Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Dfrickster87 t1_j1qen3k wrote

This is my job. 3 rodent hairs per 100g of tomato paste is allowed. 4 is a fail. Insect fragments, there is no limit. 1 rodent hair with skin still attached to it is automatic fail.

In 6 years I haven't seen any skin still attached to a hair. 2017 was the worst year I've seen, alot of samples with 4 hairs or more. This year wasn't too bad.

But also, its all really random. You can't use the product after testing it so only a portion is tested representing a huge sample size. If a "fail" sample was to be retested, it would very likely have nothing in it. If a passing sample was retested, it wouldn't be surprising at all to come up as a fail.

253

Hrtzy t1_j1qfjg2 wrote

How exactly does one count rodent hairs in tomato paste?

68

Dfrickster87 t1_j1qgn6x wrote

First you extract them, then you read them under a microscope.

Extraction: add 100g tomato paste to 2L Wildman trap flask, add 20 mL castor oil (the light filth sticks to the oil), add water to neck of flask, stir, let it sit for 30 min, stirring every 10 min, trap upper inch of sample (the oil floats with the filth attached) and decant into beaker, raise water level again, let it sit 10 min, repeat decanting, repeat this step, then discard the water in the 2L flask and add fresh water and the sample in the beaker that you have decanted. Let it sit 10 min, decant one last time. Finally, filter whats in the beaker through a circular filter paper connected to a vacuum, this way they water and oil goes through, leaving just the light filth and tomato pulp. That filter paper gets read under a microscope, count the pieces you find.

200

Hrtzy t1_j1qleli wrote

This is fascinating. Thanks for answering.

53

Dfrickster87 t1_j1qpqd3 wrote

Absolutely

27

Flockofseagulls25 t1_j1qx3u3 wrote

I’m curious, does your job ever affect the way you feel about food, or eating in general?

21

Dfrickster87 t1_j1r354f wrote

Not me. But thats more to do with me than the job. I'll eat almost anything if it tastes good. Some people in the department it definitely does turn them off of certain products.

Other things I've learned in the job include: peanut products have consistently high levels of aflatoxin, which can cause cancer. Same with Mexican pumpkin seeds, or pepitas. Brazil nuts have "rancid" results very consistently, regardless of how fresh they are. On the other end of that, coconut oil seemingly never goes bad. We have had a shelf life sample the entire 6 years I've worked there that is still the same low levels of rancidity as when it was started.

63

Atomskie t1_j1rozfq wrote

No, no, don't stop.

25

Dfrickster87 t1_j1sei9v wrote

Ummmm...I shared most of what I could think already but ill try with some more tidbits.

2% milk often actually has 1.5-1.99% fat.

The leftover ground almonds that we test for aflatoxin often end up in makeup products, I've been told. We sell the ground almonds cheap and I think they use the oils.

Almonds that fail aflatoxin testing often end up in cow feed. Because of that, dairy products need aflatoxin testing too. But don't worry about that one. Somehow the levels don't really transfer to dairy products. But....if it does, its in such low levels that it won't affect adults, but could affect infants. And so there are different detection levels required if the product is specifically meant for infants. Other than a cows digestive system essentially diluting the aflatoxin levels, bleach is the only thing that will kill it. Quick harvest and proper storage conditions of almonds is important in keeping these levels low, because it grows on mold.

In butter, moisture, fat and salt testing is done in a series of tests without needing to test separate portions for each test. Its called the Kohman method.

Fat testing in meat is done in an apparatus called Soxhlet. Visually, I think it looks like Walter Whites set-up in Breaking Bad.

29

Captain-Cadabra t1_j1szgu9 wrote

So I need to bleach my baby’s milk, good to know, good to know.

writes this down

10

Puzzled-Broccoli7849 t1_j1sf68s wrote

This is so interesting, I’ve wondered in the past how they measure these things. Thanks for sharing!

9

berationalhereplz t1_j1rplqq wrote

But products contain fats, carbs, and proteins- everything that a bacterium needs to grow. Coconut oil is just mono-, di-, and triglycerides of caprylic and capric acid so unlikely that anything could grow on that.

1

Dfrickster87 t1_j1sc91s wrote

In chemistry, fat and oil are interchangeable terms. The oil oxidizes and goes rancid. Coconut oil doesn't oxidize anywhere near as fast as others.

