frenetix

frenetix t1_jbtm25v wrote

Look at the Seaport District in Boston. Just 20 years ago, it too was just a wasteland full of parking lots. Then as Boston real estate prices soared, it made sense to develop there. Now it's full of residential units, offices, restaurants, night life. East Cambridge went through a similar transformation. It's not my cup of tea- I find it soulless, but it increased the amount of available housing (relieving pressure elsewhere) and increased the city's tax base. The same can be done here with the Jewelry District and other I-195 parcels.

3

frenetix t1_j5pji4w wrote

Welcome to Boston, where the "broker fee" is a time-honored tradition. Waaay back in 2001, a friend of mine was moving out of her apartment at the same time I was looking for one. I ended up paying one months' "broker fee" and all the broker did is literally hand me the key.

When my lease was up, my landlord (I think he owned a bunch of apartments) tried to sue me for not returning the keys to the broker.

You didn't get scammed any more than anyone else who rents in the city. If anything you should look at all paperwork and check to see if the "written notice" was there in 5-point text.

30

frenetix t1_j4idtka wrote

Years. Soon after they closed it, they had a design proposal prepared that was actually pretty nice: high level platforms for the entire station, a place to be covered from the elements, accessibility improvements, better access for busses, etc. As far as I know, nothing has made it beyond the design process.

I cynically believe they're just waiting for the right blend of ice, wind, and rust to finally collapse the existing structure so they can get an excuse to haul it all away.

1

frenetix t1_j3905gr wrote

Those JWU students are no longer clogging up other city apartments; sounds like a win all around. Unless they're getting government handouts, if some developer builds a tower and can't sell the apartments, that's their problem, not ours. I suspect anyone willing to plow millions of dollars into something like this will have thought of that ahead of time.

3

frenetix t1_izzufd6 wrote

"Rhode Island has dedicated $221 million of the $1.1 billion in “American Rescue Plan Act” (ARPA) State Fiscal Recovery funds it received toward affordable housing and homelessness prevention in its fiscal year (FY) 2023 budget. The investment builds on an initial allocation of $29 million for housing that was approved by state lawmakers in January 2022, bringing Rhode Island’s total investment to $250 million, or nearly one-quarter of the state’s ARPA allocation." -- National Low Income Housing Coalition

I wonder where that money is going.

35

frenetix t1_ivf3unw wrote

Not many of us make the kind of mistakes that end up with a criminal record. It's not like this was a stupid one time event like a fight or a stolen car.

10

frenetix t1_iurnc2z wrote

> Notice it doesn't go through the east side?

It follows the already-established railroad tracks from the Pawtucket border to downtown Providence. What alignment through the East Side would have made better sense?

Looking at the current maps, it does look like the little neighborhood around Charles and Randall St. could have been spared if they continued to route I95 on the other side of the post office, to keep it more closely aligned with the train tracks there.

1

frenetix t1_iurk5uv wrote

There are still places where you can see where parts of the connecting roads are still visible. Like at the 93/128 interchange, and the 3/128 interchange in Burlington, and the offramps to nowhere on the elevated highway north of Boston.

We've got these in Rhode Island, like at the eastern side of the Henderson Bridge, and the Rte 1/138 interchange.

6

frenetix t1_iu5kscf wrote

I'm generally pro-2A, and I don't care if you want to sleep with a loaded gun under your pillow with your arms around a warm AR-15 if that's what you're into, that's your right. But the right to be in control of a device that is intended to kill others ("save your life", as you say, since when you shoot someone you don't have any control if they live or die), implies that you should also have the responsibility to not let that firearm into the hands of someone who could use it to harm themselves or others. Like a 7 year old. Or a thief. And that having that responsibility means you should face consequences for letting that happen. So if you don't want to lock your shit up, it's on you if it goes missing and causes harm.

I enjoy shooting, but I don't own my own guns because I don't want to bear that responsibility. If you do, that's great, but you should pay the consequences if you fuck up.

2