

Definitely I know people who early on when they first started trying weed accidentally set off panic attacks from taking to much so the best results is a low dose I’m pretty small so a low dose is especially important to have

2

Tshoe77 t1_j1ktsyq wrote

I'd like to see that with dry herb vape. That is informative, but yea those little liquid cart vapes are obviously not considered super well

1