7

berationalhereplz t1_j1sjfg0 wrote

The point I’m making is that you need all 3, whereas coconut oil only has 1. Yes, being capric and caprylic vs linoleic, linolenyl, or ricinoleic acid esters would indeed preclude oxidation. But you can get this from basically any hydrogenated oil, be it palm oil or soybean oil.

0

Dfrickster87 t1_j1skv9b wrote

I have a feeling you have more in depth knowledge than I do. But all I can say is that we do the same testing on palm oil. The tests are Free Fatty Acid and Peroxide Value. Palm oil results start to rise in a few months, and coconut oil hasn't risen in 6 years.

Edit: there may be more variables at play than I am aware of. But in our lab, they have the same storage conditions.

3

berationalhereplz t1_j1souhv wrote

Yes the palm oil is rich in oleic, linoleic, etc. but fully hydrogenated palm oil (e.g., stearine) should not show oxidation due to the lack of double bonds.

1

Fetlocks_Glistening t1_j1qqgoh wrote

What does one study to qualify?

4

Dfrickster87 t1_j1qrpsf wrote

I work in the chemistry department. But they hire anyone with a degree in any science, ideally. And essentially any college degree can get you hired in the company. They also hire people with HS diploma at assistant levels and are willing to promote and train you if you put in the work. I only have a HS diploma.

My department manager was an engineering major. Actually, less than half of the department went to school for chemistry.

Edit: I should clarify that the test was originally part of our "food safety" department but that department is 1/5th the size of the chemistry department so they trained us and transferred the testing to the larger department. We also have a microbiology department but they are already understaffed and have to work 10-16 hour shifts, they couldn't take it on.

27

theme25 t1_j1qrete wrote

Probably quality assurance and food standard regulation certificates

3

kshump t1_j1rl36j wrote

One, two, and then - wait for it - three.

0

zerobeat t1_j1qke9d wrote

"The really gross part is that rodents don't shed" or so they always told us years ago.

6

juenavei t1_j1qts92 wrote

this isn't accurate, rodents do shed. rats shed all the time when they clean themselves it's just not noticed because of how how fastidious they are about cleaning

10

a_drive t1_j1qho9x wrote

You know we grow vegetables in shit right?

93

onioning t1_j1r2mag wrote

My favorite /r/kitchenconfidential moment was when the sub mocked me for suggesting that produce that fell on the floor could be washed and used safely. You know, produce. That stuff that literally grows out of the ground, which I can assure people is quite dirty.

Friendly reminder for folks that just because people work in kitchens doesn't mean they know jack about food safety. Sometimes I see people suggest that folks should ask food safety questions in that sub. You should not. Very definitely should not.

33

BlackJesus1001 t1_j1repie wrote

That's probably got more to do with the low cost of produce and high rates of drug usage in the average kitchen, better safe than sorry especially for a head of lettuce that costs a dollar or whatever.

Also kitchens are frequently greasy so it might not be practical to clean some types of produce.

Also shit that gets dropped often bruises and again, produce specifically tends to be a tiny fraction of costs.

I think I understand why the people at kitchenconfidential were mocking you.

6

onioning t1_j1rg8k5 wrote

Certainly many places have policies to not use stuff that's fallen on the floor. That's more laziness than anything else though. And sure, there may be quality issues that keep you from using something. It remains true that produce can be safely consumed after falling on the floor.

If your floor is so greasy that you can't wash a piece of produce that fell on it then your floor is the problem. Grease can be washed off though.

If someone thinks that produce can not be made safe by washing that is profoundly stupid. Don't defend that idiocy. Just mind bogglingly stupid.

Not sure what drug use has to do with anything though. Are you saying it's justifiable that people believe stupid things because they use drugs?

8

UnassumingPseudonym t1_j1srtrk wrote

(TLDR because I started rambling, but short version is that most restaurants are required by health codes to not make an effort to salvage or clean dropped food items because of how profoundly stupid a lot of cooks can be, which makes washing unreliable as a policy, even though it absolutely can be done effectively)

It's less to do with what's actually, logically safe and healthy and more to do with health code regulations, rather than just laziness. Yeah, if you drop something on the floor and it's practical to clean it, you absolutely can clean it and continue to use it without getting anyone sick. Unfortunately, for restaurants, you've got health authorities who can absolutely shut you down if they find out you don't do everything by the book (which washing and using dropped things isn't permitted in a lot of areas), so for restaurants it's almost always less of a headache to just throw it out if it drops, especially when you have a large number of employees, some of whom definitely aren't bright enough to remember to lie to a health inspector if they're ever asked about what's commonly done around the workplace (and who aren't bright enough to properly wash dropped things in the first place even if it were allowed)

Also, and more importantly, r/kitchenconfidential is a weird competitive circlejerk made up of professional cooks who are constantly trying to prove themselves as better than each other. So of course they'd never drop anything on the floor, and even if hypothetically they did, then of course they do everything perfectly and by the book, unlike all the other hacks there who are clearly just posing.

1

Practical-Big7550 t1_j1ut580 wrote

Doesn't matter how clean it is, the traffic in kitchens will make it dirty pretty quick. I don't know of any kitchens that require their employees to change their footwear when they go to the restroom. Then they come back and walk with those same shoes that were walking through piss (men's restrooms) and walk about in the kitchen.

1

goodguydick t1_j1rdtbi wrote

I mean a kitchen floor is probably more dirty than a field, no?

−3

onioning t1_j1re7n4 wrote

No. Not by a million miles. Not by a million billion trillion miles.

Kitchen floors are cleaned. Fields are not. Fields very literally can not be cleaned (because then it wouldn't be soil anymore).

11

goodguydick t1_j1ret5x wrote

What about other types of contaminants? I assume there are certain chemicals commonly found on kitchen floors that aren’t found in fields right

6

onioning t1_j1rft76 wrote

They're certainly different, but not better or worse. You do have to wash stuff that falls on the ground, just as you have to wash stuff that comes out of the ground.

5

weirdgrl96 t1_j1r6mgn wrote

This is exactly what I told my son when he told me there were bugs in tomatoes lol

1

Quick-Charity-941 t1_j1qzp50 wrote

People were dying because take away burgers were not cooked well done, the acceptable level of fecal matter mixed in with the process of meat.

0

racooncubbler t1_j1qd5jh wrote

The truth is the are bugs and such in real life, and the nicely packaged food in the supermarket had its start out in the real life world. Food companies do what they can (or at least what is needed) to remove these things in the processing of food but it can’t be 100% otherwise we would never eat. So it becomes a sliding scale of cost vs potential negative impact.

86

Spacebutterfly t1_j1r2cu5 wrote

One stage in human evolution was carrion eaters, they’d wait for a predator to kill an animal and then just chase away the predator

There’s some vestigial behavior that’s definitely been carried on from that- like dry aged meat and “garum” sauce- so I don’t think it actually bothers people that there’s cooked bugs in their food

−14

Ok-Tax-8165 t1_j1rbgf3 wrote

Beef jerky does make me feel like a vulture to be fair

4

nevm t1_j1rm20o wrote

I read somewhere that America allows a certain amount of insect parts per 100g of chocolate citing pretty much as you did. Too much cost to make it worth it. Europe’s limit is zero insect parts.

Even if US chocolate didn’t taste like puke, I am not sure I would eat any anyway based on this.

−28

durge69 t1_j1rxs3q wrote

>Europe’s limit is zero insect parts.

I highly, highly, highly doubt it. Even if the standard is zero, there is still likely insect parts in the chocolate.

The U.S. doesn't allow insect parts because they just said "fuck it", they allow insect parts because it is incredibly difficult to prevent every insect part from making their way into the chocolate.

Unless every chocolate factory in europe is in a billion dollar clean room, I guarantee Europe has insect bits in their chocolate.

>Even if US chocolate didn’t taste like puke, I am not sure I would eat any anyway based on this.

It's butyric acid, and it's just Hershey's chocolate, which I love by the way. The United States has more chocolate than just that one brand.

That's like having some bad curry from one Indian restaurant and swearing up and down that all Indian food is terrible.

Also, I hate bidets.

42

throwaway304uy t1_j1rzsi5 wrote

>Europe’s limit is zero insect parts.

Where's your source?

Because it's literally impossible to make chocolate or coffee without some bugs getting in.

13

DMRexy t1_j1saa59 wrote

Oh yeah? Where are you people getting your lab grown cacao? Because that stuff has plenty of bugs. Do you hand pick them out with tweezers, even the barely visible ones? Is the entire line of production sealed?

There are bugs in your chocolate, like any other.

11

Words_Are_Hrad t1_j1sqzlz wrote

>Europe’s limit is zero insect parts.

No Europe has no official limit for insect parts actually. Guess I better start avoiding your nasty unregulated chocolates!!

11

Scarstead t1_j1qbc7m wrote

Basically you’re gonna eat like 16 cockroaches every year. Just don’t think about it.

Extra mystery protein is always good

67

ToothlessGrandma t1_j1rqg5t wrote

Anyone who is complaining about this, should go to third world countries and see how they make food. I'm seen some of the stuff done in Mexico and Vietnam.

In Vietnam raw chicken was being taken out of a bathroom like sink in the back of the store on the ground visible to everyone around. Most disgusting thing I've ever saw. This is unfortunately more common than not.

12

Scarstead t1_j1rwn7z wrote

When I was in afghan a local village elder would always bring the marines tea. It was the best tea but he would usually steep the leaves AFTER he had slaughtered some livestock and had his hands deeeeep inside whatever it was. You just have to turn your brain off at some point

9

mattgen88 t1_j1qdn90 wrote

Plenty of bugs on all sorts of things we eat.

Put some strawberries in water and watch.

36

skucera t1_j1qidri wrote

Nope. I'll just continue to ignore the fact that I ever found out about this and keep enjoying strawberries, thankyouverymuch.

30

farting2woke2gago t1_j1qm5is wrote

Extra protein for my gainz, yo.

But seriously, wash fruits before eating

10

PerroSarnoso t1_j1qyihm wrote

Raspberries and blackberries are the ones that shed the most creepy crawlers for me once I wash them. Is what it is. Still eat them.

7

Valyrian_Kobolds t1_j1qn9c1 wrote

Yeah I mean rinse your food, it's not rocket science

1

mattgen88 t1_j1r1hnt wrote

Not rinse, you have to soak them to see the worms come out. They're tiny white worm things.

8

bytemage t1_j1qe72a wrote

Don't you worry, it's all stardust.

35

lynivvinyl t1_j1qiuah wrote

If you don't want to eat bugs you're going to need to stop breathing.

28

A40 t1_j1qj9eu wrote

Because if the 'acceptable levels' were zero, there'd be nothing but soft drinks and pop tarts to eat.

16

Dumpster_Sauce t1_j1ss78l wrote

pop tarts have ground up beetles on purpose to make the carmine, on top of the accidentals

3

AnthillOmbudsman t1_j1t762h wrote

Seems like some Pop Tarts do indeed have carmine color on the label, but I really don't understand how it's possible to farm small bugs in the quantities needed (tons) to supply a giant food factory. Imagine if you had to go out and collect 10 tons of ants.

Something about this doesn't add up, and Googling around it seems the Internet is overflowing with anecdotal information on this where everyone is getting their info from vague sources.

1

kkyonko t1_j1vjjrr wrote

> but I really don't understand how it's possible to farm small bugs in the quantities needed (tons) to supply a giant food factory. Imagine if you had to go out and collect 10 tons of ants.

I don't see why not, we kill billions of chickens every year. I would think farming bugs would be much easier.

2

elegantwino t1_j1qmyyf wrote

This is a big reason to cook food. Wheat, corn and other grains are stored for long periods of time in silos. This is home to a lot of pests. For example rats will live reproduce and die in silos filled with grain.

16

cetacretin t1_j1szmcz wrote

You're more likely to get food poisoning from raw flour than you are from raw eggs. Fun fact.

8

reddit455 t1_j1quk40 wrote

as if home kitchens would pass a health inspection

you eat there everyday.

11

Master_Winchester t1_j1qfh29 wrote

I've seen full on grasshoppers/locusts in prepackaged bags of salad. A katydid once! They're literally built to camouflage into the plants so it is what it is.

10

Gr8fulFox t1_j1qwnwf wrote

I'd be so conflicted about that; on the one hand, talk about a sign of freshness! But on the other hand, eww, a bug!

2

onioning t1_j1r1chv wrote

So, some important context. Unlike the EU and other modern nations, the US sets rates above which regulatory action must be taken. Regulatory action may still be taken below those limits depending on the circumstances. Most places have no line above which action must be taken. This is the US being more strict than normal, not less strict.

Contaminants are a part of life. "No contaminants" is not a real option. Inspectors in the US and elsewhere look at the process and determine if appropriate controls are in place. If they're not they may take action, regardless of the amount of contaminants. This is how most nations work. The US is different because we require action when above a said amount.

Big thing to remember is that it isn't "you can have up to this much without regulatory action." It's "you must control for contamination and we'll consider context for deciding what's acceptable unless it rises above the max and then we have to take action."

5

lynivvinyl t1_j1qiow7 wrote

My mom still brings up eating chocolate covered ants and grasshoppers and stuff in the 1960's on purpose.

4

substantial-freud t1_j2a6uvy wrote

There was a Merrie Melodies cartoon centered around a can of chocolate-covered ants. The premise was “here is food that some people like,”

2

J_hilyard t1_j1qn7zl wrote

Wow, oregano can have a bunch of stuff in it:

1250 or more insect fragments per 10 grams, 5 or more rodent hairs per 10 grams

3

anogre8me OP t1_j1qbfay wrote

Ignorance is bliss.

2

itsRho t1_j1qgktr wrote

Honestly, on this one, ignorance is ignorance.

7

DigitalBoy5000 t1_j1t6gao wrote

Do you even understand what that phrase means it seems you don't.

0

toocleverbyhalf t1_j1qmmxz wrote

New word for me: thrips

“Thrips are minute, slender insects with fringed wings and unique asymmetrical mouthparts. Different thrips species feed mostly on plants by puncturing and sucking up the contents, although a few are predators. Entomologists have described approximately 6,000 species.”

2

slowy t1_j1rbzvq wrote

If you do some gardening you’ll eventually get to know the little fuckers

2

AimHere t1_j1r136r wrote

Now what I want to know is whether the acceptable levels for all the contaminants add up to at least 100%.

Because if so, I have plans to create an FDA-approved superfood made up of nothing but maggots, thrips, insect fragments, foreign matter, mold, rodent hairs and insect and mammalian feces, and so on...

2

ToastedN4me t1_j1qkl0y wrote

i saw this exact thing in a smash bros video from like 3 months ago. you really learn stuff like this in weird places

1

Wild-Depth-5265 t1_j1qnrlu wrote

I could've gone me entire life never knowing this, but thank you

1

sneak_king18 t1_j1qrlba wrote

When people claim they will die from "food poisoning". If only you really knew what was in your food/had been on your food.

1

In-Cod-We-Thrust t1_j1qsbk1 wrote

Isn’t that the ingredients list on hotdog packages?

1

Extreme-Cow-722 t1_j1qu39x wrote

Acceptable level of feces. Um okay.

1

AnthillOmbudsman t1_j1t7qxn wrote

It's the shit threshold, Randy. Sometimes it's a little under, sometimes it's a little over.

2

SaintSiren t1_j1qw05u wrote

I want to know how many thrips is safe?

1

neverforget2011 t1_j1qwfzr wrote

I love the way mammalian feces just rolls off the tongue

1

[deleted] t1_j1qwtno wrote

[deleted]

1

A_Melee_Ensued t1_j1qzi69 wrote

Aflatoxin and other mycotoxins, primarily from aspergillus mold, are a big concern with raw wheat flour and corn products. Rodent excreta is not difficult to sieve out. Wheat and corn for human consumption is usually randomly sampled and tested for mycotoxins but nothing requires this, though most grain sale contracts specify testing and thresholds.

Mycotoxins can cause severe illness (usually not lethal though) and are not deactivated by normal cooking temperatures.

1

raptorrat t1_j1rbj4d wrote

"Or something some dude threw in while thinking of meat." George Carlin.

1

Oblic008 t1_j1rl9kv wrote

Yep, I watched Frasier too.

1

Hattix t1_j1rswkq wrote

The bigger TIL here is that the US has several orders of magnitude higher incidence of food-borne illness than any other developed nation. It isn't even close.

1

cetacretin t1_j1t010k wrote

In part because of how much we eat fast food, and how many of those fast food locations have extremely gross soda machines (think specifically the part that stores ice).

The easiest way to avoid food poisoning while eating out is to avoid ice, cilantro, lettuce, and mayonnaise. It's not a guarantee but your odds get better.

2

Practical-Big7550 t1_j1ustje wrote

I went to a Purdue University's Ag lecture where the professor was talking about FDA Acceptable Filth levels. Sounds like this was what he was talking about. Pretty gross when you think about it.

1

zachzsg t1_j1xjj56 wrote

As a refrigeration technician, yall should see what the inside of an average restaurant ice machine looks like. Even the places that gets theirs cleaned every 3 months like recommended have nasty ice machines.

1

36-3 t1_j1tnvcc wrote

I can't handle Thrips in my food

0

Pinkxel t1_j1qdqjf wrote

The answer is none. Nope nope nope. 🤢🤮

−10

Hrtzy t1_j1qfr5v wrote

And do you feel six hundred dollars per pound is a reasonable price for vegetables?

6